In the West, we have come to expect superficial analyses of political Islam in general and the Muslim Brotherhood in particular.

How fortunate we are, then, to have Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of the movement's founder, to set us straight in the pages of the NYT.

And we're even more fortunate to have Barry Rubin, to point out what a load of nonsense Ramadan's cosy little whitewash really is. For instance:

“The Muslim Brothers began in the 1930s as a legalist, anti-colonialist and nonviolent movement that claimed legitimacy for armed resistance in Palestine against Zionist expansionism during the period before World War II. The writings from between 1930 and 1945 of Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Brotherhood, show that he opposed colonialism and strongly criticized the fascist governments in Germany and Italy. He rejected use of violence in Egypt, even though he considered it legitimate in Palestine, in resistance to the Zionist Stern and Irgun terror gangs. He believed that the British parliamentary model represented the kind closest to Islamic principles.”

This is a lie so shameless that Ramadan knew he was fabricating just to fool the Western audience. The Brotherhood was founded by his grandfather in 1928. It was not only anti-colonialist but, as noted above, intent on gaining power for itself and suppressing the other anti-colonialist movements, be they liberal, leftist, or nationalist. The idea that his grandfather was a believer in the British parliamentary system is such a huge fabrication that it sounds like a joke.

But “nonviolent”! What about the famous Muslim Brotherhood terrorist unit which assassinated political rivals? His own grandfather was killed in revenge after his men murdered the Egyptian prime minister! To say, “He was assassinated in 1949 by the Egyptian government on the orders of the British occupier,” is of course a typical fabrication, to play on the theme that only imperialists and their stooges opposed the Brotherhood.

What he writes about Zionism is also a lie. The Brotherhood’s attitude toward Jews is full of basic anti-Semitism expressed in virtually every document of the organization. And, of course, the Brotherhood was fighting against any Jewish state long before either the Sternists or Irgun did anything. When his father went off to fight the Jews, he was almost certainly carrying a German rifle supplied to the Muslim Brotherhood by Hitler in 1942.

Among the most profound lies is to claim that the Brotherhood was anti-fascist. In a forthcoming book, Germany, the Nazis, and the Making of the Modern Middle East, Wolfgang Schwanitz and I will show how the Brotherhood was in fact subsidized by the Nazi government in the 1930s through Amin al-Husaini, the mufti, and became a wartime ally of Germany. In 1942, the Brotherhood received German weapons to stage an uprising once the German army entered into Egypt. It also was incorporated in plans to massacre all of the Jews of the Middle East. Ramadan’s grandfather was a Nazi collaborator.

Posted in

10 responses to “Rewriting History”

  1. clazy8 Avatar
    clazy8

    There was a blog called The Daily Ablution, by a guy named Scott Burgess. He went off the air and deleted everything a few years ago, but among his last projects was a pretty extensive expose of The Muslim Brotherhood and Tariq Ramadan. Do you know the blog? I’ve always wondered what became of Scott. Here are the archives on the Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://dailyablution.blogs.com
    One more thing — didn’t Adolph Eichmann go to Egypt and Palestine to meet with the Mufti or his minions?

    Like

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Yes I remember Scott Burgess – though I don’t recall that particular piece on the Muslim Brotherhood. His claim to fame was exposing that Guardian journalist as a member of Hizb-ut-Tahrir. He was an American living in London.
    Don’t know about Eichmann in Egypt. I believe the Mufti spent most of the war in Berlin.

    Like

  3. clazy8 Avatar
    clazy8

    Here’s something from a site called Palestine Facts, http://208.84.118.121/pf_mandate_grand_mufti.php:
    According to documentation from the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, the Nazi Germany SS helped finance al-Husseini’s efforts in the 1936-39 revolt in Palestine. Adolf Eichmann actually visited Palestine and met with al-Husseini at that time and subsequently maintained regular contact with him later in Berlin.
    In 1940, al-Husseini requested the Axis powers to acknowledge the Arab right:
    * … to settle the question of Jewish elements in Palestine and other Arab countries in accordance with the national and racial interests of the Arabs and along the lines similar to those used to solve the Jewish question in Germany and Italy.
    While in Baghdad, Syria al-Husseini aided the pro-Nazi revolt of 1941. He then spent the rest of World War II as Hitler’s special guest in Berlin, advocating the extermination of Jews in radio broadcasts back to the Middle East and recruiting Balkan Muslims for infamous SS “mountain divisions” that tried to wipe out Jewish communities throughout the region.
    At the Nuremberg Trials, Eichmann’s deputy Dieter Wisliceny (subsequently executed as a war criminal) testified:
    * The Mufti was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and adviser of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of this plan. … He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say, accompanied by Eichmann, he had visited incognito the gas chamber of Auschwitz.
    There’s also some interesting discussion of the Mufti and Eichmann by Bernard Lewis: http://books.google.com/books?id=GteStbiDEjAC&lpg=PA160&pg=PA156#v=onepage&q=eichmann&f=false

    Like

  4. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Imteresting. Thanks for that.

    Like

  5. Gibson Block Avatar
    Gibson Block

    Even taking into account that Rubin has a strong bias, he certainly seems to have caught Ramadan red-handed here telling half-stories.
    “He was assassinated in 1949 by the Egyptian government on the orders of the British occupiers.”
    “Following Gamal Abdel Nasser’s revolution in 1952, the movement was subjected to violent repression.”
    No mention at all was made of the Brotherhood’s provocations. But that’s typical of punditry, isn’t it? Salesmen on all sides love to put their best foot forward and hide the full truth.
    PS: Daily Ablution was a great blog. Nice to see it again.

    Like

  6. Trofim Avatar
    Trofim

    Scott Burgess bought a little place in Slovakia, and then went to live there, if I remember correctly.
    Tariq Ramadan, incidentally, was on BBC1’s “You Can’t Take it with You” last week, advising on making a Muslim will. I’m afraid he came across as very pleasant and normal.

    Like

  7. LibertyPhile Avatar

    Tariq Ramadans status as a “reformer” was even rumbled in the Guardian. See the following.
    “Analysis of readers comments on the above Guardian Cif post by Tariq Ramadan 23 February 2010. He has created a record. He has achieved the highest level of disagreement with a Cif post that we have ever found.”
    “4225 votes out of 4359 (97 percent) say he is talking nonsense (and some even suggest he is “opaque and oblique and doesn’t say anything straight out”).
    http://libertyphilesurveys.blogspot.com/2010/01/islam-role-in-ethical-society.html

    Like

  8. TDK Avatar
    TDK

    Scott Burgess now writes here.
    http://whoseideawasthis.typepad.com/whoseideawasthis/
    However it is strictly non-political

    Like

  9. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    No, I hadn’t seen those. Thanks for the links. And the Scott B link – that’s quite a cosy domestic scene they have there.

    Like

Leave a comment