• https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Fact check:

    The polio vaccine was developed by Jewish doctor Jonas Salk, who gave lectures in Israel.

    Israel was the third country in the world to independently produce Salk’s polio vaccine.

    Israel was one of the first countries to carry out mass polio vaccination campaigns, significantly dropping polio rates in rural communities and Arab villages.

    Israel’s contributions to polio research and vaccine development have significantly impacted global efforts to combat the disease.

  • Bret Stephens has an NYT opinion piece (archived) on The Year American Jews Woke Up. The American Jewish saga has, of course, been one of astonishing success despite the setbacks, but in recent years the story's been changing, getting worse, getting darker. And then came October 7th:

    After Oct. 7, it became personal. It was in the neighborhoods in which we lived, the professions and institutions in which we worked, the colleagues we worked alongside, the peers with whom we socialized, the group chats to which we belonged, the causes to which we donated, the high schools and universities our kids attended. The call was coming from inside the house.

    It happened in innumerable ways, large and small.

    The home of an impeccably progressive Jewish director of a prominent art museum was vandalized with red spray paint and a sign accusing her of being a “white supremacist Zionist.” A storied literary magazine endured mass resignations from its staff members for the sin of publishing the work of a left-wing Israeli. A Jewish journalist scrolled through Instagram and recognized an old friend from Northwestern gleefully tearing down posters of Hamas’s hostages while saying “calba” — dog in Arabic — to the pictures of kidnapped infants and elderly people. A leading progressive congresswoman was asked during a TV interview about Hamas’s rapes of Israeli women and called them an unfortunate fact of war before quickly returning to the subject of Israel’s alleged perfidy. An 89-year-old Holocaust survivor petitioned the Berkeley City Council to pass a Holocaust Remembrance Day proclamation in light of the resurgence of antisemitism and was heckled by demonstrators. An on-campus caricature depicted an affable Jewish law school dean holding a knife and fork drenched in blood. A Columbia University undergraduate posted on Instagram: “Be grateful that I’m not just going out and murdering Zionists.” Tucker Carlson platformed a Hitler apologist. Trump warned Jews that he is prepared to blame them should he lose the election.

    All these stories became public, but what could be at least as upsetting were the stories you heard about only over meals with friends and acquaintances. A publishing executive who wanted to promote a novel set during the Holocaust but faced internal resistance from staff members who saw it as “Zionist propaganda.” A college freshman with a Jewish surname being the only person in her dorm to have anti-Israel leaflets pushed under her door. A student who suggested to me, during a give-and-take at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, that Israelis should heed the words of the Book of Matthew and turn the other cheek. It reminded me of Eric Hoffer’s quip that “everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world.”

    At some point, an awakening of sorts occurred. Perhaps not for every American Jew, but for many. I’ve called them the Oct. 8 Jews — those who woke up a day after our greatest tragedy since the Holocaust to see how little empathy there was for us in many of the spaces and communities and institutions we thought we comfortably inhabited. It was an awakening that often came with a deeper set of realizations.

    One realization: American Jews should not expect reciprocity.

    Few minorities have been more conspicuously attached to progressive causes than American Jews: Samuel Gompers and labor unionism; Betty Friedan and feminism; Harvey Milk and gay rights; Abraham Joshua Heschel and civil rights; Robert Bernstein and human rights. A proud history, but whatever we poured of ourselves into the pain and struggle of others was not returned in our days of grief. Nor should we expect much understanding: In an era that stresses sensitivity to every microaggression against nearly any minority, macroaggressions against Jews who happen to believe that Israel has a right to exist are not only permitted but demanded….

    In 2013 the A.D.L. recorded just 751 antisemitic incidents in the United States. In 2023 the organization counted 8,873 incidents, an increase of over 1,000 percent. That included over 1,000 bomb threats to Jewish institutions, thousands of acts of vandalism and harassment, the desecration of graves and more than 160 physical assaults. Unless this changes, the American Jewish community is on its way to living how the European Jewish community has for decades: apprehensive, suspected and under ever increasing layers of private and state protection….

    A century ago, the grand theories were about the evils of capitalism or the hierarchies of race — and Jews wound up on the wrong end of both theories. Today, the grand theory concerns so-called settler colonialism. Not surprisingly, Jews got the short end of this stick, too. Zionism, which since the days of the Maccabees has been the most enduring anticolonial struggle in history, is now the epitome of what college activists seem to think is colonialism, the only solution to which is its eradication. When people argue that education is the answer to bigotry, they often forget that bigotry is a moral failing, not an intellectual one — and few people are more dangerous than educated bigots.

    It's an alarming development. The old white right wing antisemitism never quite went away, and the black Nation of Islam antisemitism under Louis Farrakhan has been festering for a while now, but what seems to be new is the spread of antisemitism – often barely disguised as anti-Zionism – across the universities, and across the liberal progressive class that Jews had every reason to think would be on their side, campaigning with them against the hate. Well….it ain't so.

  • Back to the excellent Café Royal Books, with photographer Robert Blomfield:

    Robert-Blomfield-London-1960s-231023newfflat

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new3

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new4

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new5

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new8

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new2

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new10

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new12

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new9

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new13a

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new14

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new15

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new16a

    Robert+Blomfield+London+1960s+231023new17
    [Photos © Cafe Royal Books/Robert Blomfield]

    Robert Blomfield previously:
    Sheffield 1960s
    Edinburgh in the 1960s

  • Helen Joyce, interviewed at Spiked, on the dangers of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones:

    There are some very real dangers for young children who are dissociating from their bodies. Going through puberty is distressing enough as it is, but it’s doubly distressing for children who dissociate from their bodies in this way. This might mean they’re not able to understand what their bodies are telling them or whether they’re attracted to certain people. If they receive hormone therapy as well, the consequences are catastrophic.

    This is true for both sexes, but more so for girls. Quite simply, testosterone is a hell of a drug. It does a whole load of things to the body that are irreversible. I could grow a beard if I took testosterone. However, if a man took oestrogen, it wouldn’t make his beard stop growing. For something like hair follicles, once they have been switched on, that’s it. You can’t switch them off….

    Testosterone is also terrible for female sex organs. It causes the vaginal lining and uterus to atrophy. Women who are on testosterone for more than a few years are eventually going to have to get their sex organs removed – which means they will be sterilised. However, oestrogen doesn’t really undo the things that testosterone does. Cross-sex hormones do far more damage to girls’ bodies than they do to boys.

    There is a push to try to start male transition earlier or to block their puberty so they never go through testosterone-driven changes. But people are now realising that all of these interventions are very bad for a developing person. Taking what are euphemistically called ‘puberty blockers’ affects a child’s bones, brain and sexual organs irreversibly. It also affects future fertility and sex drive. If you stop all the natural processes that are supposed to mature a person during puberty, it will be disastrous….

    How are you meant to know whether you’re gay or straight if you block puberty? By definition, gay people are more gender-nonconforming. This is because being attracted to someone of the same sex is gender-nonconforming. Research shows that people who are very notably gender-nonconforming in early youth often grow up to be gay. Of course, it’s more nuanced than that, because there are lots of little boys who want to play with dolls and are straight. But statistically speaking, if you’re very gender-nonconforming pre-puberty, you’re something like 20-times more likely to grow up gay.

    These boys are now the people who are being told they’re probably girls. I think this is kind of a modern gay conversion therapy. They’re turning proto-gay boys into sterile facsimiles of straight girls.

    Which is, interestingly enough, what happens in Iran. The BBC from 2014 (not sure they'd publish this now):

    Iran is one of a handful of countries where homosexual acts are punishable by death. Clerics do, however accept the idea that a person may be trapped in a body of the wrong sex. So homosexuals can be pushed into having gender reassignment surgery – and to avoid it many flee the country.

    Something of a paradox, then – progressives cheering on the policies of a violently homophobic misogynist theocratic regime. Then again, seeing as many are out marching most weekends in support of the Iran-backed Islamist proxies of Hamas and Hezbollah, maybe it's not so strange after all.

  • Here, a few weeks back – Pyongyang now Moscow's leading arms supplier. Now, in the Times:

    Half of the shells used by Russia — about three million a year — are being supplied by North Korea, according to western intelligence.

    President Putin travelled to Pyongyang earlier this year to sign a defence pact with Kim Jong-un and the Kremlin has become dependent on the shuttered authoritarian state to maintain its advances in eastern Ukraine, intelligence sources say.

    Although many of the shells are believed to be faulty, the sheer quantity has allowed Russia to make steady gains, most recently capturing the eastern Ukrainian city of Vuhledar.

    Kyrylo Budanov, Ukraine’s head of military intelligence, warned in September that shipments of North Korean shells were tilting the war in Russia’s favour. “Our biggest problem from all these allies of Russia is from North Korea. Because with the volume of military products that they supply, they actually affect the intensity of the fighting,” he said.

    During the initial years of the war, Russia’s allies appeared reluctant to actively supply Moscow with weapons. However, Putin’s efforts to build an anti-western coalition appear to be paying off and are having an impact on the battlefield.

    Here in the West, on the other hand, the reluctance to supply Ukraine with weapons against Russia's murderous onslaught appears to be mounting – or at least the restrictions placed on their use.

  • The pitiful state of the literary world – the latest in a continuing saga:

    Cheltenham Literature Festival has come under fire after issuing a warning notice to speakers comparing gender-critical views with racism and homophobia.

    The festival, which begins today, sent an email to people who are hosting talks at the event, asking them to follow new guidance “in order to protect both yourselves and the [festival] from complaints”.

    It said: “If, during any of your events, a speaker shares an opinion that could be deemed controversial, please reinforce that everyone is entitled to express an opinion, however Cheltenham Festivals [the organiser] does not endorse the views shared on stage.

    “By controversial we mean those views that may be harmful to an individual or group of people, particularly those who have been historically marginalised or oppressed.”

    It gave a list of examples headed by “gender-critical views”. The list went on to include “misogyny; extreme political views including on migration, sexuality, gender, and military action; potentially problematic views on race, religion, or ethnicity; homophobia, including opinions linked to religion; extreme views on abortion and female reproductive health; widely disputed conspiracy theories”.

    In response, JK Rowling wrote on X: “Might start a literary festival where legal beliefs can be expressed from the stage without the chairpeople wetting themselves.”

    Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy at the human rights charity Sex Matters, said: “Heaven forbid that a book festival should allow mention of biological reality without immediately distancing itself.

    “It is of course outrageous to compare gender-critical views to racism or conspiracy theories. But Cheltenham Literature Festival is only revealing publicly the degree of hostility routinely suffered in private by gender-critical women in literary circles.

    “The festival organisers should be pressed to explain exactly how they think gender-critical views could be considered ‘harmful’ to individuals or groups of people.”

    More from Joan Smith at UnHerd:

    It’s hard to imagine a worse moment for a literary festival to promote the slur that the free expression of controversial ideas is “harmful”. We live in an increasingly intolerant society, in which saying the wrong thing — criticism of strict forms of Islam or gender ideology — carries an unacceptable risk. The people who shout loudest are rarely right, and the literary world needs to stand up against the activists’ veto.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    1) Palestinians have never aspired to self determination in their own state, not if it means living next to a Jewish state. Every time they faced a choice between having self determination in an Arab Palestine living next to a Jewish Israel, from 1937 to the present, they walked away and followed up it up with brutal violence.
    2) UNRWA – the funding and legitimacy it provides to the lies of “perpetual refugees” and a “right of return” – is the very reason Palestinians believe they can persist in rejecting every opportunity for self determination in part of the land so as to pursue “return”.
    3) The true statement would read as follows:”We have to maintain UNRWA until the aspiration of the Palestinians to erase the Jewish state and to eradicate Jewish sovereignty anywhere between the River and the Sea has been achieved. That is the reason for our continued existence and the reason we were hijacked by the Arab refugees in the first place. They wanted to ensure they would never be settled until they finally achieve the goal they failed to attain in 1948 of strangling the Jewish state at birth”.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • From the Times:

    Universities in Wyoming and Utah have joined an escalating boycott of a rival women’s volleyball team with a transgender player after interventions from Republican politicians.

    Teams from four universities in Wyoming, Utah and Idaho have forfeited games against San José State University, which counts Blaire Fleming, who identifies as a woman, among its players.

    Spencer Cox, Utah’s Republican governor, said on Wednesday that Utah State University volleyball team would forfeit their October 23 match against San José State, posting on X that it was “essential that we preserve a space for women to compete fairly and safely”.

    The statement followed a similar announcement from the University of Wyoming’s Cowgirls. They had planned to go ahead with their game on Saturday and the team had told local media that “no student-athletes expressed any concern regarding their safety”.

    Days before the game, however, the Cowgirls said in a statement that “after a lengthy discussion”, they had decided not to play.

    The reason was not stated, but Cheri Steinmetz, a Republican senator for Wyoming, published an open letter calling for the match to be cancelled. Other local politicians expressed similar sentiments.

    Steinmetz said that because the University of Wyoming was publicly funded, its Cowgirls “should not participate in the extremist agenda of Diversity Equity and Inclusion or propagate the lie that biological sex can be changed”.

    “We further ask you to foster an environment where ladies are honoured and protected, and men are respectful and gentlemanly,” the letter added. Transgender rights and diversity and inclusion policies are a hot topic as November’s presidential election approaches. Sporting bodies across North America have struggled to craft a response on transgender participation…..

    LGBT activists have criticised the moves. “Athletics should be about fostering teamwork, growth, and healthy competition — not about discrimination and exclusion,” said Santi Murillo of Wyoming Equality.

    The controversy is presented as the result of pressure from Republican politicians who aren't up to speed on the joys of "fostering teamwork, growth, and healthy competition", promoting instead a cynical appeal to the old-fashioned virtues of honouring and protecting the womenfolk, while the men are gentlemanly and respectful – holding the doors open and offering up their seats on public transport. You sense the implication that these reactionaries think ladies should really stay in the kitchen anyway, and look after the kiddies.

    But of course this is really about protecting women's sport from the incursion of stronger, faster, and bigger men. It's hardly the fault of the Republicans that the progressive left has lost its collective mind to gender ideology, and thinks (or claims to think) that men can become women simply by saying they're women. It's an open goal.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    See also Collier's look at BBC Verify's report on the Iranian missile strikes in Israel – "blatant lies worthy of a Russian Soviet era misinformation service".