More on the joys of organised religion (see below). From the National Secular Society (via b&w):

The full extent of the regressive nature of the Vatican under Ratzinger was made clear this week when it was revealed that the Vatican had opposed two United Nations resolutions aimed at protecting gay and disabled people from discrimination and death.

When France proposed a resolution seeking all nations to decriminalise homosexuality, the Vatican immediately said it would oppose the resolution. This is despite the fact that up to 70 nations still have legal punishments for gay people including, in some instances, the death penalty. In a number of Islamic countries such as Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen, homosexual acts are still a capital offence….

A strongly worded editorial in Italy's mainstream La Stampa newspaper said the Vatican’s reasoning was “grotesque”.

Franco Grillini, founder and honorary president of Arcigay, Italy’s leading gay rights group, said the Vatican’s reasoning smacked of “total idiocy and madness”. Mr Grillini said the resolution had nothing to do with gay marriage, but was aimed at stopping the execution of gay people in Islamic countries.

An editorial in Rome’s left-leaning La Repubblica newspaper said the Vatican’s position “leaves one dumbstruck”. Margherita Boniver, a leading member of Italy’s leftist Democratic Party, called it “alarmingly anachronistic”.

The gay rights activist, Grillini, said he feared what he called another “Holy Alliance” between the Vatican and Islamic states at the United Nations to oppose the proposed resolution. At a major U.N. conference on the family in Cairo in 1994, the Vatican teamed up with Islamic and Latin American countries to defeat an abortion rights proposal. In October, a leading Vatican official called homosexuality “a deviation, an irregularity and a wound”.

The secretary of the UK’s Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association, David Christmas, described the statement as “ludicrous”. He said: “The accusation that it is in some way discriminatory to attempt to counteract the prejudice and hatred which exists in over 80 countries that outlaw same sex relations would appear to be yet another example of the Vatican turning logical thinking on its head.”…

Meanwhile the Times has revealed that the “Holy See” also refused to sign a UN document last May on the rights of the disabled because it did not condemn abortion or assert the rights of foetuses with birth defects.

Posted in

4 responses to “The Vatican and Homosexuality”

  1. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    There’s not much point in the Roman Catholic church unless it is “alarmingly anachronistic”. Otherwise Catholics might as well convert to Christianity.

    Like

  2. tolkein Avatar
    tolkein

    What, precisely, were the terms of the resolutions or documents on homosexuality and the disabled? The Church has a track record of protection of the disabled against the likes of eugenicists. On this I don’t trust the National Secular Society, La Repubblica or the Gay & Lesbian Humanist Association for an impartial or non tendentious reporting of the facts.

    Like

  3. Mick Hartley Avatar

    The National Secular Society, or the Gay & Lesbian Humanist Association, wouldn’t claim to be impartial. If you think they’ve misrepresented the Vatican’s position though, surely it’s up to you to show in what way.

    Like

  4. maguro Avatar
    maguro

    Shockingly retrograde. But does anyone really think a UN resolution would do anything to stop the persecution that is going on in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen?

    Like

Leave a reply to maguro Cancel reply