• Kathleen Stock in the Telegraph welcomes Kemi Badenoch's latest moves to clarify the Equality Act – but why has it taken the Tories so long?

    Part of the reason must be that they were amongst its principal architects. Far from shoring up the Equality Act in favour of single-sex services where needed, Maria Miller MP set the ball rolling to dismantle them, chairing a scandalously one-sided Women and Equalities Committee inquiry into what was deemed “Transgender Equality” in 2016. This recommended that males with Gender Recognition Certificates be allowed into woman-only spaces and services without restriction, and implied that in many cases males without certificates should be granted access too.

    Then, in 2017, Prime Minister Theresa May initiated the pursuit of “streamlining and demedicalising” the process for acquiring a Gender Recognition Certificate – something that was manifestly bound to cause further interference with the terms of the Equality Act in practice. Three years later, Nokes launched another inquiry into “Reform of the Gender Recognition Act”, once again recommending loosening the restrictions on who could legally change gender as an outcome.

    Successive leaders after May have been utterly cowardly about facing up to her damaging legacy in this area, pretending not to notice as Stonewall-backed law became embedded into both public and private institutions on an epic scale. Within only a few years, prisons, hospital wards, swimming pools, rape crisis services, schools, universities, domestic violence shelters, and nightclubs have all rewritten their policies, permitting male strangers to get up close and personal with females as they undress, use the bathroom, or sleep.

    Female complainants have been vilified for being “transphobic” – sometimes even by Conservative MPs. For the Party to address this mare’s nest only now – advertising on social media yesterday that “we know what a woman is”, in supposed contrast to Starmer’s Labour – is rich, to say the least. There is no doubt that the Conservative Party knew all along what a woman was. Whether it cared, is another matter entirely.

    Yes, there's every reason to be concerned about the prospects of a Labour government, given its general capture by the gender cult and its grim record on women's rights, but it's all been happening under the Tories – and it's a little late now for them to start suddenly making the right noises.

  • From the Daily NK:

    Speaking on condition of anonymity, a source in North Hwanghae Province told the Daily NK on Wednesday that two high school boys in Sariwon’s Mangum district were publicly tried on May 23 for “inciting the corrupt and depraved spirit of capitalism by distributing songs and photos of the puppet state [South Korea].” One of the boys was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor and the other to life imprisonment.

    The trial was held in a conference room at the Sariwon court and was attended by the heads of all the neighborhood watch units in the Mangum area, as well as school staff and ordinary citizens.

    The two boys had often played songs and videos of South Korean idol singers on USB flash drives without their parents’ knowledge. They were so obsessed with the songs that they sang the tunes and performed the dances at school.

    Even when they were not in school, the two boys carelessly sang South Korean songs and performed dances in the presence of people from their neighborhood watch group. Their behavior rubbed off on other teenagers in their neighborhood when they were reported by a state security informant and put on trial.

    “This public trial was held with the purpose of sounding an alarm for all of Sariwon. While the public’s attention was focused on the trial, the authorities denounced the two boys for their treacherous affection for the ‘puppet state,’ knowing full well that South Korea is an enemy state and not the same nation as North Korea. The authorities concluded by saying that the two boys can’t be allowed to live in the same society as other North Koreans,” the source said.

    The mothers of the two boys were also brought in and kept their heads bowed throughout the trial. When their sentences were read, the mothers let out terrible screams and fainted on the spot.

    “Those attending the trial had assumed that the defendants, being teenage boys, would receive at most a few years in juvenile detention, so they were stunned by the harsh sentences handed down at the end of the trial. Many were confused as to why the boys had to be punished so harshly when it wasn’t as if they had killed anyone, and lamented that the world is gradually becoming more brutal,” the source said.

    Well, the North Korean world, certainly…

  • I confess that after years of buying Private Eye, I'm getting to the stage now of flicking through in five minutes and wondering why I bother. And editor Ian Hislop seems to have become far too much of a BBC establishment figure, with his smug appearances on "Have I Got News For You" a constant reminder of why that show is not just years but decades past its sell-by-date. He knows all the right targets to attack to keep in with the people who matter – and all the targets to avoid….

    Which brings us to Graham Linehan, who writes in The Critic today of his interactions with Hislop. He wrote to the Eye editor some years back about serial trans litigant Stephanie Hayden and other gender issues which he thought the Eye might be interested in…but no. Hislop's suspicion was "that the Trans/TERF debate is not quite as important as those involved in it believe".

    This was an issue for which the stakes could not have been higher — for women, for children, for gay people, for freedom of speech, and for me — yet those instincts didn’t so much as twitch when presented with the idea that giving cross-sex hormones to troubled people might not be in their best interests.

    Additionally, there are few aspects of the trans movement that don’t lend themselves to satire. Women’s sports teams who field at least one player who looks like The Hound in Game of Thrones are currently doing very well indeed. In fact, the Flying Bats, an Australian women’s football team, recently enjoyed a phenomenal winning streak which perhaps had something to do with the fact that five members of the team are male.

    One of the members of the team is named Riley Dennis. I first came across him when the late feminist YouTuber Magdalen Berns shared one of his videos (“Are Genital Preferences Transphobic?”) in which he argued that lesbians might be showing bigotry by refusing to sleep with trans-identified, fully intact men.

    This kind of rape culture by stealth was abroad also in Stonewall — ex-CEO Nancy Kelly accused lesbians of being possibly guilty of “sexual racism” for refusing to consider male partners, and a man named Morgan Page remains on the Stonewall website. Page ran the infamous “Overcoming the Cotton Ceiling” workshop in Canada, which promised its male students the opportunity to “identify (sexual) barriers and strategise ways to overcome them”. In other words, a workshop on working around the word “no” in the sentence “no means no”.

    Here then are half a dozen scandals in just a few lines, and Private Eye journalists reported on none of them. Given Hislop’s 2019 reply to me, one can only assume that the fish has been rotting from the head. His behaviour puts me in mind of the famous shot from Police Squad! movies, with Leslie Nielsen flashing his badge, saying, “Nothing to see here, folks. Move along” in front of a scene of ongoing, spiralling mayhem.

    I say I received no reply, but there was one of a sort in the form of an Eye piece years later which mentioned me and my “unhinged Twitter presence, where he frequently accuses transgender activists of being nonces and groomers”. I think I used the word “nonce” once, in which I said most of the central trans figures were members of that category. As a statement it has that unfortunate quality of being true, which is something that keeps biting me in the arse….

    Recently, Charlie Hebdo — the French magazine that suffered a terrorist attack which left many cartoonists dead — published a front cover in which crossdressers, Islamists and other misogynists were all standing on a woman’s back. I remain astonished at the bravery of a title that, unlike Private Eye, is unafraid to tell the truth despite knowing first-hand the cost.

    One last missive. A few years ago, I wrote a letter in defence of J.K. Rowling and managed to get some big names to sign it: John Cleese, Tom Stoppard, Lionel Shriver and, most thrillingly for me, Barry Humphries. This was what Humphries wrote to me:

    Dear Graham,

    You have my signature.

    Thanks for your letter. I’ve been banned by the Melbourne Comedy Festival which Peter Cook and I launched! I’ve been attacked and branded fascist and “transphobic” (sic) by the “they” brigade, and accused of racism by people who have never met an aborigine.

    That actors who have become rich and famous by performing in JKR’s plays and films then vindictively excoriated her, seems to me a cowardly betrayal.

    Thanks for writing to me and good luck against a powerful and malign foe.

    Sincerely

    Barry Humphries

    Peter Cook was, of course, the founding editor of Private Eye, but I’m left wondering if the whole sordid affair was even mentioned in the magazine he created.

    Why did Ian Hislop run away from doing the right thing? Was he appeasing young staff? Is the magazine being held hostage by a staffer with that most fashionable of middle-class accessories, a “trans child”? Was he protecting his team leader gig on Have I Got News For You, which has also been busy looking the other way for the last half-decade?

    Whatever the reason, it’s some sort of tribute to the Eye that when it looks the other way, a scandal can fester for years. Ian Hislop’s only achievement during this time was ignoring the elephant in the room, even as it trampled every value the Eye was meant to uphold.

  • From the Daily NK:

    The US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has confirmed in an unclassified report that Russia used North Korean-made ballistic missiles in its war against Ukraine. In its analysis published at the end of May, the DIA discovered striking similarities between images of missile debris found in the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv after the Jan. 2, 2024 attack and photos of short-range solid-fuel ballistic missiles (SRBMs) in North Korean state media showing North Korean leader Kim Jong Un visiting a missile factory last August.

    And the Korea Herald:

    South Korean Defense Minister Shin Won-sik said Saturday growing evidence pointed to Russia getting weapons from North Korea to attack Ukraine and aiding the Kim Jong-un regime’s military program.

    “Today we see more evidence that the weapons used by Russia to attack Ukraine were illegally imported from North Korea,” the South Korean minister of national defense said in his remarks delivered at the plenary session of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.

    Russia, despite being a permanent member of the United Nations Council, was “receiving weapons from a regime that violates numerous UNSC resolutions they themselves have led,” he said.

    He said that the military cooperation between North Korea and Russia, brought on by the war in Ukraine, was “not only escalating tensions on the Korean Peninsula by advancing the nuclear and missile capabilities of North Korea, but also affecting the battlefield in Europe.”

    “This means that the crisis on the Korean Peninsula is no longer a problem limited to the Korean Peninsula, but rather a problem for all of us,” he said.

    He said that North Korea, in return for providing Russia with weapons, was getting money and technology to expand its military power.

    “North Korea’s reckless development of (a) nuclear and missile program which can strike all countries represented here poses an existential threat for us.”

  • Jack Delano, March 1942. "Chicago, Illinois. Provident Hospital, a Negro institution. Laboratory technician."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Jack Delano for the Office of War Information]

  • Shocking. "Woman adult female human". "Man adult male human". And on the first day of Pride month too! 

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • More on the Edinburgh Book Festival farrago, from Alex Massie in the Times:

    Some 800 authors, including the likes of Sally Rooney, Frankie Boyle, Amy Liptrot, Greta Thunberg, Naomi Klein and many others you have never heard of, have demanded that Baillie Gifford “divest” from its investments in fossil fuels and companies “linked” to Israel. Other luminaries such as Charlotte Church and Nish Kumar have similarly backed “Fossil Free Books”, the cultural vandals masquerading as concerned global citizens.

    Yet no matter how much one sympathises with the invidious position in which the book festival found itself, the decision to part ways with Baillie Gifford is both craven and pathetic. It is a shameful capitulation to scolds and nincompoops whose arguments — to accord them a status they scarcely warrant — collapse after just a few seconds of scrutiny.

    The hypocrisy of these fools knows no bounds. Waterstones is Britain’s biggest bookshop and it is owned by Elliott Advisors, a hedge fund with extensive oil and gas interests. Yet all these authors objecting to Baillie Gifford seem content to allow Waterstones to sell their books. Nor have I noticed authors revolting against Amazon even though, in the weasel words of “Fossil Free Books” the world’s largest online retailer has “direct or indirect links to Israel’s defence, tech and cybersecurity industries”.

    But then so, apparently, do companies such as the chip manufacturer Nvidia and Alphabet, Google’s parent company. By this standard pretty much anyone who uses the internet is “linked” to Israeli “genocide” and anyone with shares in any stock market tracker fund is doubtless doubly implicated.

    It is of course, in that over-worked but useful phrase, virtue-signaling. There's a lot of it about.

    Simon Schama:

    Martin Amis and Christopher Hitchens would have stood up to the protesters trying to silence debate at literary festivals, Simon Schama has said.

    The Hay Festival and Edinburgh International Book Festival have cut ties with sponsor Baillie Gifford after a campaign led by Fossil Fuel Books, which claimed that the asset manager invests in companies with links to Israel, as well as companies that contribute to the climate crisis.

    Invoking his late friends, Schama told a Hay audience: “Book festivals are theatres for listening to each other. I don’t want to see festivals being trapped in some sort of purity test.

    “I go back to dear friends. I’m going to the memorial service of my friend Martin Amis. Martin and Christopher Hitchens and Clive James and a lot of my friends who are not with us were absolutely committed never to have the hands of writers tied behind them.

    “They were merry pugilists. They absolutely believed that you could disagree spectacularly with each other without requiring the silencing or worse of each other.

    “That is the heart and soul of the Hay Festival and the other great festivals that we have in this country, and I don’t want to see them imperilled. All of you, along with me, have to stand up and fight for them.”

  • From the Telegraph:

    Female ice hockey players as young as 14 are being forced to play against adult competitors who are biologically male but identify as female and are being allowed to play in women’s leagues.

    One angry father has revealed that his 15-year-old daughter was in an amateur league game when a trans player who was born male was penalised for hitting a female opponent around the head.

    Under the current rules in ice hockey leagues, female players can play with adult teams from the age of 14. But the whistleblower father, who asked to remain anonymous to protect his daughter’s identity, said such teenage players were now being put in danger by the admission of male-born trans competitors to their games.

    “I’m watching my 15-year-old daughter taking on fully grown men and thinking this isn’t right,” he said. “It’s dangerous, it’s unfair and there’s no good reason for it. Any of these men could play in mixed teams that exist, but they insist on playing in the ladies’ team.

    “Ice hockey is a physical game and if you’re going head to head with a man as a 15-year-old girl there is obviously a strength difference. There’s also much higher levels of aggression in male ice hockey and then these players go to play in women’s teams. I was seething when I saw the female player being hit.”…

    Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the feminist organisation Sex Matters, commented: “It’s not just unfair, it’s unsafe for girls to play ice hockey against biological males.

    “These trans-identifying male players could choose mixed-ice hockey. Instead they are taking places from female players and making every match unfair for women on the ice.”

    Henry Staelens, the chief executive of Ice Hockey UK, said: “Ice Hockey UK is currently coordinating discussions between the governing bodies and leagues to deliver a transgender policy that brings the sport together and prioritises player safety above all else.

    “The extensive process also includes consulting with players, coaches, external agencies across government, the international federation and relevant groups.

    “This will be concluded in the coming weeks with the view to release the policy in July.”

    The default line in sports seems to be, yes fine, let the trans players play wherever they want: we must be fair to these lovely trans women, and it's only girls they're playing against anyway so it's not like it's a big deal. Then people – women – start objecting, it makes the news, and the people who run the sport say, ah yes, well you know, it's all terribly complicated, but, well, we're looking into it. Discussions are being coordinated. Of course it's not complicated at all – couldn't be easier: keep men out of women's sport. But they can't quite manage to see it…

  • Dorothy Bohm – "one of the doyennes of British photography" – has an exhibition in the Print Room downstairs at the Photographers' Gallery.

    "I have spent my lifetime taking photographs. The photograph fulfils my deep need to stop things from disappearing. It makes transience less painful and retains some of the special magic, which I have looked for and found. I have tried to create order out of chaos, to find stability in flux and beauty in the most unlikely places.”

    Bohm1
    Villa des Tulipes, 18th arrondissement, 1953

    Bohm2<
    Shepherd's Bush Market, London, 1970s

    Bohm5
    Paris, 1950

    Bohm6
    New York, 1952

    Bohm3
    Rue Tholozé, Paris, 1954

    Bohm7
    New York, 1953

    Bohm8
    New York, 1970s

    Bohm9
    Mount Street, Mayfair, 1960s

    Bohm10
    Jardin des Tuileries, Paris, 1953

    Bohm11
    Israel, 1970

    Bohm12
    Coney Island, New York, 1952

    Bohm13
    Cannon Street Station, London, 1960s

    Bohm14
    Broadway, New York, 1956

    Bohm15
    Billingsgate, London, 1960s

    Bohm16
    Approach to the Castle, Lisbon, 1963
    [Photos © Dorothy Bohm Archive]