Back to the old "Jews are white and privileged" line:

The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is investigating a complaint alleging that Jewish students enrolled in Brooklyn College’s graduate mental health counseling program have been subjected to anti-Semitic harassment from professors and peers.

The complaint, filed on behalf of two Jewish students in the master’s program, alleges that professors in the program “have maligned Jews on the basis of race and ethnic identity by advancing the narrative that all Jews are white and privileged and therefore contribute to the systemic oppression of people of color.” It also alleges that Jewish students have “been bullied in class discussions and on social media by student peers who target Jewish students using the same ethnic stereotypes, antisemitic tropes and divisive concepts that faculty members promote in their courses.”

The complaint, which comes at a time of rising anti-Semitism on American college campuses, alleges that Jewish students who pushed back or expressed distress “were met with further harassment and intimidation from faculty and administrators, who told students to ‘get your whiteness in check’ and to ‘keep your head down’ rather than challenge the status quo.”

It's noteworthy that antisemitism at UK campuses is focused very much on Palestinian rights and BDS and "Zios", while in the US – as well as all that – there's the added bonus of this Jews as kind of super-whites view: that Jews are whites but more so because they're super-powerful and super-privileged. I don't think we get that here…yet. Either way, though, it's the same "oldest hatred".

“When someone would say for example, ‘I’m Jewish,’ professors would say, ‘No, you’re not, you’re white, and you don’t understand oppression and you need to sit down and you need to be quiet and you need to let the Black people in the program speak about their experiences’ and wouldn’t allow us to speak about ours,” the student said.

The complaint describes a number of alleged incidents during the fall 2020 semester centering around questions of Jewishness, whiteness and privilege. In one described incident in August 2020, Doe 2 attended a class where the professor allegedly stated, “In sum and substance, that Ashkenazi Jews who immigrated to America have become part of the oppressors in this country.”…

Denise Katz-Prober, director of legal initiatives for the Brandeis Center, said that at Brooklyn College and elsewhere, “Jews are being relegated to this category of white privileged oppressors in a way that not only invokes dangerous age-old antisemitic stereotypes about power and control but denies Jewish history, the complexity of the Jewish experience, as well as erases Jewish identity.”

The case at Brooklyn College bears similarities to complaints filed last year by two members of Stanford University’s Counseling and Psychological Services staff alleging anti-Jewish bias in a diversity, equity and inclusion program. The complaints alleged that the DEI program for Stanford’s counselors, intended to help them better serve a diverse group of students, “engages in intentional racial segregation through race-based affinity groups” and “relies upon racial and ethnic stereotyping and scapegoating by describing all Jews as white or white-passing and therefore complicit in anti-Black racism.”…

Doe 2, the complainant who identifies as both Jewish and Hispanic, decided to leave Brooklyn College’s master’s program in mental health counseling because of the climate.

“I just started to not want to be around these people, to feel scared, really just like I was walking on eggshells,” the student said. “It’s not a mentally healthy place for somebody to be, especially as a person of color. It’s not like I don’t know what discrimination is, and now to be told all of those experiences don’t matter and your skin color doesn’t matter because now you’re essentially white and privileged because Jews are white and privileged, which negates all of the history of the Jews, and on a personal level it completely erases my lived experience, and for it to be fortified by the students and the teachers—it’s crazy-making.”

Posted in

5 responses to “Jews don’t count, pt. 79”

  1. Joanne Avatar

    One concept that’s apparently not taught in schools is that of “pariah” peoples.
    These are groups that achieve economic success, but not the social acceptance and standing that normally comes with it. Jews are a long-time example of this, while other examples include overseas Chinese, overseas Indians (especially in East Africa), Lebanese in West Africa, Armenians and, I believe, the Ibo.
    Because these groups are not fully accepted, their economic presence is seen as an intrusion, as somehow insidious and illegitimate. Though their success can be impressive, it is often not very secure.
    I think that “pariah” is an unfortunate term for these peoples, as it implies that they’re like the pariahs of India, which is not the case.
    If classes about racism taught this concept (I learned it in a graduate course on ethnicity), students would be able to recognize that groups can be wealthy, but not dominant or dominating.

    Like

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    That’s an interesting view. I guess Jews thought that in America they’d achieved social acceptance as well as economic success. In many ways of course they were quite right: no country has been more welcoming to Jews than America. They’re integral not just economically but culturally too. Is this increasing antisemitism now just a temporary blip, or is it a sign that things were never that rosy and there were always problems under the surface?
    Well OK, I know, it’s not that simple….

    Like

  3. Joanne Avatar

    I was also wondering if the USA is different. Perhaps it is, but not to the extent that the Jews and others had thought. My guess is that things will be uncomfortable for the Jews for a while, but things will blow over. There will always be some discomfort, but not enough to prevent them from getting on with their lives.
    It’s not like Germany in the late 19th/early 20th centuries, where the Jews thought themselves very secure in one of the most civilized countries in the world. The problem there was that they had achieved more rights and a greater degree of acceptance legally, but German society was not really ready for that. In the US, the extent of cultural and social acceptance is far greater, though not perhaps 100 percent complete and secure. Still, it’s secure enough not to be reversed, just shaken a bit.

    Like

  4. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    I suppose the current issue is that whereas in earlier times antisemitism in the US was largely a fringe thing confined to the usual far-right groups, plus the Nation of Islam, we now see it spreading to areas where it would have previously been inconceivable, like these colleges full of people who no doubt think of themselves as impeccably liberal and decent and anti-racist.

    Like

  5. Joanne Avatar

    Yes, that is an important point. I don’t know how much worry it justifies, though. On the one hand, colleges and universities are shaping future generations. On the other, I hear that this stuff just rolls off the students like water off a duck’s back, at least in the US. They’re not impressed,influenced, or particularly interested, so it doesn’t stick.
    Again, I think the truth will be somewhere in between. Well-grounded students or those who are just apolitical won’t be much influenced by their professors, but those who are already on the left and committed probably will be.
    It’s possible that the concentrations of antisemitism won’t spread beyond the current redoubts: universities, cultural institutions, mainstream media, NGOs. But antisemitic (and other woke) views might eventually spread to the general population, even if in diluted form.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mick H Cancel reply