Those who are interested in watching Geert Wilders’ film Fitna (Wikipedia link) will no doubt have seen it by now. It’s not difficult to find, despite Livelink removing it from their servers as a result of threats received. It’s pretty much what you’d expect: footage of terrorist outrages, interspersed with clerics preaching jihad and quotes from the Koran: nothing that anyone who’s inclined to give it a view won’t be familiar with already. It’s perhaps less offensive than many feared, though it’s early days yet to judge the overall reaction of the Muslim world. Omar Bakri, interestingly, didn’t find it offensive at all: “If we leave out the first images and the sound of the page being torn, it could be a film by the [Islamist] Mujahideen”.

Anyway, I’m not going to include it here, or link to it. It’s not that I disagree with the substance of it. It seems to me quite obvious, beyond controversy, that Islam is used to justify terrorist outrages, and that there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of Islamic clerics around the world regularly exhorting their congregations to acts of violence against us kuffars, us non-believers. Whether this is intrinsic to Islam, or is, as many like to argue, a perversion of it, is not something I’m particularly well qualified to judge, but my feeling is that, yes, that’s what Islam is like. These clerics aren’t just making it all up, or twisting the words of the Koran or the Hadiths. That there are so many Muslims who live quiet modest lives, with no interest in imposing themselves or their values on others, is more down to the basic decency of the average person than to the teachings of their religion.

Secularism is, clearly and unequivocally, unacceptable to traditional Islam – yet secularism is the bedrock of Western culture. So yes, there’s a problem – but there are Muslims who advocate secularism, and I believe that we’ll see more and more of them. Nor do I think that here in Europe we’re heading for some kind of Eurabia. We – particularly in Britain – were too taken in by the joys of multiculturalism to see what was happening under our noses, but now we’re clearer about the dangers, and we’re seeing ex-jihadis coming out and telling us their stories. We’re by no means out of the woods yet, but I believe we’re at least starting to head in the right direction.

Which brings us back to Geert. He’s a right-wing populist: an incorrigible self-publicist, leader of the Party for Freedom, against immigration from non-Western countries, and generally, in my view, an unpleasant piece of work. It shouldn’t be forgotten that he thinks the Koran should be banned in the Netherlands. As he knows, this isn’t going to happen. His motives are, to say the least, dubious. Geert Wilders is presently, without a doubt, the best known Dutch politician outside Holland: a situation with which he’s no doubt very happy. Which is not necessarily to say he’s only in it for the publicity. He may be, but I imagine he genuinely believes that Islam will never adapt to Western culture – and Allah knows there’s certainly enough evidence to support him in that belief. But there’s something unpleasant about Fitna. Whatever you may think about Islam, to make a film so hostile to the beliefs of an immigrant minority, when there’s a real danger of backlash by the native Dutch, is just plain nasty. He’s stirring up trouble, intentionally. He’s going in the wrong direction.

So that’s the problem as far as I’m concerned. It’s a tricky one, no doubt about it. I think he’s right, in general, about Islam, but I don’t think he’s being fair to Muslims, and particularly to those Muslims in Holland – in Europe generally – who are happy to live in a secular society and just get on quietly with their lives. He’s not helping them at all, the very people we should surely be encouraging. It’ll just confirm their more confrontational co-religionists in their belief that it’s an all-or-nothing, win or lose situation.

It also lends credibility to those who complain that the West just likes to insult Muslims, or those like the UN’s Ban Ki-Moon who want to ban the film:

I condemn, in the strongest terms, the airing of Geert Wilders’ offensively anti-Islamic film. There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence. The right of free expression is not at stake here. I acknowledge the efforts of the Government of the Netherlands to stop the broadcast of this film, and appeal for calm to those understandably offended by it. Freedom must always be accompanied by social responsibility.

Next stop, a general ban on offending religion sensibilities. Thanks Geert.

The film should certainly not be banned, and Muslims should learn to take criticism like everybody else, but it’s hard to deny that Wilders did set out to offend.

Posted in

4 responses to “Wildersness”

  1. Alcuin Avatar
    Alcuin

    “it’s hard to deny that Wilders did set out to offend”
    As David Thompson points out in his update to his post on this issue, it is not possible to discuss the issue of Islamic Fundamentalism (Islamism, Islamofascism, whatever) without going to the root of the problem – Mohammad and his Koran. It is therefore not possible to discuss it without giving offence. I am a little surprised at you, Mick, for not realising the problem that anyone who wishes to challenge the tenets of Islam, such as Wilders, Hirsi Ali, and others, has: viz. it cannot be done without giving offence. The charge that you lay at Wilders is therefore facile and irrelevant.
    I do not see a man who intends to offend, I see a man driven by frustration at the lack of any serious debate, and who wants the fundamentals on the table where we can apply reason to them. The “offence” that Muslims take at any attempt to open a robust debate must be seen for what it is – a shallow ploy to shut it down.

    Like

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    I’m sorry but I’m not prepared to view Wilders as some kind of free speech martyr struggling to get his message across – very much unlike Hirsi Ali, who’s managed to “challenge the tenets of Islam” with dignity. Wilders knows exactly what he’s doing.
    Yes of course, the offence which so many Muslims take at any criticism is very much the problem, and that’s what Wilders is playing with.
    Rather than a man “driven by frustration at the lack of any serious debate” I see a demagogue willing to stir up trouble for his own political ends. The fact that I think in many ways he’s right in what he says doesn’t change my view of him.

    Like

  3. Alcuin Avatar
    Alcuin

    You may be right, who knows what is in a man’s soul? He has put his life on the line for this – that says something about his sincerity, doesn’t it? Time will tell anyway, so I will reserve judgement.
    If social cohesion is that fragile that one short film can shatter it, we are in deeper trouble than I thought. If it is not, then there is no need for a fuss.
    Regards.

    Like

  4. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    This is simply one ideology doing it’s damnedest to impose itself on everything everywhere. One in a long line of many.
    You can submit or you can resist; there’ll be no fence sitting while this plays out.
    You see the violence as quirks, MH, I see the moderates as odd men out.

    Like

Leave a reply to Alcuin Cancel reply