• The case of MP Mike Freer, forced to resign because of threats from Islamic extremists, received little attention in the news last week and has already passed into forgotten history. Tom Slater at Spiked:

    Freer’s resignation has become the latest depressing victory chalked up by Islamists against British democracy. A group calling itself Muslims Against Crusades began the rage against him, menacing him more than a decade ago with posts showing images of Stephen Timms – the Labour MP stabbed in 2010 by an al-Qaeda fangirl in east London – alongside the words, ‘Let Stephen Timms be a warning to you’.

    During an event at a North Finchley mosque, members of Muslims Against Crusades reportedly rushed in and denounced Freer as a ‘Jewish homosexual pig defiling the house of Allah’. While not Jewish himself, Freer has long borne the brunt of Islamist anti-Semites, who are now riding high following Hamas’s pogrom in southern Israel.

    Freer has good reason to fear that the threats on his life might be genuine. On the evening of 16 September 2021, he was due to do a constituency surgery but was summoned to Whitehall at the last minute. It was a change of schedule that could well have saved his life. It left Ali Harbi Ali, an aspiring Islamist terrorist, waiting in vain for Freer outside his constituency office, clutching a knife.

    A month later, Ali used that same knife to stab Tory MP David Amess 21 times, killing him in cold blood at his constituency surgery in Leigh-on-Sea. Ali had drawn up a list of MPs – including Freer, Michael Gove and Keir Starmer – who had voted in favour of bombing ISIS in Syria. He said he wanted to ‘send a message’ to politicians that ‘something like that will always have a response’….

    So, over the past 15 years, among all the other carnage they have inflicted on society, Islamist terrorists have stabbed one Labour MP, killed one Tory MP and – with the Westminster Bridge attack of 2017 – launched a car-and-knife attack on the Houses of Parliament, killing five people including policeman Keith Palmer. Now they have terrorised another MP out of public life.

    There have been numerous foiled attacks on politicians, too. Just weeks after the Westminster Bridge horror, Khalid Ali, a Taliban bombmaker, was tackled by armed police near Downing Street. He was armed with knives. He also said he was there to send ‘a message’ to those in power. A few months later, ISIS supporter Naa’imur Zakariyah Rahman was arrested for plotting to bomb his way into Downing Street and behead Theresa May.

    The response to this sustained, years-long assault on our elected representatives? Not silence, exactly. There has been plenty of chatter and commentary. It’s just been about completely unrelated issues. There has been a desperate attempt to change the subject, and to downplay the threat posed by Islamist extremism.

    Following the murder of David Amess, Tory, Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs all lined up to demand… more kindness on social media. There was even talk of a ‘David’s Law’ to strip social-media trolls of anonymity. They seemed to be under the misapprehension that Amess had succumbed to a particularly nasty Twitter storm, rather than a knife-wielding Islamofascist.

    All this stood in stark contrast to the response to the murder of Jo Cox MP by a far-right extremist in 2016. On that awful day – when relatively little was known about Cox’s killer, beyond eyewitness reports he had shouted ‘Britain first’ as he shot and stabbed her – a Guardian editorial denounced the far right’s ‘rhetoric of Western racism and Islamophobia’, warning of a potential ‘slide from civilisation to barbarism’. Two days after Amess’s murder, the Observer – the Guardian’s sister paper – struck a very different tone in its editorial:

    ‘We know little about the circumstances surrounding the fatal attack on Amess, beyond the fact that the police are treating it as a terrorist incident and are investigating a “potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism”. There will be those who seek to deploy these scant details in service of their political agendas; to politicise this tragedy in such a way is abhorrent.’

    And remember the lecture for civil servants at Kings College, as revealed by Anna Stanley, where the assembled bureaucrats were told that the threat from Islamic extremism was exaggerated, while the real concern was the far right – and Israel, of course.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • At yesterday's hate march:

    Over 10,000 anti-Israel protesters marched through central London on Saturday in a demonstration that featured “intifada” chants, support for Yemeni pirates and placards displaying antisemitic conspiracy theories. 

    One banner declared “the BBC is an arm of the Zionist propaganda machine”, while another stated: “Our media, TV, radio and government are controlled by Zionists.”…

    Some demonstrators called for an immediate ceasefire to the Israel-Hamas conflict. However, outside the gates of Downing Street and near The Cenotaph, calls for intifada as the “only solution” could be heard and leaflets featuring Iranian leader Ali Khamenei were distributed.

    Clean1

    Clean2

    Clean3

    Posters equated Zionism with Nazism and depicted UK and American leaders as Adolf Hitler. Other posters portrayed Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely as demonic.

    Support for Yemen’s Houthis, who have been attacking international shipping in recent weeks, was present throughout the march….

    Two Labour MPs, Apsana Begum and Zarah Sultana, spoke at the protest and a number of trade unions including the NEU, RMT and UCU were represented.

    According to some sources, the Met originally said that the demonstration couldn't go down Whitehall. The organisers said we're going to, like it or not. So the Met said, oh well, OK then.

  • More on Labour's determination to go ahead with that ban on conversion therapy, including a ban on those attempting to dissuade childfren from trying to change sex – an impossibility – through medical mutilation. Joanna Williams:

    Sir Keir is adamant that, on his watch, a conversion therapy ban will be ‘trans inclusive’. In other words, it won’t just outlaw attempts to turn homosexuals straight but, crucially, it will most likely make it illegal to try and change someone’s gender identity. Under a Labour government, facts be damned. If a man thinks he is a woman, it will be against the law to try and persuade him otherwise.

    This trans-inclusivity matters to the Labour party because without it, there’s little to justify calls for a ban on conversion therapy. The days of chemical castration and electro-shock therapy are, thankfully, long gone. A handful of unhappy adults might seek out a vicar to pray with them, but there is no evidence that gay people are being routinely subjected to conversion therapy.

    If it doesn’t include transgender people, Starmer’s proposed ban is pointless.

    No doubt he's aware of that. But Starmer braved the wrath of left activists by pushing hard against Corbyn-era antisemitism, so he's not about to risk another battle against all the trans activists in Labour's ranks – including shadow ministers – when the LGBT+ ticket plays so well to the party faithful. Never mind that, as most people are now only too well aware, the T has no place alongside the LGB – is in fact in opposition to the LGB.

    His proposed ‘full, trans-inclusive ban on all forms of conversion therapy’ is particularly concerning for children. There has been a shocking rise in the number of children, particularly teenage girls, who claim to be transgender. Their first recourse is most likely parents or teachers; informal conversations often determine what happens next. Loving reassurance that the best thing is to wait and see gives children time to grow up and potentially change their minds. Yet banning conversion therapy casts a glare of suspicion over such reassurances. Rather than responding from the heart, parents and teachers will worry about being criminalised. A trans-inclusive conversion therapy ban threatens the intimacy of family relationships.

    Many gender-confused children grow up to be happily homosexual. Ironically, a future ban on conversion therapy could send these youngsters headlong down a path to medical interventions that will ‘trans away the gay’. The most gruesome forms of medical conversion therapy might have had their day. But, under a future Labour government, young lesbians will be able to get their breasts cut off and become straight trans men while gay men can be transformed into hormone-pumped trans women. This is conversion therapy on steroids. Or, more accurately, on testosterone.

    Labour’s allegiance to the rainbow flag means the party will plough on with banning conversion therapy despite the risk such legislation poses to vulnerable children. In his speech to LGBT+ Labour, Starmer also announced plans for tougher hate crime legislation and a promise to ‘modernise the Gender Recognition Act’.

    Sir Keir’s flip flopping eventually brought him to a place where he can say that 99.9 per cent of women do not have a penis. But, it seems, this insight will do nothing to stop Labour making it easier for gender-confused children to be pushed towards medication and surgery and for men to enter women’s spaces. For the sake of family life, children’s health, lesbian and gay rights and women’s safety, it is vital Starmer’s conversion therapy plans are thwarted long before he gains the keys to 10 Downing Street.

  • This is such an extraordinary, shameful tweet from the former Stonewall CEO. 

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Of course no front pages were "glorifying" the killers. Are there no depths to which she won't sink? Stoking the fear so the money keeps rolling in….

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Cuban photographer Raúl Cañibano with Human Landscapes, on show downstairs in Print Sales at the Photographers Gallery:

    Showcasing images taken over three decades, this exhibition celebrates Cañibano’s profound love for his native Cuba.

    Raised in post-revolutionary Cuba and initially a welder by trade, Cañibano's photographic journey began in 1984. Self-taught, and inspired by the art books at Cuba’s National Library, Cañibano soon developed his own style, which he calls “somehow surrealist.” This surrealist sensibility is most evident in his playful use of scale, often contrasting uncannily close-up subjects with distant figures to evoke mysterious affinities and tensions. Everyday scenes take on poetic and mystical qualities tinged with a political edge.

    Canibano5

    Canibano6

    Canibano1

    Canibano2

    Canibano3

    Canibano4

    Canibano7

    Canibano9

    Canibano10

    Canibano11

    Canibano12

    Canibano13
    [Photos © Raúl Cañibano]

  • Blimey.

    A female football fan was banned from matches over social media posts that were deemed transphobic after a “Stasi” spying investigation by the Premier League.

    A special unit set up to root out racism in the game was used to comb through comments made by Linzi Smith, a gender-critical Newcastle United supporter, even though the posts had nothing to do with football. Gender-critical people believe transgender women are not women.

    Gender critical women know that transgender women are not women. What distinguishes them is that they're not willing to be silent and go along with the charade.

    Ms Smith, who is gay and promotes lesbian, gay and bisexual rights and women’s rights, was put under investigation by the police, the Premier League and Newcastle United after expressing strong views on trans ideology on her personal account on X, formerly Twitter.

    The 34-year-old was shocked to discover that the Premier League had compiled a dossier detailing where she lives, works and where she walked her dog. The 11-page “target profile”, marked confidential, included data on “associated aliases” and “vulnerabilities”.

    She was interviewed under caution by police after the dossier was handed to officers by Newcastle United. Officers took just two hours to inform her that she had not committed any crime, but the club, which had spent four months looking into her background, revoked her membership and banned her from games until 2026.

    She is taking legal action in an attempt to overturn the ban, arguing that her right to exercise gender-critical views is protected in law, and that the Premier League’s trawl of her personal social media account constituted a breach of data protection laws….

    The Premier League’s investigation unit, which does not have an official name, is part of its legal department and based at its headquarters in Paddington, west London. It was set up in 2019 to monitor abuse, in particular racist abuse, directed at players.

    The Premier League had trawled through her social media posts to find her date of birth, where she lives, the area where she works, and discover that “they do appear to walk their dog by [XXXX] Church which is just off [the street where she lives].”

    The intelligence was accompanied by a picture Ms Smith had posted on social media of her dog, Chester, which has since died, being walked near the church, and two screenshots of the church and its environs from Google Street View.

    Chilling. No doubt Gary Lineker will be protesting this outrage, um, any minute now………..

  • "At the intersection of river sciences, queer and trans theory, and environmental justice". Underflows: Queer Trans Ecologies and River Justice (via Ophelia B):

    Rivers host vibrant multispecies communities in their waters and along their banks, and, according to queer-trans-feminist river scientist Cleo Wölfle Hazard, their future vitality requires centering the values of justice, sovereignty, and dynamism. At the intersection of river sciences, queer and trans theory, and environmental justice, Underflows explores river cultures and politics at five sites of water conflict and restoration in California, Oregon, and Washington.

    Incorporating work with salmon, beaver, and floodplain recovery projects, Wölfle Hazard weaves narratives about innovative field research practices with an affectively oriented queer and trans focus on love and grief for rivers and fish. Drawing on the idea of underflows―the parts of a river’s flow that can’t be seen, the underground currents that seep through soil or rise from aquifers through cracks in bedrock―Wölfle Hazard elucidates the underflows in river cultures, sciences, and politics where Native nations and marginalized communities fight to protect rivers. The result is a deeply moving account of why rivers matter for queer and trans life, offering critical insights that point to innovative ways of doing science that disrupt settler colonialism and new visions for justice in river governance.

    As Donald Rumsfeld famously remarked:

    Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know. 

    For me, till now, the intersection between river sciences and queer and trans theory would have definitely counted as an unknown unknown.

  • Here we go again:

    The Environment Agency has stripped the words mother and father from its staff policies in an attempt to ensure they are “non-gendered”.

    Bosses at the quango showed off their inclusive credentials when applying for a scheme for top UK employers run by the LGBT lobby group Stonewall.

    In the application, seen by The Times, it said it had swapped mother and father with “primary carer” in its maternity, paternity and shared parental leave policies, making them gender-neutral.

    For access to its buildings, it said that workers could request “more than one passcard … in order to be able to express different identities on different days”.

    The Environment Agency also confirmed that it questioned potential suppliers and contractors about their policies on “homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying and harassment”.

    All of its directors had completed “unconscious bias training” and attended refreshers on a regular basis, the application stated.

    The Environment Agency applied for the Stonewall annual top 100 employers list in 2020 and 2022, a freedom of information request revealed.

    The lobby group’s list enables employers across the public and private sector to show how progressive and inclusive their workplace is.

    Our rivers and lakes are full of sewage pumped in by the greedy and useless water companies, but never mind: as long as they have sound policies on “homophobic, biphobic and transphobic bullying and harassment” we can rest assured the Environment Agency will be happy.