You might think that women walking around in head-to-toe black clothing, with faces veiled to ward off lustful male stares, would be a cause for concern for Western feminists. Well….not necessarily. Here's what Naomi Wolf, author of acclaimed books such as "The Beauty Myth", has to say:

A woman swathed in black to her ankles, wearing a headscarf or a full chador, walks down a European or North American street, surrounded by other women in halter tops, miniskirts and short shorts. She passes under immense billboards on which other women swoon in sexual ecstasy, cavort in lingerie or simply stretch out languorously, almost fully naked. Could this image be any more iconic of the discomfort the West has with the social mores of Islam, and vice versa?

Ideological battles are often waged with women's bodies as their emblems, and Western Islamophobia is no exception. When France banned headscarves in schools, it used the hijab as a proxy for Western values in general, including the appropriate status of women. When Americans were being prepared for the invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban were demonised for denying cosmetics and hair colour to women; when the Taliban were overthrown, Western writers often noted that women had taken off their scarves.

The Taliban were demonised for denying cosmetics and hair colour? They also denied schooling for women, to the extent that they now bomb girls schools and murder anyone daring to teach in them. And the burqa was obligatory for any woman stepping outside her house (if she could persuade her male guardian to let her: you know, for a trip to the market to buy food, say). Still, no doubt anything's better than the oppression of being a Western woman constantly subject to the Male Gaze.

But are we in the West radically misinterpreting Muslim sexual mores, particularly the meaning to many Muslim women of being veiled or wearing the chador? And are we blind to our own markers of the oppression and control of women?

The West interprets veiling as repression of women and suppression of their sexuality. But when I travelled in Muslim countries and was invited to join a discussion in women-only settings within Muslim homes, I learned that Muslim attitudes toward women's appearance and sexuality are not rooted in repression, but in a strong sense of public versus private, of what is due to God and what is due to one's husband. It is not that Islam suppresses sexuality, but that it embodies a strongly developed sense of its appropriate channelling – toward marriage, the bonds that sustain family life, and the attachment that secures a home.

Outside the walls of the typical Muslim households that I visited in Morocco, Jordan, and Egypt, all was demureness and propriety. But inside, women were as interested in allure, seduction and pleasure as women anywhere in the world.

At home, in the context of marital intimacy, Victoria's Secret, elegant fashion and skin care lotions abounded. The bridal videos that I was shown, with the sensuous dancing that the bride learns as part of what makes her a wonderful wife, and which she proudly displays for her bridegroom, suggested that sensuality was not alien to Muslim women. Rather, pleasure and sexuality, both male and female, should not be displayed promiscuously – and possibly destructively – for all to see.

Indeed, many Muslim women I spoke with did not feel at all subjugated by the chador or the headscarf. On the contrary, they felt liberated from what they experienced as the intrusive, commodifying, basely sexualising Western gaze. Many women said something like this: "When I wear Western clothes, men stare at me, objectify me, or I am always measuring myself against the standards of models in magazines, which are hard to live up to – and even harder as you get older, not to mention how tiring it can be to be on display all the time. When I wear my headscarf or chador, people relate to me as an individual, not an object; I feel respected." This may not be expressed in a traditional Western feminist set of images, but it is a recognisably Western feminist set of feelings.

I experienced it myself. I put on a shalwar kameez and a headscarf in Morocco for a trip to the bazaar. Yes, some of the warmth I encountered was probably from the novelty of seeing a Westerner so clothed; but, as I moved about the market – the curve of my breasts covered, the shape of my legs obscured, my long hair not flying about me – I felt a novel sense of calm and serenity. I felt, yes, in certain ways, free.

Is this a 1984-style satire? "War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength" – Islam is feminist, and covering yourself head-to-toe is liberating.
 
Of course you know what she means. If you're obsessed with how people see you, then it might seem like some klind of freedom to do a fancy-dress style shopping trip in the full shalwar kameez (does she really mean shalwar kameez?) and headscarf, so you don't have to worry about your bum looking big; just as it might seem liberating, if you're worried about keeping up with the Joneses, to join a monastery; or, indeed, if you're worried about what to think, with all the confusion of the modern world and the conflicting viewpoints and arguments, to decide that The Truth was written down fourteen centuries ago, and the sum total of your intellectual obligation is to obey your local imam and submit to the will of Allah. But….well, let's say I don't think you should confuse submission with liberation.
 
For a start, it's part of a package. You don't get to walk to the market dressed up like a tent in the morning, then write your article for the newspaper in the afternoon, and give a lecture on female sexuality at a nearby college in the evening. You buy in to the whole deal, which will usually involve subjugating yourself to your male guardian, and accepting that women are worth a whole deal less (quantified in Sharia law as one half) than men. Not quite what the original feminists had in mind…
 
And then there's that business of responsibility. I thought that one of the points of feminism was to make men take control of their sexuality, rather than blaming everything on women. Having women walk around covered up like perambulating black sacks so that they don't excite male lust surely sums up everything that feminism should be fighting against.
 
But then, to argue like that, are you perhaps being Islamophobic? Oh dear, what is a girl to think?
Posted in

5 responses to “The Naomi Wolf Myth”

  1. Noga Avatar

    “I learned that Muslim attitudes toward women’s appearance and sexuality are not rooted in repression” says Naomi Wolf.
    Syrian actor Bassam Al-Kossa answers:
    “Bassam Al-Kossa: …From the age of three or four, the killings of girls begin: “Cover your knees.” “Don’t speak in a loud voice.” “Bring your brother his food.” “Get up, put this there.” “Take this down.” All the while, the “emperor” just sits there… “This is disgraceful,” and “that is prohibited”… Then comes her wedding day, and the mother demands that this oppressed and shackled girl be the epitome of womanhood, seduction, and temptation. You constantly make her fear men and society, yet on her wedding night, at the drop of a hat, she is supposed to transform into a seductive beauty queen, to understand the husband, cooperate with him, and so on. These are double standards. Like my colleague said, this is like a man who beats his son for lying, but when someone calls, he says to his son: “Tell him I’m not home.”
    http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1830.htm

    Like

  2. liamalpha Avatar
    liamalpha

    One sentence in her article brings her whole argument down:
    “… not rooted in repression, but in a strong sense … of what is due to one’s husband”
    Isn’t that called male chauvinistic repression in Western cultures?

    Like

  3. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    “Isn’t that called male chauvinistic repression in Western cultures?”
    And what about this: “The bridal videos that I was shown, with the sensuous dancing that the bride learns as part of what makes her a wonderful wife, and which she proudly displays for her bridegroom …”

    Like

  4. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    Sentences I don’t need to finish: “Ideological battles are often waged with women’s bodies as their emblems, and Western Islamophobia …”

    Like

  5. sackcloth and ashes Avatar
    sackcloth and ashes

    Typical double standards from a so-called feminist in the West. ‘My rights are for me, and for my white sisters, and no one else.

    Like

Leave a reply to liamalpha Cancel reply