Further to the Steve Jones theory about the end of human evolution, there's a post by PZ Myers at Panda's Thumb on yet another way in which he may well be proved wrong – the Caesarean section:

While Steve Jones might think human evolution has stopped, I have to say that that is impossible. If human technology removes a selective constraint, that doesn't stop evolution โ€” it just opens up a new degree of freedom and allows change to carry us in a novel direction.

One interesting potential example is the availability of relatively safe Cesarean sections. Babies have very big heads that squeeze with only great difficulty through a relatively narrow pelvis, so the relationship in size between head diameter and the diameter of the pelvic opening has been a limitation on human evolution. We know this had to be a factor in our evolution: the average newborn mammal has a cranial capacity that is roughly 50% of the adult size, chimpanzee babies have heads about 40% of the adult size, but human babies have crania that are only 23% of what they will be in adults. While our brains have gotten larger over evolutionary time, they have not gotten proportionally larger in utero, because large-headed babies increase the difficulty of labor and cause increased mortality in childbirth. If childbirth could bypass the pelvic bottleneck, that would allow for fetal heads to grow larger without increasing the risk of killing mother and/or child.

And childbirth is a risky proposition for women; 529,000 die every year from this natural process (although only about 1% of those deaths occur in places where women have access to good, modern medical facilities โ€” hooray for modern medicine). About 8% of those deaths occur from obstructed labor, where the fetus is unable to proceed through the birth canal for various reasons, and these are the kinds of birth problems that can be circumvented by C-sections. In practice, teaching health care workers how to carry out emergency C-sections has been tested in regions in Africa, where it has actually worked well at reducing maternal mortality. 

This is the subject of an article by Joseph Walsh in the American Biology Teacher, which suggests that C-sections will have an effect on human evolution.

"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." This was the title of an essay by geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky writing in 1973. Many causes have been given for the increased Cesarean section rate in developed countries, but biologic evolution has not been one of them. The C-section rate will continue to rise, because the ability to perform a safe C-section has liberated human childbirth from natural selection directed against too small a maternal pelvis and too large a fetal head. Babies will get bigger and pelves will get smaller because there is nothing to prevent it.

Myers is unconvinced by the evidence to date, but, as he says, it's a tantalising idea:

Even as a purely theoretical exercise, though, what it does say is that it is obvious that human culture cannot end human evolutionโ€ฆall it can do is shape the direction in which it can occur.

Posted in

10 responses to “Brain Size and Evolution”

  1. Alcuin Avatar
    Alcuin

    Just a few disconnected thoughts:
    1) I think Steve Jones was flying a kite. Many non-scientists do not seem to appreciate that when a scientist makes a suggestion, it is just that – here’s an idea, let’s see how far it goes. He was just doing it in public, and so the sanctimonious, facile and technically illiterate media pounced on it as an example of a mad scientist.
    2) I believe that gestation time has reduced over the past million years from about 1 year to 9 months, mainly to accommodate the increasing head size. The human infant is relatively helpless at birth, due to the need for the brain to develop more after birth.
    3) I read recently that autistic children have larger heads and brains, that their brains are overloaded by stimuli and that as a result they withdraw to shut out the noise. Could this be a limit of some kind?
    4) New Scientist (13/09/2008) reports that modern adults (and the final Neanderthals) have smaller brains that those of their ancestors, suggesting that a faster birth rate won over higher intelligence. This slight advantage may have been crucial in our survival and Neanderthals demise.
    5) In an episode of Blake’s Seven, a planet was being used by the Federation as a laboratory for accelerated evolution. The result was rather like the apes in 2001. Could happen.
    6) Male-bonded coalitional violence (essentially murder raids against adjacent tribes) has a very long pedigree, going back to before we split with chimpanzees about 6M years ago. It is in our genes, and shows up whenever legal and social restraints are removed, or when resources are scarce. War will continue to shape our future. Lest any women feel superior about their gender, such behaviour only propagates due to their choice of successful warriors as spouses.
    http://richarddawkins.net/article,1710,We-Few-We-Happy-Few-We-Band-of-Brothers,Andy-Thomson-Richard-Dawkins-Foundation

    Like

  2. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    Maybes. I suspect that there is a type of leftie who likes evolution when it can be used to poke fun at American evangelicals, but likes to deny evolution as it applies to humans, now or recently.

    Like

  3. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    going back to before we split with chimpanzees about 6M years ago — alcuin
    LOL!
    Anyways, is it fair to say that Muslims and Africans are Darwinian successes and Chinese, Japanese, Europeans, Russians are Darwinian failures due to the fertility rates we see currently? Driven by culture.
    Is the mass movement of peoples from North Africa/South Asia and Latin America into Europe and North America a sign of cultural Darwinian weakness on the part of White Europeans. Is Religion a successful Darwinian trait?

    Like

  4. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    Perhaps the Chinese and Japanese arent failures, as they do not have an influx of foreign culture immigrants flooding their lands….they have control over the borders and are not squeemish about protecting the heritage and culture from “the Other.”
    Europe seems to be collapsing, though. And this seems to typify the response…..acquiescence to inevitability.
    Sarkozy: โ€œArabic Is the Language of the Futureโ€
    The French government is strongly advocating the teaching of Arabic language and civilization in French schools.
    http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3591

    Like

  5. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Your comments don’t make much sense to me, nwa. Why LOL! in response to Alcuin’s comment? Why are you bringing up all this stuff about Muslims and Africans and Chinese and Japanese? In what way is that of any relevance to my post? And why do we have to have links to the Brussels Journal? Perhaps you’d be better advised to comment there instead of here.

    Like

  6. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    Sorry mick.
    Perhaps I missed the establishment as fact that humans branched off from Chimpanzees 6 million years ago.
    Evolution seems to be the topic. Or perhaps Ive missed something.
    Sorry if its not specific to Brain size of infants.
    I dont know why Ive rubbed you the wrong way.
    Seems to me that besides instictual and cultural sexual selection, and C-Section….more significantly we have genetic engineering/modification which will be the driver of human and other evolution.
    However, the welfare state will continue to produce viable Darwinian failures, and it will continue to promote via victimization politics and equality of outcome socialism, the expansion of otherwise Darwinian failures, the dumb, the poor, the lazy, etc. They seem to be procreating at a higher rate in the West than Atheist PhDs.
    I dont mind commenting at the Brussels Journal….I get around.

    Like

  7. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    Perhaps alcuin could comment over at Dawkins.net…heh? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Like

  8. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    Im a little nutty, and I may grate at times. But Im not a nefarious character. I enjoy your blog, and find interesting and thought provoking ideas here.
    Dont let difference of opinion or political differences stand in the way of communication, open inquiry and discussion. I say.

    Like

  9. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    Well, you know, I’m not saying you’re banned or anything. I was just pointing out that actually, yes, I did find some of your comments grating. I’m glad to hear that you’re not a nefarious character though.

    Like

  10. nwo/escapevelocity Avatar
    nwo/escapevelocity

    LOL!
    “Offensivity” goes with the territory, no?
    You might get to like me, in a grating sort of way.
    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Like

Leave a reply to Mick H Cancel reply