• Lovely tribute to fellow Times journalist Andrew Norfolk from Janice Turner:

    Before she rang Andrew Norfolk, the Rotherham whistleblower Jayne Senior had already contacted several national newspaper journalists. She had told them that as a youth worker she saw many underage girls who were being groomed and raped by a local gang of British-Pakistani men. She had made notes, had names, addresses, car registrations. Were they interested? None replied — until Andrew….

    Social workers saw not child sexual abuse victims but dirty little slags of the very worst sort since they “even” went with Pakistani men. Police treated the girls’ complaints as not worth the paperwork, let alone the extra hassle of sparking community tensions. In tight-knit communities such as Rotherham or Rochdale, huge, permanent Labour majorities removed all political oversight. Councillors were sometimes related to abusers and if violence got out of hand, cosy deals could be cooked up with a friendly cop. The girls were worthless collateral in men’s games.

    So when Jayne Senior sat down with this quiet, earnest man from The Times, her expectations were low. When she offered him a memory stick containing case files and names, she was amazed that he not only vowed to investigate but to protect her from possible imprisonment as his source.

    Beyond the therapy profession, few men have listened to more horrific tales of sexual abuse. Teenagers told him they’d been raped so often at such a tender age they could not bear children, that they’d been taken on to the moors and told to dig their own graves, or raped by a dozen men in one night. This was not just upsetting but difficult work: the girls could be infuriating, flawed witnesses, too drunk at the time to remember details. Yet he kept listening.

    A distinct pattern emerged. While paedophiles usually work alone and in secret, these men did so collectively and openly, with friends or relatives, or fellow Pakistani Muslims working in the late-night economy for minicab companies and fast food outlets. And this modus operandi was replicated in other towns, and always — as in Rotherham — ignored.

    It was a sensational story yet Norfolk, importantly, told it without sensationalism. Forensic and thorough, he refused to grandstand or promote his exclusives on social media, and only reluctantly appeared on TV. Squeezed on one side by angry liberal academics and community leaders, on the other by the gleeful far right, he cared only about the truth….

    Surprisingly few men, I’ve found, are willing to risk their momentary discomfort, let alone careers, in fighting for women’s causes. Andrew Norfolk’s tireless efforts took an enormous toll: he was often exhausted, traumatised by the horror of what he had heard. I pray he died knowing this wasn’t in vain, that abuse continues but no one can pretend there’s nothing to see when a 14-year-old girl has sex with an adult male. Andrew, righteous among men, will be remembered as one who ran into the fire while others fled.

  • I know I know – should be used to this by now, but I still can't quite believe that this is the President of the USA.

    Trump

  • Meanwhile…another member of the poor persecuted trans community.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Depressing, but not surprising:

    Whitehall is refusing to implement single-sex spaces in government departments until Britain’s equality regulator intervenes, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling on the definition of the word “woman” as it is used in the Equality Act.

    The Times understands that departments have been told to keep existing policies in effect while reviews are undertaken, even though they may conflict with the ruling, which said single-sex spaces must be based on biological sex.

    Meanwhile, members of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), the largest civil service union, are calling for “possible industrial, legal and human rights challenges” to guidance that had the effect of “segregating our trans and non-binary members in the workplace”.

    The idea that our "our trans and non-binary members" are some poor persecuted minority – while women just need to shut up and move aside – is so ingrained by now in polite society that the mere fact that all this is illegal hardly registers.

    Human resources and staff networks have advised civil servants that the policies remain in effect while they are under review, despite many advising that transgender people are able to use whichever facilities they feel most comfortable with.

    The Daily Mail reported that members of the PCS union were pushing to ensure any government guidance that imposed single-sex spaces based on biology was “vigorously opposed”.

    A government spokesperson said: “We will update policy wherever it is necessary and will be guided by the revised EHRC code of practice when it becomes available.”

    But it's the law. The law now.

    However, one civil servant said: “The culture at a departmental level has got worse as a result of the Supreme Court ruling. There is still a culture of fear around speaking up about the biological nature of sex, and gender-critical women are still openly being called bigoted, Nazis and racist for their views.

    “The prevailing narrative is that the Supreme Court ruling is a great injustice to trans people, with most comms focusing on supporting transgender colleagues and allies. Most people do not feel able to speak up or challenge policies, all of which remain in place despite directly contradicting the ruling.”…

    Maya Forstater, chief executive of the charity Sex Matters, said: “Whitehall’s failure to follow the law is a national scandal. It should lead by example but refusing to implement the Supreme Court judgment smacks of ideological extremism.

    “There has been widespread defiance across the public sector, and with even senior civil servants now flouting the judgment and the law, political leadership and intervention is urgently needed.

    “The judgment could not have been clearer, and there is no excuse for delaying any change to unlawful policies. Government departments and regulators are knowingly sitting on a ticking time bomb and will only put themselves at further risk of legal action by refusing to make the necessary changes.”

  • Chicago ca. 1910. "Entrance to Auditorium Annex (i.e., Congress Hotel), Michigan Avenue."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Detroit Publishing Company]

  • I posted a few times, in 2016 and 2017 and 2020, on photographer Quintin Lake's epic journey round the British coast – a journey documented at The Perimeter. He set off clockwise from London in April 2015 and finished in September 2020. Now, finally, he's edited the original 179,222 photos down to a curated selection of 1,300 for his new book, titled, appropriately enough, The Perimeter: A Photographic Journey around the Coast of Britain.

    A few from the early days of the journey…

    Perimeter11
    Exminster Marshes, Devon, 2016.

    Perimeter49
    Pagham Harbour, Sussex, 2015.

    Perimeter50
    Drinks on the shore, Ferring, Sussex, 2015.

    Perimeter59
    Net Shops, Hastings, Sussex, 2015.

    Perimeter63
    Beach hut, Rye Harbour, Sussex, 2015.

    Perimeter76
    Liquified natural gas plant, Isle of Grain, Kent, 2015.

    Perimeter70
    Folkestone Harbour, Kent, 2015.

    Perimeter77
    Cliffe explosives works, Hoo Peninsula with London Gateway Port, Kent, 2015.
    [Photos: Quintin Lake]

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Also:

    The so-called feminists that support gender ideology are third wave/intersectional feminists. Intersectional feminists are to feminism what National Socialists were to socialism. That is, they aren't feminists. No feminist would say, e.g., that prostitution is "empowering."

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Except he's a man.

    Again from Genevieve Gluck at Reduxx:

    A trans-identified male residing in Colorado has been charged with sexual assault, kidnapping, and false imprisonment after taking a woman hostage for three days. On November 30, Hannah Viramontes, 26, took the unidentified female victim captive to abuse as a “sex slave,” and told her he would kill her if she tried to escape. Viramontes, previously known as Cameron Mauldin, is accused of brutally beating and torturing the victim before she was able to escape and contact authorities.

    Local news reports have referred to Viramontes simply as a “woman,” with no mention of his transgender status or biological sex.

    He beat the woman, and sexually assaulted her.

    When officers arrived on the scene, they discovered the victim had sustained multiple serious injuries, including “severe” bruising to her face. She was also riddled with puncture and bite marks, and was taken to a hospital for treatment, where a doctor determined she was at “a substantial risk of serious permanent disfigurement.”

    But, such is the power of the gender cult, the press lied rather than say the attacker was a man. Following cult doctrine overrules any requirement to tell the truth.

    Also:

    Reduxx has also learned that Viramontes had previously played American-style football on a local women’s team. According to a 2021 Facebook post, Viramontes played the contact sport against female opponents on the Rocky Mountain Thunderkatz as a linebacker.

    The team, which is semi-professional and under the umbrella of the Women’s Football Alliance, has boasted of being “LGBTQ inclusive,” and has previously made posts using the progress pride flag filter on Facebook.

  • Genevieve Gluck at Reduxx:

    A woman in Brazil is currently under police investigation for “transphobia” after she posted a joke online about archaeologists being able to discern a person’s sex by observing differences in bone structure. Speaking at a women’s rights protest in Rio de Janeiro in April, Karen Mizuno revealed that she was notified by police that she was facing possible criminal charges because she had mocked a trans activist who had stated that “archaeologists are transphobic.”

    Mizuno explained that her ordeal began after an article was circulated about Lucy, a well-known fossil of a female human ancestor which dates back approximately 3.2 million years.

    “The situation was, there was an article going around about the bones belonging to the fossil of Lucy, and how the archaeologists found out that she was a woman, because of the pelvic bone,” Mizuno said. “Trans activists were saying that attesting that Lucy was a woman, because of her female pelvic bone, was transphobia. In other words, they said she could be a trans man. They really think that someone who lived three million years ago had a ‘gender identity.’ It’s an unreasonable argument, an anachronism.”

    It's fucking ridiculous is what it is.

    She continued: “I took screen shots of the tweet with these accusations of alleged ‘transphobia’ by the archaeologists, which said exactly the following: ‘This tweet reminds me of something I never see people talking about. Archaeologists are indeed transphobic. That so-called Lucy, for example, are they inferring she was a woman based on the bones alone? Does that mean that if I die, in 500 or 5000 years someone might disrespect my gender because of that?”

    Mizuno took a screen shot of the comment and posted it with her own commentary, writing: “With each passing day, human extinction ceases to become a fear and becomes something to hope for.” Mizuno explains that it was intended to be a light-hearted joke.

    She was informed later by the police that a criminal investigation had been opened into her comments.

    Mizuno explains that police first became aware of her while they were probing the social media of Isabela Cêpa, another women’s rights activist who they were similarly investigating for criminal “transphobia.” As previously reported by Reduxx, Cêpa has been threatened with up to 25 years in prison for “misgendering” a transgender politician named Erika Hilton.

    That previous Reduxx report is here.

    Strange country, Brazil. 

    Despite being a very conservative country, Brazil has some of the most extensive laws against transphobia in the world. In 2019, Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court ruled that discrimination against ‘LGBTQ Community’ constituted a penal offense, but fell under existing race-based protections as a form of “social racism.”

  • They still don't get it. NHS trust policy ‘allowed biological men to use women’s changing room’.

    Guidance issued by an NHS hospital would allow men identifying as women to use female changing rooms, despite warnings that the policy breaks the law.

    Officials from the Royal College of Nursing wrote to senior administrators at the County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust to warn that Darlington Memorial Hospital was breaching 33-year-old workplace legislation that requires the provision of single-sex changing facilities for men and women.

    The row is the latest development in a legal battle over transgender policies at the trust, which a group of female nurses has claimed puts women “at risk”.

    It puts women at risk by allowing a man into the women-only changing room, where he asks why they're not getting undressed yet while they can see his genitals through his underwear. But he claims he's trans, and so benefits from the holy mantle of inclusivity.

    It has now emerged that in the last week of March officials at the royal college — the professional body for nurses in the UK — wrote to a director at the trust to complain that it was in breach of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992.

    The college pointed out that those regulations required “the provision of single-sex changing facilities for men and women — the only exception being where the provision is of single lockable rooms (not cubicles)”.

    The official said that the college was flagging the statutory position “given the ongoing legal dispute and internal investigation” around the dispute over a transgender nurse at the hospital. The letter added that “the regulations also appear to have been overlooked by other organisations”, before stating that the college “expects the trust to comply with these statutory provisions and provide single-sex changing rooms without delay”.

    However, campaigners representing the women have said that three days after the letter was sent, the trust director re-published its “transitioning in the workplace policy”, without any changes to the guidance, which, it is claimed, said that a biological man can change in the female staff changing rooms.

    The only sign of hope here is that at least the Royal College of Nursing seems to have got the message.