• Meanwhile, in Norwich:

    A Green councillor has been accused of calling a group of women holding a silent vigil for Afghan women and children "Nazis".

    Charlie Caine, a member of Norwich City Council, is said to have launched the verbal attack on the event outside the Forum.

    The vigil was organised by the Norwich Women's Rights Group and Women's Rights Network (WRN) Norfolk, which have previously raised concerns about the impact of gender ideology on women and girls.

    The councillor, who is a transman – the term for someone born female but who identifies as a man – is accused of shouting at the gathering, calling those assembled "Nazis" and "transphobes"….

    Sarah Walker, a member of the group, said: “As soon as I announced our vigil we were approached by Green Party city councillor for Mile Cross, Charlie Caine, who stood on the library steps above us and screamed abuse, yelling as loud as possible that we were 'transphobes' and 'Nazis' and looking around at passersby as if trying to rouse them to join in abusing and harassing us. It was quite extraordinary.”

    Liz Wills, a WRN co-ordinator, said “It’s worth stressing that this situation had nothing to do with trans issues.

    "The women who turned up, including the Muslim women, were there solely to support Afghan women who are actually the most oppressed group in the world.

    "This cannot be dismissed as a battle of rights, it was abuse, harassment and public disorder.”

    Somehow it's always the Greens.

  • Further to that Kevin McKenna extract from The Herald on "why corporate power and public sector influence has swung behind the campaign for trans rights", here's James Marriott in the Times this morning, looking at the same phenomenon with a broader lens:

    International capitalism’s flirtation with the politics of the student union was always an unlikely one. The affair — passionate, confused, rather mad — had more of the air of an imprudent fling than of a serious commitment. Clumsy gestures at radical chic by Amazon, General Motors and McDonald’s — who could have predicted a ruthlessly profit-seeking fast food enterprise would end up fostering “healing spaces for Black individuals”? — would have delighted and astounded even the term’s cynical inventor, Tom Wolfe. He would also not have been surprised to learn they are now backing away from those ideas.

    With hindsight, the phenomenon of “woke capitalism” is becoming more explicable. Anybody who has ever worked for a large company knows that strange notions and ill-conceived “initiatives” blow through such institutions like rotten autumn leaves through a ruined cottage. Sheer novelty is often a recommendation in itself. Though many executives were doubtless sincere, I suspect that for some of those now eschewing DEI, the term didn’t represent much more than another attractive buzzword in a corporate culture addicted to buzzwords. The upside to not really caring about ideas is that it is relatively easy to slough off the bad ones when you have tired of them.

    Nobody at McDonald’s (with the possible exception of a penurious burger-flipping PhD student somewhere) is a committed scholar of Judith Butler. But in some sectors, most notably academia and the arts, these ideas are entrenched and sincerely held….

    Friends working in universities report an atmosphere in which it is for ever the summer of 2021 — an eerily preserved Miss Havisham’s house of mouldering ideologies and stale doctrine. Many mediocrities have built careers on simplistic political interpretations of art and lack the talent to think any other way. They shore up their own positions by hiring like-minded people. Meanwhile, many of the “grown-ups” who protected the art galleries and the English departments in their care are drifting off into retirement.

    In many places, the revolution has been institutionalised. Curriculums have been reformed. Books have been reprinted without their offensive passages. A couple of years ago, Tate Britain rehung its entire permanent collection to reflect fashionable sensitivities. Disapproving reminders that the subjects of paintings by George Romney and Thomas Gainsborough “participated in the trade of enslaved people” or “amassed [wealth] through Atlantic trade and plantations” are now part of the permanent story this country tells about its artistic heritage.

    In the National Portrait Gallery (also rehung at the height of the woke moment), Samuel Pepys stands condemned to posterity as a sex abuser by the label fixed next to his picture. I sometimes wonder if I will live to see the curator intelligent enough to replace it with one explaining that his diary is one of the all-time wonders of human introspection and that Pepys’s extramarital excursions are not even the 100th most interesting thing in it. One strand of opinion holds that these organisations have the power to stamp their values on society permanently. But it is worth countenancing another future, in which those institutions still clinging to the fashionable ideas of the 2020s exile themselves from the mainstream and doom themselves to irrelevance as the rest of society simply moves on.

    The big beasts of capitalism are already moving on. Bud Light, for instance, is focusing on blokey good humour now in their latest Superbowl ad, trying to put the Dylan Mulvaney disaster behind them. Universities and cultural institutions, on the other hand, are going to take a lot longer. The people there actually believe this stuff: often enough it's how they got their jobs in the first place. Sometimes a touch of cynicism can be a good thing.

  • Baroness Nicolson provides a perfect coda to the Science Museum heteronormative Lego saga:

    Screenshot 2025-02-11 095946

  • I don't have full access to The Herald Scotland, but I like the start of Kevin McKenna's article on the Sandie Peggie case – NHS trans tribunal is about much more than a nurse's fight for her job:

    What better way to side-track the liberal left from their main goal of relieving poverty and opposing capitalism than by promoting an imaginary dogma of oppression? There’s a reason why corporate power and public sector influence has swung behind the campaign for trans rights. If you can convince sincere and well-motivated people that this is the moral crusade that defines the age then you can be left relatively undisturbed to amass your profits.

    And what better way of doing this than by conjuring up an ethereal and contrived suite of slogans and declarations: trans rights are human rights; love is love?

    The case of Sandie Peggie against NHS Fife is one of those cut-through moments when the general public have been afforded a glimpse behind the veil that’s been carefully drawn over the trans debate by Scotland’s political class.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    For more on the Farhud, see here.

  • From MEMRI TV:

    In a Friday sermon delivered in the Gaza Strip, during the February 7, 2025 funeral of Hamas military commander Marwan Issa, who was reportedly killed in March 2024, the imam addressed the crowd and told them: "You […] love martyrdom for the sake of Allah. You love to kill for the sake of Allah." He added that the resistance fighters could not have waged Jihad and massacred the Jews, had it not been for the "grace of Allah." He quoted a verse from the Quran stating: "You did not kill them it was Allah who killed them."

    Regarding Trump's plan to relocate Gaza residents, the imam said that either they return to their land within the 1948 borders, referring to Ashkelon, Ashdod, Ramla, Haifa, and Jerusalem, or they will be martyred. He pledged to continue on the path of Jihad and resistance until the liberation of Palestine. The sermon was delivered during a ceasefire between Hamas and Gaza and aired by Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas).

    "The [Islamic] nation has been plagued with a disease, of love for the material world and a hatred of death. You however love martyrdom for the sake of Allah. You love to kill for the sake of Allah.

    "By Allah, the resistance fighters could not fight, and could not massacre the Jews, if it had not been for the grace of Allah."

    He's not wrong. Yes, it's all for the sake of Allah. It's all about Islam.

  • A Times report:

    An Albanian criminal avoided deportation from Britain because his ten-year-old son did not like the taste of chicken nuggets served in other countries, court documents show.

    An immigration tribunal ruled that it would be “unduly harsh” for Klevis Disha, 39, to be sent back to Albania partly because his son “will not eat the type of chicken nuggets that are available abroad”.

    Disha entered the UK illegally in 2001, when he was 15, falsely stating that he was born in the former Yugoslavia. His asylum claim was rejected but he was granted citizenship in 2007.

    He met his partner, an Albanian naturalised British citizen, in 2006 and the couple had two children.

    In September 2017 Disha was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment after being found in possession of more than £250,000 in cash, known to be the proceeds of crime.

    In 2019, when she was home secretary, Priti Patel ordered that he be deported and stripped of his UK citizenship because it had been “acquired through deception”.

    But then…chicken nuggets to the rescue. He was saved!

    Added. From the Telegraph:

    A Pakistani father who was jailed for child sex offences escaped deportation because it would be “unduly harsh” on his children.

    The unnamed father of two toddlers, who was granted anonymity by an immigration court, had been banned from living with his children since he was convicted of trying to get three “barely pubescent” girls to engage in sex and jailed for 18 months.

    However, a lower tribunal judge ruled that he should not be deported back to Pakistan as it would be “unduly harsh for the children to be without their father”.

    The Home Office appealed the decision and was backed by an upper tribunal judge Judith Gleeson who set aside the ruling, criticising it as “contrary to the evidence, plainly wrong and rationally insupportable”. 

    The case is ongoing.

  • From the Daily NK:

    North Korea is conducting lectures for state security agents to reinforce the country’s nuclear status and sharpen surveillance for signs of ideological dissent among a public increasingly strained by economic hardship.

    According to a source in South Hamgyong province, the provincial state security bureau held a lecture on Feb. 1 during its regular Saturday study session. The presentation highlighted North Korea’s independent acquisition of nuclear weapons and how nuclear development initiatives begun under Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il have supposedly strengthened national defense and economic growth.

    The lecture emphasized state security agents’ crucial role in monitoring the population, stressing the need for constant vigilance regarding public sentiment. This aligns with the regime’s long-standing strategy of justifying nuclear weapons as essential for national survival while promoting unity and suppressing ideological dissent. The approach includes restricting access to outside information and actively promoting the party’s nuclear policy as part of a decades-old system of social control.

    “The lecture served two purposes: reinforcing the legitimacy of nuclear weapons to state security agents while motivating them to identify and eliminate any signs of ideological discontent that could threaten regime stability,” the source explained. However, they added, “State security agents alone can’t prevent public dissatisfaction. As living conditions worsen, many people question the value of maintaining nuclear weapons.”

    As Christopher Hitchens reminded us, you may try to avoid the old cliches with regard to North Korea – 1984, Orwellian – but in the end they make you do it. 
  • A useful summary of the Sandie Peggie NHS Fife case at The Critic, from Michael Foran. In conclusion:

    The law on workplace changing rooms is clear: the Workplace (Health, Safety, and Welfare) Regulation 1992 which state that changing facilities will not be suitable “unless they include separate facilities for, or separate use of facilities by, men and women where necessary for reasons of propriety”. Given the fact that in a hospital staff must change completely into scrubs, it is obvious that these Regulations envisage separate facilities for men and women being necessary for reasons of propriety.

    It is not possible for Dr Upton to have met the requirements for obtaining a GRC because, as stated in oral evidence this week, Upton began transitioning in 2022 and therefore could not have completed the required 2 years of living in the acquired gender prior to August 2023 when the events in this case began. Therefore, as a matter of UK law, Dr Upton is a man for all legal purposes, including the Equality Act 2010 and the 1992 Regulations. 

    The 1992 Regulations are strict. There is no flex in them. NHS Fife is under an obligation to provide separate male and female changing facilities for staff. Providing a changing facility labelled “female only” while engaging in a practice of allowing a man to use it is not providing separate male and female changing facilities. 

     This is clear as a matter of law. What remains to be determined is whether the failure to provide a female-only changing room and the use of purportedly female-only facilities by Dr Upton constitute unlawful harassment and discrimination against Ms Peggie. I’ve written elsewhere about those legal questions, for those who are interested.

  • That didn't take long (via):

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js