• Bret Stephens in the NYT:

    If Roosevelt had told Churchill to sue for peace on any terms with Adolf Hitler and to fork over Britain’s coal reserves to the United States in exchange for no American security guarantees, it might have approximated what Trump did to Zelensky. Whatever one might say about how Zelensky played his cards poorly — either by failing to behave with the degree of all-fours sycophancy that Trump demands or to maintain his composure in the face of JD Vance’s disingenuous provocations — this was a day of American infamy.

     

  • April 12, 1912. Atlanta, Georgia. "Southern Iron & Equipment Co. — Locomotive SIECO 807. (West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company Locomotive 1; Dobbins, West Virginia. Climax Loco #534, 1904)."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Marre Rail Transportation Photo Collection]

  • Yes, we know how this goes. The winner, of course, is a man. 

    This year’s Sydney Local Woman of the Year has been announced, with MP Alex Greenwich presenting the award on Wednesday afternoon.

    T Brianna Skinner has been working with Greenwich for more than a decade, first meeting with him in 2014 to discuss concerns about people in NSW being unable to change their gender on identification documents such as birth and marriage certificates.

    “Brianna’s own experience of transitioning from male to female highlighted to her the discrimination and bureaucratic discrepancies that outdated NSW laws imposed on Trans and gender diverse people,” said Greenwich….

    Chosen by members of parliament, The Local Woman of the Year Awards is an annual NSW Government award that gives parliamentarians the opportunity to recognise and celebrate the contributions of local women.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    During our talks, we discussed the challenges facing Ukraine and all of Europe, coordination with partners, concrete steps to strengthen Ukraine’s position, and ending the war with a just peace, along with robust security guarantees.

    A principled statement of support from the Prime Minister and an important decision: today, in our presence, Ukraine and the United Kingdom signed a Loan Agreement. This loan will enhance Ukraine’s defense capabilities and will be repaid using revenues from frozen Russian assets. The funds will be directed toward weapons production in Ukraine. This is true justice – the one who started the war must be the one to pay.

    I thank the people and government of the United Kingdom for their tremendous support from the very beginning of this war. We are happy to have such strategic partners and to share the same vision of what a secure future should look like for all.

  • For many of us, our images of Russia's brutal destruction of Ukraine are centered on the port of Mariupol, after the 20 Days in Mariupol documentary film, and the BBC's Mariupol: The People's Story.

    Now, from the Times – Museum celebrating Stalin’s culture chief opened in Mariupol:

    At the height of his powers after the Second World War, Stalin’s culture chief, Andrei Zhdanov, demanded that writers, artists and musicians show slavish obedience to Communist dogma.

    A ruthless party boss who had personally approved 175 execution lists during Stalin’s Great Purge in the 1930s, he denounced Anna Akhmatova — one of Russia’s finest poets — as “half-nun, half harlot” and ostracised Ukrainian writers judged to have been too nationalistic.

    After his death in 1948, Mariupol in southern Ukraine, Zhdanov’s home city, was renamed in his honour. It did not change back until 1989, when the Soviet Union began to disintegrate and popular feeling turned against Stalin’s henchmen.

    Now, as Vladimir Putin revives some of the sentiments of Zhdanov’s time in modern Russia, a new museum to him has been opened in Mariupol, a city that was pulverised by bombing in the early part of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine before being occupied by Russian forces in May 2022.

    The museum, created to lionise Zhdanov, has caused anger and disquiet among many Ukrainians.

    I imagine anger and disquiet are the least of it. Outrage and horror, more like.

    Andrey Kurkov, one of the country’s most celebrated contemporary novelists, said in a telephone interview from Kyiv that the decision to open the museum was “ridiculous and disgusting”.

    Zhdanov was a ruthless “destroyer of any freedom” who persecuted the arts and was “ready to sacrifice any number of people” to save his own skin during the purges, said Kurkov.

    “This museum is a warning from Moscow to Donbas [eastern Ukraine] that there is no going back and they should remember Soviet history and what happens to those who disagree with state policy,” he added. “And I’m sure all the children of the region will be taken there and brainwashed even more … Russia is marking its territory.”

    Russian and pro-Moscow local officials said Zhdanov was being honoured because of his key role in the defence of Leningrad during the siege there from 1941 to 1944.

    “The people of Mariupol also endured the hardships of terrifying days under blockade,” Oleg Morgun, the Russia-installed mayor of Mariupol, told reporters at the opening of the museum. “These memories will remain for ever in the hearts of our people. In liberated Mariupol, we honour and remember the true history of our country.”

    In liberated Mariupol! "Liberated" by the bombing and killing and destruction done by Zhdanov's heirs.

    To Kyiv this looks like Orwellian doublespeak because it was Russian forces that encircled and attacked Mariupol in 2022. The UN concluded that up to 90 per cent of residential buildings were damaged or destroyed and 350,000 people forced to leave the city.

    An estimated 8,000 people died as a result of the siege, hundreds in a single incident when a Russian airstrike hit a theatre where civilians were sheltering. They had written “children” in huge letters in Russian on the ground outside….

    Russian liberals are also angry about his rehabilitation. Nina Popova, a former director of the Anna Akhmatova museum in St Petersburg, called Zhdanov’s return “a violation of the moral norms of society” and “revenge” for his erasure during the 1980s.

    “Zhdanov is being raised on a shield,” wrote the columnist Andrei Kolesnikov. “And not just anywhere but in Mariupol, a city whose fate is tragic whichever side of the trenches you’re on. They want to underline that tragedy by re-mythologising a Stalinist hangman. Why such cynicism?”

    Because Putin. And now, because Trump.

  • I'm astonished at the number of articles (the Spectator, notably) that criticise Zelensky for yesterday's debacle in the White House – he should have simpered and fawned before Trump apparently, because that's what Trump likes. But Zelensky's only mistake was in believing that he was dealing with serious adult politicians rather than the crude, schoolboy, jeering Trump cabal.

    Tom Nichols in the Atlantic on "one of the grimmest days in the history of American diplomacy":

    Leave aside, if only for a moment, the utter boorishness with which President Donald Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance treated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House today. Also leave aside the spectacle of American leaders publicly pummeling a friend as if he were an enemy. All of the ghastliness inflicted on Zelensky today should not obscure the geopolitical reality of what just happened: The president of the United States ambushed a loyal ally, presumably so that he can soon make a deal with the dictator of Russia to sell out a European nation fighting for its very existence.

    Trump’s advisers have already declared the meeting a win for “putting America first,” and his apologists will likely spin and rationalize this shameful moment as just a heated conversation—the kind of thing that in Washington-speak used to be called a “frank and candid exchange.” But this meeting reeked of a planned attack, with Trump unloading Russian talking points on Zelensky (such as blaming Ukraine for risking global war), all of it designed to humiliate the Ukrainian leader on national television and give Trump the pretext to do what he has indicated repeatedly he wants to do: side with Russian President Vladimir Putin and bring the war to an end on Russia’s terms….

    Vance’s presence at the White House also suggests that the meeting was a setup. Vance is usually an invisible backbencher in this administration, with few duties other than some occasional trolling of Trump’s critics. (The actual business of furthering Trump’s policies is apparently now Elon Musk’s job.) This time, however, he was brought in to troll not other Americans, but a foreign leader. 

    Vance was the bully's sidekick, cheering on the humiliation and making sure he got in a few jabs himself to please the boss. A vile display.

    Today’s meeting and America’s shameful vote in the United Nations on Monday confirmed that the United States is now aligned with Russia and against Ukraine, Europe, and most of the planet. I felt physically sick watching the president of the United States yell at a brave ally, fulminating in the Oval Office as if he were an addled old man shaking his fist at a television. Zelensky has endured tragedies, and risked his life, in ways that men such as Trump and Vance cannot imagine. (Vance served as a public-relations officer in the most powerful military in the world; he has never had to huddle in a bunker during a Russian bombardment.) I am ashamed for my nation; even if Congress acts to support and aid Ukraine, it cannot restore the American honor lost today.

    But no matter how disgusted anyone might be at Trump and Vance’s behavior, the strategic reality is that this meeting is a catastrophe for the United States and the free world. America’s alliances are now in danger, and should be: Trump is openly, and gleefully, betraying everything America has tried to defend since the defeat of the Axis 80 years ago. The entire international order of peace and security is now in danger, as Russian autocrats, after slaughtering innocent people for three years, look forward to enjoying the spoils of their invasion instead of standing trial for their crimes. (Shortly after Trump dismissed Zelensky from the White House, Putin’s homunculus, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, posted on X: “The insolent pig finally got a proper slap down in the Oval Office.”)

  • An excellent editorial in the Times this morning – NHS puberty blockers trial would turn children into guinea pigs:

    The mistreatment of children at the Tavistock’s gender identity clinic ranks as one of the gravest medical scandals in recent history. By the time the NHS-run service was permanently closed last March, it had become a matter of routine for its clinicians to prescribe trans-identified children with drugs that arrested the onset of puberty. Though misleadingly presented as a consequence-free intervention, in reality the majority of the thousands of children given puberty blockers advanced to cross-sex hormones, and some to brutalising and medically-unnecessary surgeries.

    What makes the scandal at the Tavistock all the more shocking is that its excesses were no accident: they were the predictable result of implementing the mistaken ideology that some children are born into the wrong sex. Taking this pernicious but fashionable belief at face value led doctors to abandon an array of professional norms and standards of good practice with alarming zeal.

    As Dr Hilary Cass’s landmark 2024 report into the NHS’s gender services concluded, the rationale for the use of puberty blockers on children remains “unclear”, with only “remarkably weak evidence” available as to their long-term effects. Yet perversely, Dr Cass’s accurate highlighting of the scant evidence base for the experimental treatments used at the Tavistock is now poised to set in train a process that is all but certain to see more children harmed. On Friday the NHS announced plans to launch a £10.7 million clinical trial looking into the drugs’ effects, with trans-identified children once again to be used as the human guinea pigs. This study cannot be allowed to proceed….

    Originally developed to treat prostate cancer, and occasionally used in the chemical castration of male sex offenders, puberty blockers act on the pituitary gland to shut off the natural production of sex hormones. They have never been licensed for use by children suffering feelings of cross-sex identification, but little in the way of medical expertise is needed to imagine their potential harms.

    Puberty is not an optional extra in a healthy human being’s biological life plan. It is a extended physiological process involving a range of fundamental cognitive and psychological changes. Suppressing it is a disaster for the individual concerned. The notion that an ethical trial should be undertaken to establish the possible downsides of chemically sterilising children is as macabre as it is irrational. That research could be conducted over a long enough time-scale to establish informative results, while remaining experimentally well-controlled, is just as dubious.

    Recent data from GP records suggests the number of children diagnosed with gender dysphoria has increased 50-fold over ten years. That trend, however, bears all the hallmarks of a social contagion, one aided and abetted by social media. Confronting such developments, adults, not least doctors, have a responsibility to prevent, rather than collude in, the mistaken choices children are liable to make about their own best interest.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • New York ca. 1907. "Plaza Hotel from Fifth Avenue at W. 58th Street."

    image from www.shorpy.com
    [Photo: Shorpy/Detroit Publishing Company]

    Just completed – A hotel of the same name was built from 1883 to 1890. The original hotel was replaced by the current structure from 1905 to 1907.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Story here:

    A group of pro-Palestine students interrupted a talk hosted by the King’s Geopolitics Forum (KGF) at King’s College London (KCL) yesterday in protest of an Iranian speaker who, they claim, “promoted Zionist behaviour”.

    The speaker, Iranian activist Faezeh Alavi, wrote on X before the event that a conversation about “Iran’s situation, people’s views on Israel & their vision for the region’s future” represented “an opportunity to reverse the course of history in Iran & the Middle East”.

    Scheduled to start at 6 pm at the Nash Lecture Theatre, the talk with the title “From Conflict to Connection: Israelis and Iranians in Dialogue” was attended by some 40 people. Among them, there were about a dozen pro-Palestine protesters.

    Twenty-five minutes into the event, one heckler stood up to question Alavi: “There has been a genocide happening for 15 months. How are you not going to talk about that?”

    To question? She was heckling like a deranged idiot, stopping Alavi from speaking. She had no interest – as ever with the pro-Palestine crowd – in debate. Just shouting and chanting.

    Security was called to the venue and Alavi exited the room….

    After Alavi left, the pro-Palestine protestors started shouting “Shame!” and “Free Palestine,” causing all attendees to leave the venue mid-event….

    Alavi has also voiced her support for Israel on X in the past.

    She told Roar:

    “I hope what happened at the event makes one thing clear: there are extremists who are silencing the voices of Muslims and do not want to see a prosperous Middle East. They once came after the Iranian nation in 1979, and now they are coming after Israel.”

    The topics to be discussed at the event included the difficulty of living within the Islamic Republic of Iran, the treatment of women there, the line between safety and freedom of expression, and Iranians’ view of Israel.

    The Pahlavi era flag with a Lion and Sun emblem, mentioned by Alavi, was replaced by an Islamic emblem with the Takbir written across the flag after the Revolution of 1979.

    In their statement, KGF wrote: “In an event that is supposed to foster unity and conversation between two opposing sides – Israel and Iran – the instigators have shown their true colours through an aggressive form of silencing.”

    Alavi recognised a bigger threat. She said: “Unfortunately, this destructive ideology has already reached the UK. I am frequently attacked by these people even here. This should alert the West to how dangerous it could become.”

    How dangerous it already has become. The flag reference makes it clear: this was an Islamist silencing of debate. Which worked. In a UK university.