Titania McGrath (aka Andrew Doyle) grapples with the big question that everyone's asking – what is a woman? Don’t trust the myths of biology:

Scientists and intellectuals have long struggled to determine what a “woman” might be. This mysterious concept has evaded the sharpest of minds through human history. It is very much the holy grail of metaphysics, a will-o’-the-wisp dancing on the ever-receding horizon of knowledge.

So when Boris Johnson claims he knows what a “woman” is, and that they ought to have “single-sex spaces” and their own categories in sports, we should treat his comments with the derision they deserve. When Keir Starmer was asked if a woman could have a penis during an interview by Nick Ferrari on LBC, the Labour leader’s response was far more incisive and dignified: “Uh, Nick, I’m not, er, I, I don’t think we can conduct this debate with, you know, I get this, uh.” This just goes to show that only a Labour government will be able to bring clarity to this issue….

Anyone who asks the question “what is a woman?” is thereby revealing that they have the intelligence of your average garden slug. This is why we shouldn’t trust these so-called “archaeologists” who claim to be able to determine whether those ancient skeletons they’ve uncovered are “male” or “female”. This is pure pseudo-science. Next they’ll be telling us they can work out their pronouns by measuring the femurs.

Let me settle this matter once and for all. A woman is anyone who says she is a woman. A woman is a feeling, a shimmering nimbus of possibility, an echo of distant dreams reverberating gingerly through a winter’s gloaming. She is a mewling constellation, a bagful of semi-felched pixies, the enchanted stardust that pirouettes luminously on the spindle of time.

It’s got absolutely nothing to do with tits.

Posted in

2 responses to “Nothing to do with tits”

  1. Michael van der Riet Avatar
    Michael van der Riet

    “As I’ve repeatedly pointed out, there is no science to back up the claim that transgenderism exists. All that the leftist community belches out is faux science that presumes that transgenderism is something more than a mental illness or, even giving it the most generous interpretation, a hormonal imbalance.”
    I came across this by accident — I don’t normally follow US right-wing blogs — at Newman’s Door. I have no reason to believe that transgenderism is strongly correlated to political leanings. https://www.bookwormroom.com/2022/04/30/reason-to-hope-in-the-war-for-americas-soul/

    Like

  2. Michael van der Riet Avatar
    Michael van der Riet

    Apologies, it’s Newmark’s Door. https://www.newmarksdoor.com/mainblog/

    Like

Leave a reply to Michael van der Riet Cancel reply