It’s a kind of reductio ad absurdum, this teddy bear business. It was possible, perhaps, to defend the Islamic reaction to the Rushdie affair, and indeed many of our great and good did just that. All those rioting Muslims were, clearly, deeply offended, and though we may not fully understand such a reaction in our secular age, we should nevertheless respect their feelings. And then a few years later we had the Motoons affair, and once more we had rioting Muslims, and once more, though perhaps with less conviction, we had those who argued that, yes, well, it may seem odd to us, but really if these kind of things provoke them to such an extent then shouldn’t we, perhaps, respect their sentiments and avoid giving offense? And the question hovered in the air, well, just how far does this respecting of feelings go? How trivial does the offense have to be?

And now we have our answer: there’s no limit. It goes as far as naming teddy bears. It’s as petty and trivial and infantile as that. We have adults, grown men (didn’t see many women) demonstrating on the streets of Khartoum, demanding that a woman who taught a class where they gave a teddy bear the name Mohammed should be taken out and shot. It just doesn’t get any more pathetic than this. Are we still talking about having respect for their outraged feelings? What does John Berger think now, or John le Carré?

Watching the news, as we go over to Our Correspondent in Khartoum, it’s difficult to maintain the normal level of seriousness that one usually brings to these situations. You’re waiting for someone to break the spell, to shout out, oh for fuck’s sake!…this is teddy bears we’re talking about! We’re dealing with idiots! But the standard requirement that we must treat these subjects with due solemnity and respect means that, as yet another clown explains why a punishment of 15 days in jail is nowhere near harsh enough for such a sin, the interviewer nods understandingly, for all the world as though it was a case of one rational adult talking to another, when they should be spluttering with incredulity – “and this is for…for naming a teddy bear? Are you completely out of your mind?”

I don’t want to imagine the next stage. There’s a possibility, I suppose, that a significant portion of the Islamic world will begin to wonder if they really want their religion to become a laughing stock, and might start some kind of reassessment. Muslims here in Britain seem to have realised that this is an offense too far, an embarrassment. But I wouldn’t count on improvements any time soon.

Posted in

15 responses to “An Offense Too Far”

  1. Steve M Avatar

    The fact that such a vast majority of British Muslims are embarrassed by this nonsense leads me to suspect that most Sudanese feel the same way. This is a smokescreen laid down by the Sudanese government to deflect attention from their resistance to UN and International efforts to stop the rapes and massacres in Darfur. Why pick on Britain? Because they know they can achieve maximum exposure with minimum risk.

    Like

  2. Bob-B Avatar
    Bob-B

    What could they try next? Maybe that’s it’s offensive for an infidel to have a name beginning with ‘M’. Better watch out.

    Like

  3. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    I don’t really buy this idea that it’s all a deliberate ploy by the Sudanese government. I think it’s more an effect of the deliberate hardline anti-Western Muslims-as-victims rhetoric which is so prevalent. That’s something the government has a great deal of responsibility for – the general atmosphere, rather than a particular case like this.

    Like

  4. Fabian from Israel Avatar

    Indeed, PARENTS complained about the teddy bear naming. There are such idiots in the world, not everything has a rational explanatoin.
    And exactly what Mick wrote in his posts. Why is there nobody to say “FFS it is a teddy bear! you are idiots!”
    (probably because the reporter wants to get out of there alive).
    I can’t wait for the clash of civilizations to really begin. This has to end now.

    Like

  5. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    “There’s a possibility, I suppose, that a significant portion of the Islamic world will begin to wonder if they really want their religion to become a laughing stock, and might start some kind of reassessment.”
    I wouldn’t count on it. These’d be the same folks that turn out by the thousands, to riot over cartoons and books they’ve never seen or read, and couldn’t if they wanted to through self imposed illiteracy.
    Those living in Western cultures aren’t total idiots, they recognize the absurdity by contrast with their daily lives.

    Like

  6. Alcuin Avatar
    Alcuin

    “we should nevertheless respect their feelings”
    I am surprised to see even you falling for this fallacy, Mick, though the rest of your post is spot on and dilutes the point considerably – but it was NEVER true as an axiom. Should I respect the feelings of the crocodile that was trying to eat me? Or would I try to kick it in the nuts? I, among the vast majority of Britons, was deeply offended by the anti-Cartoons march in London – among many other things. As far as they are concerned, so what?
    While it was thought that there was only a tiny minority of Muslims who wanted to enslave us, a certain disdain for them could be excused, just as you could respect the feelings of a child who has broken his favourite toy. Big mistake, as Londonistan, Theo van Gogh, the Bainlieus and the cartoons march have shown us. The child is now a brat, growing into a thug. In addition, now that we know that it is a large minority in our own country, and a majority in many Muslim countries, such a benign posture can NOT be excused.
    We have to tell them that the Laws of this land are made by us, not Imams; that Mohammed was not a paragon of virtue; that the Jews have a right to a country and are not descended from apes and monkeys; that toleration of misogyny, homophobia, anti-Semitism, dhimmitude and the murder of apostates and blasphemers is not acceptable; that Muslims did not invent algebra, the astrolabe, Arabic numerals, the number zero; nor did Muslims translate the works of Aristotle (they got others to do it). If that upsets their feelings, then it is high time they got used to it.
    The political tricks that such people are prepared to play are so far beyond our credibility that they take our breath away, which is what they are meant to do. So we must accept that they do have an effect on us – but only when we are trying to be reasonable. Arafat, for example, stated point blank at the Camp David summit, that the second Temple in Jerusalem never existed. At that point, Clinton and Barak should have just walked out and told Arafat to get knotted. But despite the outrageousness of this ridiculous lie, so much had we invested in the peace process, and so desperately did we want it to succeed, that we just let it pass. The Arab lie factory had just scored another hit. This affair in Khartoum is just such a ploy, and the only way to stop further humiliation is to just plain get rude, and start playing hardball.

    Like

  7. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    “we should nevertheless respect their feelings” – I was just presenting the argument as it was stated at the time. It’s not a position I ever held myself.

    Like

  8. tyciano Avatar
    tyciano

    how many teddy bears have been named jesus?

    Like

  9. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    All the Latino ones, ‘tyciano’. 😉

    Like

  10. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    Oh hang on; That’d be the male ones! the females are Maria…

    Like

  11. Steve M Avatar

    This incident has little to do with teddy bears or Mohammed and everything to do with throwing up a smokescreen to help Sudan continue to resist UN and Western efforts to halt the rape, slaughter and ethnic cleansing in Darfur.
    Now, Jean-Marie Guehenno, the United Nations peacekeeping chief, has said that the obstacles raised by Sudan are putting in doubt the planned deployment of a peacekeeping force for Darfur.
    Is the UN any use whatsoever?
    (more at blogolob.net)

    Like

  12. Eric Avatar

    This incident has little to do with teddy bears or Mohammed and everything to do with throwing up a smokescreen to help Sudan continue to resist UN and Western efforts to halt the rape, slaughter and ethnic cleansing in Darfur.
    It’s probably a bit of both isn’t it? Depending on who you are looking at.

    Like

  13. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    It’s worth remembering a small but important point. Even the official crime with which this woman is charged does not hold up. She did not name a Teddy Bear after the Muslim prophet. It was named after a boy in the classroom, and the other children voted on it.
    The same is true with the Danish cartoons. We forget, because it makes an absurd situation even more absurd, that the cartoons did not cause offense. They were reprinted in an Egyptian newspaper and no one noticed. The offensive cartoons were drawn by the Imams themselves.

    Like

  14. JEff Avatar
    JEff

    its not journalists fault to tell people they’re stupid.

    Like

  15. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    But maybe their job?

    Like

Leave a comment