Mick Hartley

Whoops.

The first paragraph has now been slightly changed but the headline remains defamatory

— Akua Reindorf KC (@akuareindorf) June 6, 2025

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Headline now amended to, EHRC commissioner calls for trans people to accept perceived reduced rights.

Added:

The staggeringly dishonest presentation of Akua's comments here expresses the very heart of the political problem regarding the objectives the trans rights movement, the attack on women's rights, and the complicity of many parts of the left, including The Guardian, with that… https://t.co/gbx3MruwYP

— Dr. Jane Clare Jones (@janeclarejones) June 6, 2025

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Full text:

The staggeringly dishonest presentation of Akua's comments here expresses the very heart of the political problem regarding the objectives the trans rights movement, the attack on women's rights, and the complicity of many parts of the left, including The Guardian, with that attack.

The Supreme Court judgement *does not reduce the rights of trans people as given in law.*

What it does is correct the situation *in which the trans rights movement had arrogated itself 'rights' by disseminating a false interpretation of the law which undermined women's rights.*

It arrogated itself these 'rights,' therefore, by non-democratic means, and attempted to enforce its claims by preventing anyone from discussing what it was doing, and threatening and trying to destroy the livelihood and reputations of people who refused to comply.

The act of injustice here is one that has been perpetrated *by* the trans rights movement *against* the people whose rights they attempted to non-democratically help themselves to, that is, women and especially lesbians.

And the main newspaper of the left is still so largely captured by the ideological discourse of the trans rights movement that it is totally failing to accurately inform its readers about what has happened, how this situation arose, who has wronged who, and what the SC judgement actually represents.

It is still seeking to present the wronged parties as the aggressors, and the people who spent over a decade illegitimately trying to remove their rights as the victims.