• Jo Bartosch in the Telegraph on Wes Streeting and the end of puberty blockers:

    Puberty blockers, such as Lupron, were developed for end-stage prostate cancer and are used to chemically castrate sex offenders. Side effects include bone density loss, impacted fertility and lowered IQ. Despite this, they were widely prescribed to children off-label and without proper scrutiny.

    Yet Streeting, once a Stonewall stalwart and member of a Facebook group targeting suspected Terfs in Labour, was previously reluctant to address such evidence. Thankfully, he has now broken away from the partisan briefings of lobby groups. Following in the work of his Tory predecessor Sajid Javid who commissioned the Cass Review, Streeting has done what any responsible politician should; he put the best interests of children ahead of his own career. Trans activists can no longer pretend that caring about children’s health is a part of some Tory culture war plot….

    Nearly a decade ago, I learned about the harm inflicted on children by transgender ideology. Campaigners – whether motivated by concern for women’s rights, safeguarding, or faith – connected through underground networks to expose the scandal within NHS Gender Identity Services. Groups like Transgender Trend, founded in 2015 by Stephanie Davies-Arai, spearheaded efforts from living rooms, not boardrooms. Undeterred by what seemed to be consensus amongst the establishment, and threats from trans activists, grassroots organisers forced the government to pay attention.

    How clinicians were duped into believing that children’s mental suffering could be eased by halting puberty deserves to be investigated as a warning for the future. But how ordinary people fought back must also be recognised and remembered.

    The close of this grotesque experiment on children should give us all hope. The grassroots campaigners who refused to look away have proven Margaret Mead right: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”

    Yes it's a huge step, but there's a long way to go yet.

  • From photographer John Myers:

    Portrait13
    Richard Smith 1973

    Portrait08
    Boy with cactus 1972

    Portrait09
    Butcher’s boy 1973

    Portrait10
    Young Girl 1973

    Portrait12
    Two snooker players 1973

    Portrait14
    Young Boy with ball 1974

    Portrait15
    Mr. & Mrs. Seabourne 1973

    Portrait21
    Mr. Jackson 1974

    Portrait22
    Girl in hood 1973

    Portrait26
    John 1974

    Portrait27
    Robert 1973

    Portrait32
    Mrs. Tate 1973

    Portrait33
    Andrea and monsteria 1974

    Portrait01
    Louise 1975
    [Photos © John Myers]

    RRB Photobook The Portraits.

  • Terry Glavin at the Free Press on The Explosion of Jew-Hate in Trudeau’s Canada. After the October 7th pogrom it was "like a dam burst". A grim catalogue of the surge in antisemitism across Canada – especially, as we've seen elsewhere, in universities and across the Left.

    Then there's this:

    In Liberal circles, a new ideological construction is gaining ground—one that threatens to destroy all that it touches in much the way Critical Race Theory has done. That new idea is “Anti-Palestinian Racism,” defined in such a way as to place Zionism—that is, the view held by the vast majority of Jews—beyond the pale of polite society, and potentially beyond the bounds of Canadian hate speech law.

    According to the Arab Canadian Lawyers Association, anti-Palestinian racism is defined as follows: “Anti-Palestinian racism is a form of anti-Arab racism that silences, excludes, erases, stereotypes, defames, or dehumanizes Palestinians or their narratives. Anti-Palestinian racism takes various forms including: denying the Nakba and justifying violence against Palestinians; failing to acknowledge Palestinians as an Indigenous people with a collective identity, belonging and rights in relation to occupied and historic Palestine; erasing the human rights and equal dignity and worth of Palestinians; excluding or pressuring others to exclude Palestinian perspectives, Palestinians, and their allies; defaming Palestinians and their allies with slander such as being inherently antisemitic, a terrorist threat/sympathizer or opposed to democratic values.”

    It is worth reading that twice. It is a definition of racism that makes the most fundamental defense of Israel’s existence racist. It renders it impossible to describe antisemitism without running the risk of being described as racist.

    Michal Cotler-Wunsh, Israel’s special envoy for combating antisemitism, has some special insight into Canada. The Jerusalem-born 53-year-old former member of the Knesset spent about half her life in Canada. She went to school in Montreal, completed a law degree at Hebrew University, then came back to Canada for a master’s degree. A decade later, she returned to Israel.

    Anti-Palestinian racism is a legalistic rendering of a vulgar slogan routinely chanted at anti-Israel marches across Canada over the past 10 months: “All the Zionists are racists.” Cotler-Wunsh points out the obvious: “APR renders anyone who self-defines or who is identified as a Zionist or just believes Israel has a right to exist as a racist.”

    What we’re witnessing in Canada is the diffusion of “a very particular kind of antisemitism,” Cotler-Wunsh told me. The country’s susceptibility to the “anti-Zionist” iteration of antisemitism is partly because Canadians have lost the capacity to identify with strongly held national values, Cotler-Wunsh argued. “Canadians aren’t especially patriotic,” she said. “So there’s a ‘live and let live’ idea, but it results in indifference.” And that has allowed antisemitism to course through Canada’s institutional bloodstream, largely unchecked.

    Cotler-Wunsh’s adoptive father, Irwin Cotler, is a renowned international human rights champion and Canada’s former justice minister. A tireless advocate for dissidents in Russia, Iran, China, and elsewhere, Cotler served as Canada’s special envoy on preserving Holocaust remembrance and combating antisemitism until just days after October 7.

    Last December, after he failed to show up at a Toronto event celebrating the imprisoned Hong Kong dissident Jimmy Lai, it was disclosed that Cotler was under 24-hour police protection because of a threat to his life. The assassination plot was hatched in Tehran.

    “Seeing that was heartbreaking,” Cotler-Wunsh told me. “The thought that this would happen in Canada, the thought that in this multicultural beacon of dignity for all, that Canada’s former justice minister, a human rights warrior who fought for hundreds of people around the world, is under house arrest—you could say, trapped in his own home—is really heartbreaking.”

    Heartbreaking is a word that well describes the way Canadian Jews see their predicament these days. “I have never seen in all my life such a thing, such expressions from people of all ages, such expressions of apprehension, of isolation, insecurity, foreboding, expressed in different ways,” said Cotler, 84, when we spoke last week. “I see it when I meet with students; I see it when I meet with elderly people. I hear, ‘This is not the Canada I know,’ or ‘This is not the Canada I came to.’ Or ‘This is not the Canada I have ever experienced. This is something else.’ And they are afraid to publicly express it.”

    In part, that’s because antisemitism is no longer just some protest culture eccentricity. It’s going mainstream, from the bottom to the top.

  • Janice Turner in the Times – Don’t allow puberty blockers to sneak back in:

    On Wednesday a reckless 13-year medical experiment was finally ended: no longer will troubled children, predominantly girls, be prescribed powerful drugs to stunt their developing bodies. Puberty blockers, which weaken bone density and arrest the evolving adolescent brain without any proven benefit to gender-confused children, are now banned.

    The health secretary, Wes Streeting, deserves credit both for his diligence in sealing loopholes, such as quack private clinics prescribing from Singapore over Zoom, but also his moral courage. Already activists have camped outside his constituency office with cardboard coffins and histrionic signs saying “Keep trans kids alive”. Announcing the ban in parliament, he was assailed by the Green MPs Sian Berry and Carla Denyer, plus Labour’s Stella Creasy, for whom a four-year review of global evidence by the eminent paediatrician Baroness Cass isn’t enough. Nor is the retreat from prescribing these drugs by health services across Scandinavia and in France. Nor the grotesque truth that a child who progresses from puberty blockers to cross-sex hormones — as 99 per cent of cases do — is frozen forever in a body both infertile and incapable of orgasm.

    Indeed, for activists no evidence will ever be enough. Their advocacy for puberty blockers isn’t based on medical benefits but emotions and irrational faith. These “progressives” still believe children — mainly future lesbians and gay men — are in the “wrong body”, which must be fixed by Big Pharma. Now they cry “discrimination” because the same GnRH (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone) drugs are used for other medical conditions. Which is like arguing if thalidomide is used against leprosy and blood cancers, it’s unfair pregnant women can’t take it for morning sickness.

    But Cass has, unfortunately, left a loophole.

    The terrible experiment has ended — almost. In her review, Dr Cass advocates banning puberty blockers except to participants in a clinical trial that will start recruiting in spring. Activists are seizing on this pledge as a back door to obtaining blockers. Denyer asked about the number of participants, and Streeting replied it was “not capped”. The National Institute for Health and Care Research is yet to decide the trial’s terms, and no wonder.

    Indeed. What's the point? And how on earth would such a trial be set up?

    Cass was in a bind. Having concluded that the quality of existing academic research was poor and short term — and perhaps to end all future disputes — she proposed a gold standard trial. But what proposition will it test? Blockers are not a treatment per se. They are the first part of a three-step process involving cross-sex hormones, then surgery. As one clinician notes: “It’s like evaluating the outcome of a knee operation just by studying the anaesthetic.”

    Many ethical questions remain. How can you create a control group when those children on placebos would quickly know, since their puberty would begin? How can you disentangle the benefits of psychotherapy — which Cass has promised all patients — from those of a drug? How do you factor in that most patients have co-morbidities such as anorexia, autism or trauma from homophobic bullying or sexual abuse? Will a cohort of children feel under pressure from activists to be positive about these campaigned-for drugs? A key justification for blockers, especially among late-transitioning males, is they allow trans people to “pass” more easily as the opposite sex. But how can such cosmetic advantages be weighed against loss of physical capacity to have children?

    Above all, how do you select child patients to test a drug when 85 per cent of dysphoria cases resolve themselves at puberty — but doctors can never predict which ones? And what if participants, whose bodies and lives are changed forever, have later regrets?

    Maybe, say some clinicians, it would be better to study the huge new trans patient cohort that emerged only a decade ago: teenage girls. Or if a long-term view is required, compel adult gender clinics to release data on about 9,000 children who graduated into their care. (Six out of seven clinics have refused.) Yet there is one reason the NHS is compelled to launch a trial. If such an experiment were deemed too risky, why the hell was it being conducted at Gids since 2011?

    It is time to throw puberty blockers into the pile of medical crazes, like lunchtime lobotomies and trepanning. End too the mad notion that demanding these terrible drugs is the metric of how much you care about gender-questioning young people. Are we really going to turn more children into lab rats because we haven’t yet convinced ideologues such as Creasy? Because the chances are no medical trial, no amount of scientific evidence, ever will.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • The Times, on Surrey council boss Joanna Killian:

    The leader of the county council responsible for providing social care to Sara Sharif was given a £234,000 salary months before she was murdered.

    Well, at least she died a wealthy woman.

  • Confusion in North Korea over this idea that, in South Korea, people can call, in public, for the resignation of their leader. How can such a thing be possible?

    Students at Haeju Teachers College in South Hwanghae province faced disciplinary action for questioning content from a lecture about South Korean politics, Daily NK has learned.

    “The college held a year-end lecture about South Korean public protests calling for President Yoon Suk-yeol’s resignation. Several students received warnings for privately discussing unfamiliar concepts from the lecture,” a source in the province told Daily NK on Wednesday.

    According to the source, students attended a lecture about South Korea’s political situation on Dec. 4. While the lecture focused on daily protests against the Yoon administration, students became particularly curious when the speaker mentioned falling presidential approval ratings.

    After the lecture, small groups of students gathered to discuss what approval ratings meant, how they were measured, and why anyone would be allowed to assess a leader’s popularity. One student reported these discussions to the college’s Socialist Patriotic Youth League chapter, which escalated the matter to the college’s party committee.

    The party committee viewed the students’ questions about leadership approval ratings as challenging their authority. Several students were summoned for questioning by the college’s state security agent.

    “The students explained to the security agent that they were simply curious about the South Korean president’s approval rating and had no ulterior motives. Nevertheless, they were ordered to write self-criticism statements to prevent rumors from spreading,” the source said.

    “In their statements, the students expressed regret for making inappropriate comments and promised to maintain proper conduct during future lectures,” the source added.

    Following the incident, the college has completely banned students from discussing politics.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    “To say that you can just self-define as a woman, for me, has no basis whatsoever in reality. When I call myself a ‘feminist,’ it is about equality. I believe women should be able to do the same things as men. It’s about having equal agency and equal power.”

    “One of the issues with feminism is that it became too academic and started going down rabbit holes, such as arguing that being a woman is merely a social construct. But no, it isn’t—it’s real, it’s biology. While there are stereotypes and social constructs, being a woman involves a shared experience that connects every woman on the planet.”

    “What drives me crazy is seeing how the lives of young, sometimes very young, gay or autistic children are being destroyed in the name of trans activism, which often conflicts with feminism. Many women who call themselves feminists, in my view, are on the wrong side. They don’t understand what they are fighting for.”

    “Meeting children and young people who have been effectively sterilized is horrific. How can people allow this to happen and justify it as just a matter of self-definition? I am very, very much against that.”

    Watch the entire conversation: thefp.pub/3BpillT

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    The language used by MPs protesting the necessary, sensible and welcome ban of puberty blockers for children caught up in transgender identity ideology:

    – Maggie Chapman talked of 'trans siblings'
    – Sian Berry 'trans youth'
    – Stella Creasy 'young trans men', and
    – Nadia Whittome 'young trans people'.

    It sounds a lot less palatable if you say you are against 'children' being prevented from taking drugs that will make them infertile, in circumstances where where there are grave doubts that consent can be meaningful and where there is an absence of proof that those drugs are safe or effective.

    Again: there are no trans youth. It's not a thing. No one is born in the wrong body. There are only victims of a social contagion who will in the majority of cases grow up to be gay. They should be left alone to go through puberty; not be the subject of irreversible medical experimentation with – as Cass showed – no demonstrable benefits.

  • George Galloway swims, as ever, in murky waters. At least – some consolation – he's not at all happy with the latest developments in Syria. “October 7 now looks like a very bad idea, and it makes you wonder whose idea it was anyway.” Hmm.

    From MEMRI TV:

    Iranian Professor Mohammad Marandi, who teaches English at Tehran University, told former British MP George Galloway in a December 8, 2024 interview following the collapse of the Bashar Al-Assad regime that “Netanyahu has succeeded in raising the black flag of ISIS and Al-Qaeda in Damascus.” He lamented that after “what Erdoğan has done” he can no longer say that Israel has been defeated. Galloway replied that in fact, the collapse of the Assad regime is an Israeli victory and echoing a post on X he had written earlier that day, he said: “October 7 now looks like a very bad idea, and it makes you wonder whose idea it was anyway.” Marandi discussed Iranian regional influence saying that while Erdoğan was not serious about the Palestinian cause and did not give Palestinians in Gaza or the West Bank a single bullet, Iran supplied weapons to the West Bank. He further said that Iran had sent troops and advisors to Damascus in order to ward off the opposition, but President Bashar Al-Assad and the Syrian army refused to fight them.

    Not necessarily an Israeli victory, but certainly an Iranian defeat. Poor George.

    Oh lord, that hat….