• From MEMRI TV:

    British-Palestinian academic Ghada Karmi praised Hamas during her speech at the Islamic Human Rights Council (IHRC) Genocide Memorial Day on January 19, 2025. She said that she would like to “pay tribute to Hamas,” which has been “completely demonized.” Karmi said that Israel cannot be accommodated or reformed, nor could it be made to join the human family, and therefore it must be dismantled. She added that it is necessary to work towards ridding the region and the world of Israel. Speakers at the event spoke into microphones of Iran state English-language Press TV and Iran Press news agency. The Islamic Human Rights Council is based in London, and it has been accused of having direct ties to Iran.

     Ghada Karmi at Wikipedia: 

    She has written on Palestinian issues in newspapers and magazines, including The Guardian, The Nation and Journal of Palestine Studies. […]

    Karmi is an associate fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, and a visiting professor at London Metropolitan University. She is also vice-chair of the Council for Arab-British Understanding (CAABU).

    She delivered the Edward Said Memorial lecture at the University of Adelaide, Australia in 2007.

    According to her website she's currently a Research Fellow at the Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, University of Exeter.

    Coming out with unhinged stuff about ridding the world of Israel, and lauding a genocidal antisemitic terrorist group, clearly does wonders for your academic career.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    Gender ideology has undermined freedom of speech, scientific truth, gay rights, and women's and girls' safety, privacy and dignity. It's also caused irreparable physical damage to vulnerable kids.

    Nobody voted for it, the vast majority of people disagree with it, yet it has been imposed, top down, by politicians, healthcare bodies, academia, sections of the media, celebrities and even the police. Its activists have threatened and enacted violence on those who've dared oppose it. People have been defamed and discriminated against for questioning it. Jobs have been lost and lives have been ruined, all for the crime of knowing that sex is real and matters.

    When the smoke clears, it will be only too evident that this was never about a so-called vulnerable minority, notwithstanding the fact that some very vulnerable people have been harmed. The power dynamics underpinning our society have been reinforced, not dismantled. The loudest voices throughout this entire fiasco have been people insulated from consequences by their wealth and/or status. They aren't likely to find themselves locked in a prison cell with a 6'4" rapist who's decided his name's now Dolores. They don't need state-funded rape crisis centres, nor do they ever frequent high street changing rooms. They simper from talk show sofas about those nasty far-right bigots who don't want penises swinging around the girls' showers, secure in the knowledge that their private pool remains the safe place it always was.

    Those who've benefited most from gender identity ideology are men, both trans-identified and not. Some have been rewarded for having a cross-dressing kink by access to all spaces previously reserved for women. Others have parlayed their delicious new victim status into an excuse to threaten, assault and harass women. Non-trans-identified leftybros have found a magnificent platform from which to display their own impeccably progressive credentials, by jeering and sneering at the needs of women and girls, all while patting themselves on the back for giving away rights that aren't theirs.

    The actual victims in this mess have been women and children, especially the most vulnerable, gay people who've resisted the movement and paid a horrible price, and regular people working in environments where one misplaced pronoun could see you vilified or constructively dismissed. Do not tell me this is about a tiny minority. This movement has impacted society in disastrous ways, and if you had any sense, you'd be quietly deleting every trace of activist mantras, ad hominem attacks, false equivalence and circular arguments from your X feeds, because the day is fast approaching when you'll want to pretend you always saw through the craziness and never believed it for a second.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Added:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • The paradox of the wars that Israel's fought over the last 75 years is that it could never really win. If the opposing Arab armies had won we know what would have happened: the Israelis – the Jews – would have been slaughtered and driven out, to much rejoicing across the Arab/Muslim world. But the Israelis couldn't capitalise on their victories. The world would have been horrified. They were, for Israel, wars of survival, and the aftermath, basically, has always been a return to the pre-war position. The Arabs never had to pay for their aggression, and no lessons have ever been learnt by them. They just start preparing for the next war – with the world, mainly in the shape of the UN, encouraging them along.

    Well, whatever else you can say, Trump's put a bomb under that. Lee Smith at Tablet:

    Yesterday, President Donald Trump single-handedly collapsed the most destructive idea of the last hundred years—Palestine. During meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials, Trump said he was going to move 1.7 million Palestinians out of Gaza. And just like that, he broke the long spell that had captured generations of world leaders, peace activists, and Middle East terror masters alike, who had paradoxically come to regard the repeated failure and haunting secondary consequences of the idea of joint Arab Muslim and Jewish statehood in the same small piece of land as proof of its necessity.

    Palestine was a misshapen idea from the beginning, engendered by an act of pure negation. The Arabs could have gone along with the U.N.’s partition plan like the Jews did, and chosen to build whatever version of Switzerland or Belgium on the eastern Med in 1948. Instead, they resoundingly chose war. That’s the storied “Nakba” at the core of the Palestinian legend—the catastrophe that drove the Arabs from their land and hung a key around the neck of a nation waiting to go home. The Arabs chose the catastrophe; they chose war, based on the premise that they would inevitably win and exterminate the Jews.

    Yet despite repeated military failures, and the increasing distance between the first-world powerhouse that the Israelis built and their increasingly war-torn, third-world neighborhood, the global conscience was always predisposed to rebuilding what the Palestinians destroyed. Accordingly, the Palestinian Arabs became a tribe of feral children whose identity was carved out of the relentless vow to eliminate Israel and slaughter the Jews en masse—despite repeated failures, each one more crushing than the last.

    Trump said, enough, we’re not rebuilding Gaza. Time for a new idea—the Gazans have to to go, they can try to start again somewhere else, in a land where every building still standing isn’t already wired to explode. […]

    Here is the stark reality: Gazans, not just the enlisted members of the Hamas brigades, waged an exterminationist campaign against Israel, and they lost. At virtually any other time in history, save the last 75 years, they would be lucky to lose only territory and not have their legend and language permanently deleted from the book of the living.

    Trump’s generous offer to the Gazans therefore signals a return to history, but with a twist. Trump has not only spared them, but vowed to provide them with new lives, better lives, work, new homes, a chance to raise their families in peace, an existence not premised on total and permanent war with a more powerful adversary destined to rout them entirely, and would have already done so if not for the objections of other powerful global players.

    Interesting times. This is a paradigm shift in thinking about Israel and Gaza – and only the US could make this suggestion. The old pre-Obama US, that is. Could it really happen? Could they make it work? I honestly don't think so, but….we'll see. It certainly has – as Trump loves to do – shaken things up.

  • Back up to Hampstead this morning:

    IMG_3327s

    IMG_3320s

    IMG_3323s

    IMG_3326s

    IMG_3329s

  • "…Galloway suggests that allegations of sexual harassment and assault are used to "silence dissidents". Never forget that less than a year ago this shameless opportunist was supported by the "daily paper of the British left" the Morning Star to win the Rochdale by-election and soon after was fawned over in a long interview with Novara Media's Aaron Bastani in which he admitted he did not support LGBT equality as gay people were "not normal" (Bastani, who only after the negative public reaction to Galloway's comments became clear issued a statement dissociating himself from the wannabee Trump, had merely demurred that a better description might be "not typical"). None of this should really be a shock given Galloway's record and politics. But he has clearly sniffed which way the wind is blowing, i.e to the populist, misogynistic and pseudo-religious far right, and like RFK Jnr he wants a slice of the action."

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Cynthia Nixon celebrated the life of liberated New York women in Sex and the City. She had her daughter's breasts surgically removed – so no chance of a repeat there.

    From her Wiki page: "In June 2018, Nixon revealed that her older child is transgender." That should be: "In June 2018, Nixon decided that her older child is transgender."

    [She also – what a surprise – "supports South Africa's genocide case against Israel. She contributed to a video series, published by the Palestine Festival of Literature, in support of South Africa's motion, accusing Israel of genocide against civilians in Gaza."]

    Added:

    Gi96LD0aoAAST-y

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    "This is the Islamic Republic of Iran, where women are imprisoned, beaten, and even killed simply for wanting a normal life."

  • Here we go. ‘It Shouldn’t Be Happening Here’ Parents of trans children in NYC are outraged as hospitals quietly shift their approach to gender-affirming care

    That stress has affected one mother in the Bronx whose son transitioned at the age of 3. He just turned 12, and his doctor at NYU Langone informed her that he will not be able to get a puberty-blocker device implanted in his arm this spring as planned. She was told the hospital is interpreting the order’s ban on “surgery” to include this quick outpatient procedure. While the medication-delivery device lasts a year, the alternative is quarterly injections, which would mean a two-hour commute by train every three months. Plus, her son is afraid of needles. “I haven’t even told him yet because things feel so in flux, and we’re hoping they can be ashamed or shocked or forced by law into giving the care they need to give,” she says. “This is a civil rights issue.”

    Transitioned at the age of 3.

    J.D., who is the trans dad of a 15-year-old trans daughter, tells me he stockpiled a year’s worth of meds for her after the election and has shared information with other families on how to do the same. “It’s a life-and-death issue,” he says. “There’s nothing more important in her life than having this care. We’ve known she was trans since she was 2 and a half.” The mood in their home has been brutal since the election. “We are an all-queer family. I’m a trans person myself,” he adds. “I’m very angry and I have a lot of despair.”

    Trans since the age of 2 and a half.

    These people are in the grip of a cult. It's like waiting for the aliens to arrive. It's Jonestown on the Hudson.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    The paper is here. The abstract:

    The Cass Review’s final report, published in April 2024, made recommendations to the UK’s National Health Service regarding structuring of services for minors with gender-related distress. It recommended cautious use of hormonal interventions in this population and use of research protocols. Some clinician-researchers disagree with the Cass Review’s recommendations and have written critiques. A critique of the Cass Review posted on Yale Law School’s website in July 2024 has received extensive media coverage. Its references identified three other critiques. In these papers, there were multiple claims that were incorrect or that lacked essential clarification/contextualization. These claims involved (1) the Cass Review’s contents and processes; (2) the pediatric transgender healthcare evidence base; (3) existing clinical practice guidelines, including claims that there is international medical consensus; (4) evidence-based medical practice and guideline development; and (5) conclusions regarding the validity of the Cass Review’s findings. The Cass Review’s careful, balanced investigations and judgments were a comprehensive, evidence-based response to the controversies in this pediatric clinical arena. Recently-published critiques of the Review have contained incorrect or inadequately contextualized claims. Because accurate information about medical interventions is essential to informed consent, it is important to correct errors in potentially influential publications.