• As Matthew Syed reports, the dangers of birth defects has led to a ban on cousin marriages in Scandinavia:

    A shift of potentially historic significance is under way, perhaps without many people noticing. Last week, after an official inquiry, Sweden moved to ban cousin marriage, following in the footsteps of Norway, which announced the same intention earlier this year.

    The day after the Swedish announcement, Denmark did so too. In the United States, Tennessee banned cousin marriage in April, and other states lacking the edict have placed it under review.

    Syed welcomes this from a cultural rather than a genetic point of view – decreasing tribalism – but it's the genetic factor which is surely the main issue here.

    Pakistan is the country with the highest rate of consanguineous marriages, and the practice has come over here with immigration. A 2005 report, commissioned by MP Ann Cryer, revealed that the Pakistani community accounted for 30 per cent of all births with recessive disorders, despite representing 3.4 per cent of the birth rate nationwide. From that same period Dr Peter Corry, Consultant Paediatrician at Bradford Royal Infirmary, said his hospital saw so many recessive genetic illnesses that it had became a centre of excellence for the treatment of some of them. They'd identified about 140 different autosomal recessive disorders among local children: he estimated that a typical district would see 20 to 30.

    There are indications that the rate of cousin marriages is decreasing. A BBC report from a year ago:

    The number of people in Bradford's Pakistani community who have married a cousin has fallen sharply in the past 10 years, a study suggests. Higher educational attainment, new family dynamics and changes in immigration rules are thought to be possible reasons.

    Juwayriya Ahmed married her cousin in 1988. The 52-year-old teacher says her children once asked her how she and their father met.

    "I was laughing at them. I said I didn't really meet him. My parents took me to Pakistan and my dad said you're going to marry this person. And I sort of knew who he was, but the first time I met him properly was at the wedding," she says.

    "My kids said that was disgusting. And then they told me, 'Don't you dare make us do anything like this.'"

    Ten years ago researchers studying the health of more than 30,000 people in Bradford found that about 60% of babies in the Pakistani community had parents who were first or second cousins, but a new follow-up study of mothers in three inner-city wards finds the figure has dropped to 46%.

    The original research also demonstrated that cousin marriage roughly doubled the risk of birth defects, though they remained rare, affecting 6% of children born to cousins.

    "In just under a decade we've had a significant shift from cousin marriage being, in a sense, a majority activity to now being just about a minority activity," said Dr John Wright, chief investigator of the Born in Bradford research project.

    "The effect will be fewer children with congenital anomalies."

    It's in the right direction, but a drop from 60% to 46% is hardly a major shift.

    Still, whether enforced by law or allowed to change as social customs change, it's at least welcome news that the subject's now being talked about.

  • LGBT Youth Scotland campaigns to introduce gender ideology in Scottish primary schools, with the blessing of the Scottish government. The charity's former chief executive is serving a life sentence for child sexual abuse, but no matter: the money and the support keep pouring in. Joan Smith has the latest:

    There has been yet another twist in the scandal embroiling a Scottish charity for young gay and trans people. A man is reportedly suing LGBT Youth Scotland, claiming that its negligence exposed him to child sexual abuse. The complainant, who can’t be named for legal reasons, is seeking more than £100,000 in damages from the charity, which has faced a series of troubling revelations.

    Last month, LGBT Youth Scotland lost funding from the BBC’s Children in Need after it was revealed that one of the authors of its “coming out” guide for children is a convicted paedophile. So is the charity’s former CEO, James Rennie, who is serving a life sentence after sexually assaulting a baby and being exposed as one of the leaders of Scotland’s biggest paedophile ring. The Times, reporting on the latest legal action, has described the organisation as “discredited”. But its website is unrepentant, boasting about its mission of “making Scotland a place where LGBT+ youth can flourish and thrive”.

    Given the eagerness of public bodies to prove themselves “trans inclusive”, it should come as no surprise that the Scottish Government was one of a number of organisations to lavish funds on the charity (it received £1.4m in all last year, from a range of sources). But it raises questions about what has happened to safeguarding, which should surely be one of the founding principles of charities dealing with vulnerable children….

    But the transformation of LGB organisations into proselytisers for “trans rights” seems to have relegated safeguarding to the back seat. As recently as April this year, when the Cass Report exposed the lack of knowledge about the long-term effects of puberty blockers on young people, LGBT Youth Scotland described them as “wonderful” and opposed a pause in prescribing. “Am I trans?” a box on the charity’s website asks….

    The fear of being labelled “transphobic” has turned some of the country’s best known charities, including the Girl Guides, into a laughing stock. “Girlguiding promotes an inclusive and safe environment where all girls and young women, including trans girls and young women, should feel accepted,” its website declares, tacitly admitting that it’s no longer a girls’ organisation.

    What’s astonishing about this is how quickly it’s happened. In a few short years, safeguarding has been repurposed as a species of prejudice, based not in genuine concern but prejudice against LGBT people. The word “trans” is akin to fairy dust, sprinkled in the eyes of credulous people — and the effects are already becoming apparent.

    The rights of children to be protected from sexual predators has been trumped by the new trans cult. Janice Turner, back in August:

    The oldest and gravest homophobic slur, the justification for Section 28, was that gay men can’t be trusted around children. This myth was rightly demolished, yet since then a collective guilt has tipped the scales the other way. Anyone who raises safeguarding concerns about LGBT groups or individuals risks being called a bigot.

    Ever since the T was added to the LGB.

  • From the Times of Israel:

    Rumors have continued to swirl in recent days over the status of Esmail Qaani, the head of Iran’s extraterritorial Quds Force who hasn’t been seen in public for several weeks.

    Qaani has been conspicuously absent since he traveled to Beirut two days after the massive Israeli airstrike late last month that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and several other top commanders, including an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps deputy commander.

    After unconfirmed reports that he had been killed in a subsequent Israeli strike in Beirut alongside a top Hezbollah leader, claims have now surfaced on Arabic and regional media that while he is alive, Qaani is being investigated by the IRGC, of which his Quds Force is part, on suspicion of involvement in Israeli intelligence infiltration and of playing a part in Israel’s assassination late last month of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah….

    On Thursday, Sky News Arabic reported that Qaani, in the course of interrogations by the IRGC, had a heart attack and was rushed to a hospital. The report also said Qaani’s chief of staff, Ehsan Shafiqi, is under scrutiny.

    All the reports remain unconfirmed, and none could be independently verified.

    Senior Iranians, at the heart of the regime, secretly working with Israel? Or Tehran getting paranoid and flailing around to find a scapegoat for the collapse of their precious Hezbollah?

  • Photographer Vincenzo Pagliuca in the Apennines:

    Throughout the central region of Lazio, Italy, to the southern reaches of the country, Vincenzo Pagliuca traces the Apennines in search of distinctive, solitary houses.

    In a nation that has seen declining populations in many of its regions—famously offering financial incentives to those who willing to move to some small communities—abandoned homes have become a common feature of the rural landscape.

    Pagliuca-5

    Pagliuca-1-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-2-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-4-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-3-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-6-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-14_1000

    Pagliuca-8-1536x1242

    Pagliuca-7-1536x1251
    [All images © Vincenzo Pagliuca]

  • Ramping up arms production for Russia to use in Ukraine – to "strengthen the autonomy of the nation’s defense economy and secure outside money to develop our defense industries". From the Daily NK.

    North Korea’s ruling party has ordered an expansion of weapons production and export plans for the fourth quarter to meet Russia’s military demands. The regime is implementing an emergency strategy to quickly meet Russia’s requests for ammunition for the Ukraine war and double its existing weapons production.

    A source in North Korea told Daily NK on Tuesday that the Central Military Commission “issued emergency tasks for the fourth-quarter arms production and export to the Defense Ministry Department, the Second Economic Committee and major enterprises of the defense industry through Order No. 61351 issued on Oct. 1.”

    Accordingly, on Oct. 2, the Ministry of Defense immediately began implementing the Central Military Commission’s order to strengthen cooperation with Russia by quickly securing the total amount of ammunition exports….

    “The Central Military Commission mentioned in the latest order that it also hopes to secure strategic technology support to strengthen the nation’s self-defense power,” the source said. “It revealed the goal of taking the development of the nation’s own defense industry to the next level in the long term by adopting advanced technology through military cooperation with Russia and greatly increasing the localization rate.” 

    He added: “The Defense Industry Department told related workplaces that the Central Military Commission’s order ‘goes beyond simply increasing arms production – it’s an important, even critical, chance to strengthen the autonomy of the nation’s defense economy and secure outside money to develop our defense industries.'” 

  • The Telegraph on yesterday's events at the LGB Alliance conference:

    Four suspected trans rights protesters attacked a gender-critical conference by releasing hundreds of live crickets into a packed auditorium.

    The stunt threw the annual LGB Alliance conference into chaos, as a room of about 600 people had to be evacuated on Friday afternoon.

    A protester, described as a 17-year-old girl by witnesses, who had been sitting in the crowd, dropped a bag of the insects as one of the final talks of the day was about to start….

    LGB Alliance, which was set up in 2019, promotes the rights of lesbian, gay and bisexual people who disagree with Stonewall’s stance on transgender issues.

    The protest took place at the beginning of a talk by Jamie Reed, a whistleblower who reported the medical treatment of minors at a US gender clinic.

    Ms Barker said: “It was a session about a whistleblower – it was really interesting and very topical – so I don’t know if they picked that one in particular.”

    At one point during her conversation with The Telegraph, Ms Barker stepped away to stamp on a cricket that had reached the stage.

    The final two speeches of the event were cancelled following the protest….

    James Dreyfus, the keynote speaker who appeared in the 1999 film Notting Hill, said he had experienced homophobic abuse from supporters of the gender ideology movement.

    “The current gender movement is undoubtedly the most homophobic movement I’ve witnessed since the early 80s,” he said. “And that is no exaggeration.

    “We all have re-experienced being called ‘f—–g poofs, Aids carriers’ etc.

    “From three very specific groups. Firstly, the mob that is known as Trans Radical Activists. Secondly from those who feel the need to put their preferred pronouns in their online bios.

    “And thirdly, from the ‘allies’, perhaps the most worrisome of all, who understand so little of the facts or indeed what the entire argument is about that I’m continually astonished how usually intelligent people have become so utterly brainwashed.”

    Well quite. Silly teens with orange hair are one thing, but the "be nice" brigade who seem to populate our major institutins are something else.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • No surprise here. On one of those "experts" interviewed by the BBC and others, from the JC:

    Standing in military fatigues beside the IRGC logo, this is the “Iran expert” who caused outrage on the BBC last week with a rant about “chosen people” who believe they “have exceptional rights to the whole region”.

    Posted on social media in 2019 by Iranian academic and BBC pundit Seyed Mohammad Marandi, the caption reads: “This photo was proudly taken… when I was a 16 year old volunteer fighting the US backed invasion of Iran.”

    That unit was the 27th army of Muhammad Rasulullah, an IRGC division that has been described as “notoriously ideological” and was set up by Commander Ahmad Motevaselian, one of the founders of the terror group Hezbollah.

    The picture raises serious questions about how the BBC, Sky and Channel 4 — all of whom used Marandi as a pundit — vet “experts” before broadcasting their views into millions of households.

    Marandi has been promoting Hezbollah and its incendiary narrative about Israel on BBC, Sky and Channel 4 widely since Israel went to war with Hezbollah in Lebanon….

    Marandi’s close links to the top of the Iranian dictatorship also come via his family – his father, Alireza, is Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s personal doctor.

    In an echo of Iranian regime rhetoric, Marandi also celebrated the Hamas terror attacks, writing on social media on October 7 2023: “It's been a great and historic day. Israel can't even defeat the besieged Gazans. How can the regime even contemplate confrontation with Hezbollah, let alone the Islamic Republic of Iran? It's time for colonisers to go back to their homes in Europe and North America.”

    Campaigners and politicians are now asking whether the broadcasters knew about Marandi’s ideological and military background or whether there were vetting failures. 

    The BBC and Channel 4 have referred to Marandi’s links to the Iranian government and role on Iran’s nuclear team in 2015 – when the regime had a more “moderate” president, Hassan Rouhani – during interviews.

    But he is usually introduced as an academic at the University of Tehran, and his links to the very extreme wing of the regime – the Raisi government, the ayatollah and the IRGC – have been omitted.

    Marandi has used his platform to promote Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist group – which he described as “heroes” in a Channel 4 interview earlier this month – and make extreme statements about Israel, which he has accused of carrying out a “Holocaust” in BBC and Sky interviews.

    Kasra Aarabi, director of IRGC Research at United Against Nuclear Iran, told the JC: “Marandi is one of the Iranian regime’s main propagandists. He is the son of the supreme leader’s personal doctor, served in the IRGC – the regime’s terror arm which created Hezbollah – and was even an adviser to the nuclear team under former president and hardline cleric Ebrahim Raisi. Despite this, Western outlets – like the BBC, Sky News and Channel 4 – frequently invite Marandi without disclosing his troubling CV to their audiences, referring to Marandi as simply an ‘Iranian academic’. For an outlet like the BBC, which claims to take impartiality very seriously, the failure to disclose Marandi’s deep affiliation with the regime is a major oversight.”

    Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it was “astonishing that either the BBC failed to do its due diligence or did, and decided hosted him regardless”.

    Lord Austin, who sits as a life peer in the House of Lords, told the JC: “It’s either further evidence of the BBC’s bias against Israel or a newsroom team which is out of control and whose editorial checks are in disarray.”…

    In his October 1 appearance on the Today programme with presenter Mishal Husain, Marandi said: “Just as the UK supports this Holocaust in Gaza… we have no doubt they will be with the Israelis until the very last Palestinian.

    “They are the chosen people, they are your allies.. It’s an expansionist regime, it believes in ethno-supremacism, it believes they are the chosen people, [that] they have exceptional rights to the whole region.”

    Husain did not intervene as he made those statements and instead close the conversation by saying “thank you”.

    The interview prompted outrage from the Board of Deputies, the Jewish leadership Council and community figures including Simon Schama and Simon Sebag Montefiore. The BBC said in response to complaints that Marandi should have been challenged on those comments.

    A spokesperson for CAA said: “When a guest is spewing putrid rhetoric that invokes Holocaust comparisons, the normal thing to do is to challenge them. At the BBC, the normal thing to do is to thank them for coming on the programme. This is a disgrace.”

    It's a familiar feature of Islamist advocacy, to accuse the Jews of precisely what they themselves are guilty of….believing that "they have exceptional rights to the whole region".

  • Women and gays must be prevented from meeting – by any means necesary.

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Update:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Well, we were warned:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Press release:

    Some of the Office for Equality and Opportunity’s key immediate priorities will be:

    • strengthening the legal duty for employers to create and maintain working conditions free from harassment
    • enshrining in law the full right to equal pay for ethnic minority people and disabled people
    • delivering a full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices
    • championing the rights of disabled people
    • focusing on socio-economic disparities

    The real conversion therapy of course is the medical mutilation of gender non-conforming kids who've been deluded into thinking they've benn born in the wrong body. Encouraging them to go through a normal puberty may now be criminalised…

  • After the Holocaust antisemitism became unsayable in polite circles, but it never went away: it just re-surfaced as anti-Zionism. Einat Wilf:

    Starting Oct. 8 last year, inspired by images of Jewish defeat and weakness after the brutal attack on Israel by Hamas terrorists, anti-Zionism exploded worldwide – on university campuses, at international organizations and even in the pages of some respected newspapers. A campaign that had been building for decades, ingeniously devised and methodically executed, has reached its zenith.

    Antisemitism was discredited after World War II, once the world became aware of the horrors that Nazi ideology unleashed, culminating in the Holocaust. Anti-Zionism was created to replace antisemitism, initially by the Soviet Union, which exported it to the world. Intellectual “respectability” was key to its appeal, since ideas – especially the most dangerous and vile of them – must be perceived as respectable for educated elites to uphold them.

    The spread and rise of anti-Zionism over the last several decades has built on what I call “the placard strategy.” It ingeniously employs a simple, repeated equation, understandable to even a kindergartner. On one side is the word “Israel” or “Zionism,” or an image of the Star of David. Then comes an equals sign, followed by one of a litany of words that have become signifiers of evil: Zionism = Racism. Zionism = Apartheid. Zionism = Genocide.

    These words are not chosen because they convey reality. In reality, Zionism is about fighting colonialism, racism, apartheid and certainly genocide. These words are decontextualized and ahistorical, presented to portray Jews, especially those who dared to seek and support sovereignty in their homeland, as evil. These notions are endlessly recycled on placards and through social media and, most consequentially, laundered for respectability through academia and the United Nations.

    Academic analysis and citations are the key to conferring a sense of authority. As Wilson Center scholar Izabella Tabarovsky has shown, this process works by writing papers that are then cross-referenced to create an impenetrable structure of supposed scholarship.

    The placard strategy has also been laundered through the U.N. General Assembly. Consider the 1975 “Zionism = Racism” resolution. When South Africa brought charges of genocide against Israel at the International Court of Justice last December, it was another a page from this playbook.

    The nursery-rhyme repetition of a simple anti-Zionism message in numerous forums – combined with the imprimatur of academia and U.N. bodies – leads to one logical conclusion. If Israel, Zionism and the Star of David are evil, then evil must be eradicated. Think of the latest signs showing a Star of David in a trash bin labeled “Keep the World Clean.” More than any other placard, this one exposes the purpose of the entire project of anti-Zionism: a world without Jews.

    So…what is Zionism, really?

    Zionism is a political movement that started in Europe in the late 19th century for the liberation and self-determination of the Jewish people in their ancient homeland. Nothing more and nothing less. Each part of this description is important.

    A political movement: Some people argue that Zionism is 3,000 years old. The Jewish connection to Zion, the biblical name for Jerusalem – and, by extension, to the land of Israel – has been baked into the Jewish people, their history, their conception of themselves, their rituals and their traditions. When Jews were exiled in Babylon, in the Roman Empire, and eventually in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, the Jews vowed to never forget Zion. In the 19th century, the Jewish people organized themselves into an action-oriented political movement designed to bring about the establishment of a sovereign state for the Jewish people in their ancient homeland.

    For liberation and self-determination: Like other liberation movements, Zionism emerged from the Enlightenment and the rise of liberal ideas. It rests on the belief that liberty and freedom go hand in hand with the political power needed to secure them. This emerged from the tragic understanding that – whether in Europe, Russia, or North Africa and the Middle East – Jews would never be fully accepted as equals. Therefore, a state of their own was necessary for Jews to achieve equality. Liberation depends on the rise of national movements of self-determination where people can live in nation states and citizens can elect governments by the people and for the people. In that respect, Zionism is not unique. Liberation texts from the late 19th and early 20th centuries included the Czechs, Slovaks, Ukrainians, Poles and Jews among the nations that needed to emerge from crumbling empires.

    Of the Jewish people: The Jews are a people and a nation. One of the greatest mischaracterizations of Jews is that they are simply members of a religious faith. The notion of Judaism as a religion emerged in the 18th and 19th century, mostly in Europe, in an effort to fit Jews into the structure of secular republics. The idea was to sever the collective, ancient conceptions of the Jews as a people, a nation, a tribe – what in Hebrew is known simply as “Am” – from the private practices of faith and ritual. Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, proclaimed the movement as a form of emancipation: “We are a people – one people.”

    In their ancient homeland: Before a century-long campaign of erasure, it was widely known and understood that the Jewish people were only ever collectively connected to one land – the land of Israel. The Jews have been exiled and have lived in many places around the world. But as a people and a nation, they have only ever been connected to one land that would make sense as a sovereign nation-state. The Jews have been repeatedly exiled from this land, but they never ceded it. To emerge with their own nation-state, in their ancestral homeland, with their revived ancient language, they had to decolonize themselves from numerous empires – Roman, Islamic, Ottoman, British, to name a few. In that, Zionism is the world’s oldest, most persistent and most successful decolonization movement.

    The enemies of Israel, notably the Islamist Iranian proxies of Hamas and Hezbollah, know perfectly well what Zionism is, and know that it conflicts with their vision of Islamic supremacism in which no Jews are permitted. In which to put it more bluntly, all Jews must be killed. It's an existential struggle now, Zionism.