Mick Hartley

Tom Nichols in The Atlantic, on Russia’s Vindictive Rage:

Russian television talk shows are a hallucinatory experience, a kind of febrile nightmare shot on sets that look like a dark mash-up of a manic game show, Fox News, and The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari. But the creepy star-chamber vibe and the vertigo-inducing camera work are perfectly suited to the deranged rantings of the hosts and guests. The Russian anchor Vladimir Solovyov is among the nastier pieces of work in this cadre: Nicknamed “Putin’s voice” in Russia, he has called for the destruction of Kyiv and said that nuclear war with the West is inevitable.

And yet, even in the midst of this cuckoo’s nest, there are some small chirps of concern. On Sunday night, as Solovyov engaged in his usual smirking about Russia’s infliction of death and misery in Ukraine, one of his guests had enough. “It’s obscene; it’s not constructive; it’s criminal to bomb peaceful cities,” the former Israeli diplomat Yaakov Kedmi interjected. “These things shouldn’t even be uttered—to ‘wipe a city off the face of the Earth’ is obscene.” Solovyov tried to object, but Kedmi pressed on. “There are 1,001 ways to fight without touching civilians.”

Kedmi is not some squishy peacenik who was pulled off Tverskaya Street to be a designated talk-show punching bag. He was born in Russia, emigrated to Israel, and returned several years ago as a supporter of the Putin regime on Russian television. He’s said some nice things about that great “statesman” Joseph Stalin, and he warned last spring that Russia could bomb the United Kingdom “back to the Stone Age” if the British didn’t mind their own business with regard to Ukraine.

Why were Solovyov and Kedmi having this conversation at all? Because the Russian war in Ukraine is no longer a “war” in the sense that most people would conceive of a military contest between two states over some discrete or tangible issue. It is not, in any sense, the kind of conflict that academic “realists” would understand as some kind of Russian exercise in power balancing against an external threat. Instead, Russia’s invasion is now an ongoing operation of mass murder.

I asked Julia Davis, a Daily Beast columnist who monitors the Russian media, why someone like Kedmi would have a change of heart. She thinks Kedmi, who lives in both Russia and Israel, feels that “the winds are changing,” that Putin is now seen by Russia’s elites as a loser, and that the Russian cheerleaders for the invasion face an increasing chance of “blowback in civilized countries” for their country’s conduct in the war. Davis takes it as a positive sign that Kedmi—and perhaps even Solovyov, who she believes is an opportunist acting the part of a cartoonish warmonger—might be worried enough about Russia losing to start moderating his position as a hedge against being too closely associated with Putin.

Russia, as Kedmi and others now seem to realize, has gone far beyond any of the rationalizations Putin deployed last winter about saving the Ukrainians from “Nazis” or any other such nonsense. The Russians are killing innocent civilians as imperial retaliation for their defiance. Putative military objectives have vanished; Moscow’s goals have devolved into infuriated bloodletting. Each Russian retreat brings a rain of missiles against civilian targets, and the Kremlin isn’t even bothering to make military arguments for these strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure and homes. Such bombings are civilian reprisals that are no different from the Nazi reprisals against the French and other occupied peoples for the resistance of partisans and militias. I taught for many years at a U.S. military college, and I believe these are obvious war crimes.

Russian “strategists”—if any actually exist—might claim that the goal is to demoralize the Ukrainians into abandoning their loyalty to their government and surrendering. But the laws of war do not permit terrorizing civilians into submission, and, in any case, the Russians have almost no hope of occupying much more than the slivers of “annexed territories” they hold now. Moscow’s continued attacks, especially judging from the angry chest thumping from the Russian media, seem to have no other purpose but vengeance, and the intentional murder of civilians for the sake of salving the ego of the incompetent Russian military and placating their desperate commander in chief.

Meanwhile, the latest Russian atrocity:

President Zelensky accused Russia of bringing “terror and murder” to Ukraine after a strike on a maternity ward killed a newborn baby in the southern Zaporizhzhya region.

The two-day old boy was reported to have died as Russian missiles destroyed a maternity hospital in southern Ukraine, in the latest claimed strike on an apparently civilian target.

Ukrainian officials said the child’s mother had survived the attack early this morning, which left the hospital in ruins, but two doctors had been injured.

Bombing hospitals is nothing new: it's what they did in Syria.