It's Donald Trump's – President Trump's – catch-phrase. A reminder of its history:

the center of his foreign policy vision, Donald Trump has put “America First,” a phrase with an anti-Semitic and isolationist history going back to the years before the U.S. entry into World War II. 

Trump started using the slogan in the later months of his campaign, and despite requests from the Anti-Defamation League that he drop it, he stuck with it.

Friday, he embraced the words as a unifying theme for his inaugural address.

“From this day forward, a new vision will govern our land,” Trump said on the Capitol steps. “From this day forward, it’s going to be only America First. America First.” 

Those same words galvanized a mass populist movement against U.S. entry into the war in Europe, even as the German army rolled through France and Belgium in the spring of 1940.

A broad-based coalition of politicians and business leaders on the right and left came together as the America First Committee to oppose President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s support for France and Great Britain. The movement grew to more than 800,000 members.

While the America First Committee attracted a wide array of support, the movement was marred by anti-Semitic and pro-fascist rhetoric. Its highest profile spokesman, Charles Lindbergh, blamed American Jews for pushing the country into war.

"The British and the Jewish races," he said at a rally in September 1941, "for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war."

The “greatest danger” Jews posed to the U.S. “lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government,” Lindbergh said.

It is unclear if Trump is bothered by the ugly history of the phrase….

“It is such a toxic phrase with such a putrid history,” said Susan Dunn, professor of humanities at Williams College and an expert in American political history, in an interview.

Lindbergh and other prominent members of the America First organization believed democracy was in decline and that fascism represented a new future, Dunn said.

Those words “carry an enormous weight,” said Lynne Olson, author of “Those Angry Days,” a book about the clash between Lindbergh and Roosevelt over entering the war.

“That time was strikingly familiar to now,” Olson said. “There was an enormous amount of economic and social turmoil in the country, anti-Semitism rose dramatically as well as general nativism and populism.”

 

Posted in

12 responses to “America First”

  1. djf Avatar
    djf

    The closest contemporary parallel to Nazi Germany is Iran, which the outgoing Obama administration did everything in its power to appease and aggrandize. Yet, based on his use of a two-word phrase, it is Trump whom you compare to Lindbergh.
    Incidentally, if governments, in making policy, should not put the interests of their own citizens first, why should we have democracy at all? If the point is to put the interests of “the world” first, wouldn’t it make more sense to leave governing to unelected experts, like the geniuses running the EU?

    Like

  2. Hal Avatar
    Hal

    There is nothing dishonorable about an American president putting American interests first. But what, exactly, are America’s “interests” is a matter of debate.
    I don’t always agree with George Will, but I share his take on Trump’s inaugural address. I thought that Trump would make some effort to project the image of a bright new beginning, but brightness doesn’t seem to be in his vocabulary. Or elegance.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2017/01/20/a-most-dreadful-inaugural-address/
    As for an education system producing students “deprived of all knowledge”, he should know: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432010/trump-university-scam

    Like

  3. Bob-B Avatar
    Bob-B

    The American Communist Party was also opposed to any US involvement in the War prior to Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union. They of course were putting Russia first. The new President is probably not doing that, but he does appear to be considerably more popular in Russia than in the US, where he has the lowest approval relations of any recent incoming President.

    Like

  4. Alan Potkin Avatar

    Cheap shot, Mr. Hartley, on America First v. 1.0!
    Charles Lindbergh, who knew something about state-of-the-art aviation technology, saw quite correctly that the momentum of German re-armament during the 1930s, particularly in the excellence of their aircraft, would put the US at grave risk if we initiated war with the Nazis before our own military aircraft design and production were vastly ramped up.
    In truth, the calibre of German aerospace technology (check out the ME-262 at the USAF Wright-Pat museum… not to mention Von Braun’s V2 ballistic missiles) continued to surpass our own throughout WW2.
    The definitive —and family-authorized— Lindbergh biography by Stephen Berg (a Jew, incidentally) certainly doesn’t paint him as a frothing antisemite.

    Like

  5. Alan Potkin Avatar

    Further to the previous posting, in his inaugural address yesterday, President Trump just did effectively declare war on the most rabid and dangerous species of Jew haters now out there… Do you have a problem with that?

    Like

  6. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Lovely fella, that Lindbergh – “We can have peace and security only so long as we band together to preserve that most priceless possession, our inheritance of European blood, only so long as we guard ourselves against attack by foreign armies and dilution by foreign races.”

    Like

  7. Alan Potkin Avatar

    The Israelis have their own de-facto iteration of Lindbergh’s quoted ideology (where’s the reference/link to that?) and take the strongest measures to implement/ enforce it. Is that equally unlovely?
    I myself find neither case to be utterly “deplorable”; to use the ill-considered term of art which so effectively whacked the Clinton candidacy.

    Like

  8. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Link to the Lindbergh quote – http://library.flawlesslogic.com/lindy.htm

    Like

  9. Hal Avatar
    Hal

    @Alan Potkin,
    “…our inheritance of European blood…” Israel? Over half the population is Sephardi, Mizrahi or Ethiopian. Though the Sephardi, Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews are all genetically related. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Jews
    The “so long as we guard ourselves against attack by foreign armies” quote, however, undoubtedly applies.

    Like

  10. Hal Avatar
    Hal

    Mick,
    I’d never seen that piece by Lindbergh. And published in Reader’s Digest ?!

    Like

  11. Alan Potkin Avatar

    Obviously, the “European blood” part wasn’t intended to be apposite to the Israeli situation. But “Jewish blood” —Sephardi, Misrachi, and Ashkenazi— works fine. FWIW, Readers Digest was created by and published throughout his long lifetime by Walter Annenberg, son of Moses “Moe” Annenberg, whose paternal ancestry was Prussian Jewish. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, of which former president Obama was the CEO, hand-picked —by silver spoon revolutionary Wm. Ayers, “just a guy from the neighborhood”— in just three years flushed $130M of mostly Annenberg Foundation money into the sewers of the Chicago Public School system, with no detectable lasting positive outcome (other than to its own former executives)!

    Like

  12. Stephen K Avatar
    Stephen K

    I doubt Trump knows the provenance of the phrase, and if he knows I doubt he cares. He’s probably trolling.
    That said, having read his inaugural address, there is little or nothing in it that I couldn’t imagine Clinton saying.

    Like

Leave a reply to Hal Cancel reply