After Culture Minister Margaret Hodge, in consultation with English Heritage, decided it was not “fit for purpose”, the brutalist concrete estate in Poplar is now slated for demolition:


Eminent architects including Lord Rogers, Lord Foster of Thamesbank and Zaha Hadid had claimed that the dilapidated housing estate was a modern masterpiece which should be preserved.




Lord Rogers said in a statement tonight: “All the British winners of the Pritzker Prize, the highest international award for an architect, agree that Robin Hood Gardens is one of the greatest modern buildings in the UK.


“There is not one internationally recognised modern architect or academic included in making English Heritage’s recommendation on Robin Hood Gardens to the minister. We should, therefore, deeply question the authority and objectivity of English Heritage in discussing contemporary architecture of this quality.”


The architects had claimed that while the estate had been badly neglected over the years, it should be refurbished rather than demolished.


The estate’s two council blocks, which boast multi-million pound views of nearby Canary Wharf, will now be demolished to make room for a tower of up to 30 storeys which will undoubtedly attract high end buyers from the City.


During a campaign to save the building, it was lauded as a hallmark of brutalist architecture, which involves extensive use of concrete.


Lord Rogers described the estate, designed in 1972 by husband and wife Peter and Alison Smithson, “as good, if not better” than any other modern building in Britain and compared its layout to Bath’s great Georgian crescents.


I’ve often cycled past, and I’ll admit it’s a striking-looking place. I can see why the architects like it:


DSC07223s


Bath’s great Georgian crescents, though? I don’t think so. Would you want to live here?


DSC07225s 


Defenders of the place talk about the state of disrepair that it’s been allowed to fall into, but, although I didn’t go inside the flats themselves, the grounds look in fine condition, and are obviously well tended. If 80% of the residents want to be rehoused, that says all you need to know.


Of course if this wasn’t so near Docklands, where they can put up in its place a new 30-story block for the financiers working in those gleaming Canary Wharf towers, it’d be in no danger: just another sink estate – not nice, but a lot better than some.


[The estate has, needless to say, the obligatory basketball court]

Posted in

4 responses to “Robin Hood Gardens”

  1. Fabian from Israel Avatar

    Amazing, they look just like where I used to work in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In Ciudad Universitaria, where the Faculties of Exact Sciences, Biology and Arquitecture are located. The second picture, mostly.
    Brutalist… yes, totally.

    Like

  2. Nicole Segre Avatar
    Nicole Segre

    ‘Would you want to live here?’ If it was renovated, cleaned, gardens landscaped, washing lines removed, plants placed on balconies (although I can’t quite make out if there are any), why not? It would probably look a lot better than the ‘high-end’ tower they propose to replace it with.

    Like

  3. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    As I said, the grounds are already well looked after – landscaped, even. The place isn’t run-down. I don’t believe it would ever be much more liveable than it is now, unless it was renovated into something completely different. I do actually like the look of it: some “brutalist” stuff is fine – the Barbican, for instance. But that 80% figure wanting out is pretty damning. People just don’t like living there.
    Whether the replacement will be better, well, we’ll have to wait and see. High-rise apartmnet blocks – especially for the wealthy – are a lot better designed, I think, than they used to be.

    Like

  4. dearieme Avatar
    dearieme

    “Culture Minister Margaret Hodge”: the Stalinists threw ’em up and the Stalinists tear ’em down. Blessed be the Stalin.

    Like

Leave a reply to Nicole Segre Cancel reply