I sneered last week at John Derbyshire’s comments on the British sailors in Iran, where he suggested they should be shot, and pronounced that his old Mum would never have behaved like Faye Turney did, wearing that scarf (“I’ll be damned if I’ll wear the filthy thing”, is what she’d have said apparently, probably adding “you Persian fiend!”). I thought the piece was self-evidently absurd, but from the reactions I’ve been reading in America to the release of the sailors, it looks like Derbyshire was only articulating a common sentiment over there. The level of vitriol is astonishing, from Charles Krauthammer ranting about Britain’s humiliation, and how it was the Americans, as usual, who had to rescue the pathetic Euroweenies (did I miss something?), to some military type linked at lgf who says it’s the most disgraceful thing he’s seen in 40 years (and OK, I know lgf comments should be avoided, but still…). Best of all here’s Ralph Peters in the New York Post:

It was a fitting image of the 14 wimps and a sob sister arriving back in the United Kingdom yesterday: skulking away with pink goody bags in hand.

The color was no accident – although yellow would’ve been more appropriate. […]

In a sharp signal of the difference between our military and the politically beleaguered Brits, our chief of naval operations gave an interview to CNN (which he knows the Iranians watch), making it clear that if Tehran tried such a stunt with our sailors and Marines, we’d feed their thugs to the sharks.

The admiral also stressed that if captured, our troops are still taught to give name, rank, service number – and very little else.

Those blubbering Brits were only playing dress-up in the military uniforms they happily swapped for Iranian loan-shark suits at Wednesday’s kissy-face meet-and-greet with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

I’m genuinely baffled. What is it with this comic-book tough-guy heroism? No doubt there’s more to come in the way of revelations, but I thought the service men and woman behaved with dignity in a difficult situation, and I thought the whole thing was handled reasonably well by the Blair government. We got them released, unharmed, without any concessions. And I don’t see this as a propaganda triumph for Iran at all: far from it, I think they’ve ended up doing their international image no good at all.

So why this wave of disgust from across the Atlantic? Is it an anti-British thing? Or is there a raw nerve? – you know….hostages….Iran….that type of thing. Remember Operation Eagle Claw, to rescue the US hostages in Tehran in 1980?

An unforeseen low-level sandstorm caused two of eight helicopters to lose their way en route to Desert One, but only after men and equipment had been assembled there. A third helicopter suffered a mechanical failure and was incapable of continuing with the mission. Without enough helicopters to transport men and equipment to Desert Two, the mission was aborted. After the decision to abort the mission was made, one of the helicopters lost control while taking off and crashed into a C-130. In the ensuing explosion and fire, eight US servicemen were killed: five USAF aircrew in the C-130, and three USMC aircrew in the RH-53. During the evacuation, six RH-53 helicopters were left behind intact (5 of their serial numbers are 158686, 158744, 158750, 158753, and 158758). These six helicopters now serve with the Iranian Navy. In their haste to quickly evacuate the RH-53s, the aircrews inadvertently left behind classified plans that identified CIA agents within Iran.

And if you want real toe-curling abasement before Iranian power, it’s difficult to beat those American Christian leaders in their recent audience with Ahmadinejad.

Am I being petty here, scoring cheap points? Well yes, I am, but I find this all strangely annoying. It brings out the nationalist in me. Maybe it’s a minority view in the US – I certainly hope it’s a minority view – but really, if this is how Americans react to the difficulties of their closest ally, then – how would Oscar Wilde have put it? – fuck ’em.

It’d be sad if this Iranian stunt had the unforeseen consequence of driving a wedge between Britain and the US.

Posted in

8 responses to “Two Countries Divided”

  1. expatmike Avatar
    expatmike

    Though I generally agree with things you say, I think you’re wrong on this one, Mick. OK, so all the tough guy posturing by wheelchair warrior Krauthammer is over the top. But that said, how is co-operating with an Iranian propaganda stunt “behaving with dignity”? Why all the apologising and criticising of their government. etc.? Why didn’t Why didn’t the captured servicemen (and woman) just give name, rank and serial number and then keep quiet? That would have been dignified, I would have have thought. Don’t forget, the Iranians tried to capture an American patrol a month or so ago. The isolated American soldiers fought back and were eventually able to withdraw in good order.

    Like

  2. Anthony Avatar

    Mike,
    You have been taken in by Iranian propaganda hook, line, and sinker. Go and read what the sailors said yesterday about their experience yesterday, rather than taking the Iranian edited video footage at face value.

    Like

  3. John Barr Avatar
    John Barr

    “We got them released, unharmed, without any concessions”
    If you believe this, you missed the whole point of Krauthammer’s column. The fact that they got their agent back in exchange for the sailors will certainly encourage Iran to try this little maneuver again in the future. Not a good outcome.

    Like

  4. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    I’m sort of on the fence here. My only observation might be that if the Marines gave as up as much propaganda material as they did, with only minimal coercion, what would they have given up under exreme duress? Convoy schedules? Names of Iraqi sources?
    Every serving serviceman/woman should undergo the ‘captive experience’ before being sent into theatre.

    Like

  5. Noga Avatar

    I’m glad they are all back, alive and well. But I think there is a lesson to be learned here. If these same marines were patroling the English channel against some enemy, entrusted with the security of their own people, would they have made the same quick decision to surrender which they did in this case? What it makes clear is that people are not willing to risk their life for someone who is not their kin. In this case, the Iraqis.
    Which makes me wonder about the whole concept of “Humanitarian intervention” which the Euston Manifesto supports. How really feasible is it? How can the UN impose or expect the kind of soldierly “loyalty unto death” on its humanitarian missions which is probably essential to their success?

    Like

  6. Dom Avatar
    Dom

    Well, I’m confused too. This was hardly an Iranian victory, and I’m surprised that so many over here want to make it look that way. The whole Easter gift thing was silly. I really wish this would play itself out by everyone, both in Europe and America, praising the way Blair walked a tight-rope.
    Although I think it was petty of you to quote that bit about Eagle claw. That was Carter. We’ve blocked him out of the national conscious.

    Like

  7. mike Avatar
    mike

    Anthony: I wasn’t taken in. I always assumed some kind of pressure or manipulation. What I would have hoped for is a bit more resistance. Now the captives are selling their stories to the tabloids. Dignified? Not really.

    Like

  8. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    “…First Sea Lord Jonathon Band, the head of the Royal Navy, confirmed boarding operations involving British forces had been suspended.
    “For the moment we have stopped UK boarding operations,” Band told BBC radio. “We will obviously do a complete review.”
    http://www.netscape.com/viewstory/2007/04/07/-iran-urges-uk-goodwill-on-sailors/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2007%2FWORLD%2Fmeast%2F04%2F07%2Firan.sailors%2Findex.html&frame=true
    A dime short and a fortnight late, Sir.

    Like

Leave a reply to Noga Cancel reply