• There's a notable silence on the grooming gangs scandal from Britain's muslims – and this is, despite the endless prattle about ethnicity, a story about Islamic culture. [In fact the concentration on ethnicity has perhaps made it easier for the whole business to be dismissed, as has happened so often, as a racist right-wing scare story.] These predatory men who form the overwhelming majority of the offenders don't just happen to be ethnically Pakistani: they are, more significantly, muslim. There's a straight line from the niqab, and the requirement for muslim women to cover themselves in public, to the horror stories coming from Rotherham and Rochdale and Bradford. In Islamic culture it's a woman's responsibility to guard against their sexual exploitation: men can't be expected to restrain themselves when confronted with displays of naked female flesh. These young white girls are asking for it.

    Islamic culture, from the Taliban to Iran to Saudi Arabia, is drenched in misogyny. I have no view on whether it's built in to the religion or it's something that's happened over the centuries – but there it is, an undeniable fact. The hope, largely unexpressed, was that over time British muslims would adapt to the mainstream culture, but progress is slow. It'd be interesting perhaps to see how many of the offenders are first or second or third generation immigrants, but matters aren't helped by the tendency of muslim communities to isolate themselves from mainstream UK culture – nor by the preference for cousin marriages.

    But yes, there's not much condemnation of the rape gangs, that I've heard, from muslim leaders. So this is at least a start, from Fiyaz Mughal, of Faith Matters and Tell MAMA, in the Telegraph:

    We can’t get away, nor can anyone miss, the glaringly obvious point that Casey repeatedly mentions in her report: that there is an over-representation of Asian men of Pakistani heritage amongst the men who abused and raped vulnerable white girls.

    This didn’t come out of a vacuum. Sermons in British mosques around child safeguarding, the promotion of equality for women and girls, and the need to tackle misogyny could possibly have changed things if they existed some two decades ago. Yet, even to this day, these matters are not discussed by many imams and religious leaders in the UK.

    Having worked for over two decades in British Muslim communities, I am aware of the problem of misogyny within them. Many Muslim women are trying to challenge patriarchy but are constantly lectured on their dress sense through the association of piety with “covering up”. The responsibility in Islam, (and I speak as a Muslim), seems to lie wholly on the shoulders of women around their bodies. This needs to change; there are many historical instances in Islamic history of women leaders who have challenged men.

    This is important because mosques have a key role in shaping and changing the behaviours of many Muslim men in the thirty five to sixty age bracket, where many of the child offenders sit within. After Casey’s report, there is an added impetus for imams and mosque committees to make child safeguarding and women’s rights front and centre in their sermons. For too long I have heard them talk about foreign affairs or discuss issues of no real relevance to the lives of Muslim men and women in Britain. Casey’s report is a stark wake up call for things to change.

    Muslim leaders need to stand with the women who had their lives shattered when they were girls by Asian men of Pakistani heritage. These men lived split lives, some acting as if they were holier than holy, yet their actions demonstrated that they were monsters who could not spare an ounce of empathy for vulnerable children. Such actions happen because religious, political and social leadership in British Muslim communities have failed to speak up to protect the weakest in our society.

    It's not earth-shattering, but it's a rare and welcome acknowledgement of the problem from a British muslim. 

  • Coming soon. From the Daily NK:

    North Korean authorities have ordered intensified anti-American and anti-South Korean propaganda activities during the “anti-U.S. joint struggle month” from June 25 to July 27, with special focus on indoctrinating young people.

    According to a Daily NK source in Pyongyang recently, the ruling party’s propaganda and agitation department convened a meeting for central government and provincial party officials above department chief rank early this month. The meeting emphasized that anti-U.S. and anti-South Korean ideology would be the centerpiece of this year’s campaign, with officials instructed to focus particularly on reaching youth.

    The department warned that the “revolution cannot survive if generations that haven’t experienced war become consumed by individual selfishness.” Officials were instructed to “awaken youth class consciousness by repeatedly emphasizing the atrocities committed by U.S. imperialists and puppet forces during the Korean War.”

    The campaign calls for maximizing anti-American and anti-South Korean sentiment through shocking imagery—depicting U.S. tanks crushing elderly people, women and children during the Korean War, or American troops burying and burning people alive.

    Officials were directed to organize visits to propaganda centers and field trips to cultural facilities displaying anti-American artwork.

    Perhaps with South Korea’s recent presidential transition in mind, the meeting reaffirmed North Korea’s policy of completely ignoring the South under the party’s “two hostile states” doctrine.

    “The propaganda and agitation department made clear that regardless of which government holds power in South Korea, it remains fundamentally a hostile force, and our party will maintain its strategy of ignoring South Korea indefinitely,” the source explained. “Officials said political changes in South Korea after the election provide no reason to alter this policy.”

    Perhaps that'll go some way to deter South Korea's recently elected left-wing president Lee Jae-myung, who has a starry-eyed vision of reconcilation with the North.

    Will South Korean President Lee Jae-myung Bring Peace to the Korean Peninsula? File under "questions to which the answer is no".

    The South seems to alternate between right-wing North Korean haters, like Moon the disgraced former president, and cosy left-wing reconciliationists like Lee. It makes absolutely no difference to the North. 

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • Melanie Phillips in the Times:

    Many have never understood that the past 20 months of events in Gaza, since the atrocities of October 7, 2023, are part of a multi-front war of extermination waged against Israel by Iran through its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and the West Bank.

    Israelis believe they must totally defeat Hamas as a military force to prevent it from repeating October 7-style atrocities. But they are also agonised over the fate of the hostages, whom Hamas won’t release unless Israel surrenders and whose continued incarceration has gravely hampered IDF operations.

    With Iran, by contrast, the issue is straightforward. Emerging from the rubble of their apartments after the missile strikes, already traumatised Israelis say: “We have no choice but to continue with this war if we are not to be annihilated by a nuclear Iran.”

    Israel attacked Iran because it believed the point of no return had been reached. The International Atomic Energy Agency said last week that Iran had enough enriched uranium to make nine nuclear bombs and was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.

    After Israel decapitated Hezbollah last year, and with Hamas in Gaza now severely degraded, Iran was staring at the destruction of its “ring of fire” proxy war strategy to exterminate Israel. Nuclear weapons were its last, most devastating resort. So it sped up its attempt to build them.

    Very recently, Israeli intelligence learnt that Tehran had been secretly working on weaponising nuclear material into an explosive device, bringing it weeks away from being able to produce a bomb. It also aimed to build 300 ballistic missiles a month. Both of these posed an immediate existential threat that Israel had to counter. The reason for this crisis was that the West, led by previous US and UK administrations, failed to acknowledge the irreconcilable religious fanaticism of the Tehran regime and believed it was amenable to compromise. The resulting US-brokered 2015 agreement could have enabled Iran to get the bomb with only a few years’ delay.

    Not that Israel is now getting any support from the UK.

    At the weekend Lord Hammond, the former Conservative foreign secretary who helped negotiate that agreement, said that “the Israelis are standing in the way of a new deal” with Iran. Was Hammond seriously suggesting that destroying Iran’s capacity to produce nuclear weapons was “standing in the way” of another deal with people who never even granted access to verify they were fulfilling their promises?

    This was on a par in its fatuousness with Sir Keir Starmer’s prim call for “de-escalation” between Israel and Iran. “De-escalating” the attempt to stop the Iranian bomb means allowing Iran to get the bomb. Both the Hammond and Starmer statements are based on the imbecilic western belief that religious fanatics negotiate in good faith and are governed by rational self-interest.

    Many in Israel — as in America — have written Britain off as having hopelessly lost the plot under the double whammy of radical, anti-western Islamists and left-wing, anti-western and post-truth ideologies. Israelis perceive to their stupefaction that Israel, the victim of genocidal attack and having gone to greater lengths than any other military to minimise civilian casualties in war, has been demonised in Britain as the aggressor and wanton killer of children. Israel is targeting Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure while Iran is targeting Israeli civilians — a war crime. Yet the usual suspects are accusing Israel of aggression and engaging in “tit for tat” attacks.

    If Israel now smashes the Iran-based Shia axis, this will reshape the Middle East for the better and remove an unconscionable threat not just to Israel but to the West too. “When you chant ‘Death to America!’ it is not just a slogan — it is a policy,” said Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in 2023. In Britain, the security service has warned of an “extraordinary threat” of Iranian terrorist attacks.

    Israel is doing the West a huge service — for which the Jewish state is paying in blood — that much of the West still obdurately refuses to realise.

  • Jonathan Spyer in the Spectator:

    As Israel advances its surgical reduction of Iran’s nuclear facilities and senior command, and Iran continues to launch missiles randomly at Israeli population centres in response, it is interesting to note what is not happening. Notably absent is any ground element to the war, which is currently being fought entirely between air and missile forces.

    This brings home just how much the picture has changed in Israel’s favour over the last 20 months. It also reveals the deeper logic of this war. On 6 October, the Iran-led regional alliance stood as the most powerful strategic axis in the Middle East, pursuing clear goals via proven modes of action. As a result of an ill-fated decision by one of its most minor members (Hamas) to launch a war it could not win, the regional components of this alliance were neutralised. Israel is now seeking to complete the job by pulverising Iran itself. An optimal result would be the fall of the regime. But a battered, isolated Tehran, stripped of its nuclear programme, missile array and allies, would also suffice.

    Since the October 7th Hamas massacre, Israel has been busy destroying Iran's proxies. The once-lauded Shia crescent surrounding Israel is looking a lot less threatening. Hezbollah has been destroyed, Hamas and the Houthis have been severely weakened, and Syria – though the aims of the new regime are still unclear – is now clearly sided with Sunni Turkey. Next, Iran itself… 

    What all this means is that, little noticed by western commentators who were busy with their myopic focus on Gaza, Israel has, over the last 18 months, effectively reversed two decades of Iranian advance across the Middle East. The result is that Iran now finds that its intended envelopment of Israel with proxy militias has been dismantled. Tools for Iran to exert pressure from the ground no longer exist.

    This means that the current confrontation looks set to focus on air, missile and drone warfare. As to how things proceed, much will depend on the continued capacities of Israel’s air defences, its ability to keep its current air corridor to Iran open and to continue reaping a toll on Iranian regime assets and personnel.

    The goal must be the crippling or drastic weakening of both the regime’s nuclear programme and its ability to govern. The result: either the permanent weakening of the Islamic Republic to a point where it can no longer busy itself with seeking to project power and aggression against its neighbours, or, preferably, the reduction of the regime’s capacities to a point where the Iranian people are able to free themselves from the mullah’s yoke. The latter outcome would be an appropriate end both to Tehran’s two-decade project of aggression in the Middle East, and to its ally Hamas’s decision to launch war in October 2023.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    For two days I was stranded in Paphos, but everywhere I went – from the streets to the hotel to the Chabad House that opened its doors within hours – I met Israelis who had one goal: get back home. Not to safety. To Israel.

    This afternoon, I finally did. On a tugboat.

    Nine of us squeezed onto a vessel captained by Eli, a veteran Israeli sailor who didn’t ask questions – just took the wheel. Among us: a brother and sister who are farmers and grow flowers in the Arava. They’d been in Holland on a sales trip. The brother insisted on returning to report for reserves.

    Another was a CEO from Karmiel. His company has 100 employees and global orders he’s now fighting to fulfill despite a country under fire. There was a woman – an energy worker – who left the Ivory Coast to come home, a high-tech investor who wanted to be back with his children and grandkids holed up at his house and two young men, fresh out of the army, who cut short their trip in the Philippines, coming under physical attacks in Greece and elsewhere because they spoke Hebrew.

    No one asked if it was safe. But that’s not how Israelis think.

    We are a people who run toward home, not away from it. Toward our families, our communities, our nation. Even in war.

    That’s the difference. That’s what makes us who we are.

  • Another one down:

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Some background:

    In the early 2000s, when the "Islamic Morality Police" was established, Brigadier General Ahmad Reza Radan was one of the leading defenders of this special division and openly supported the arrest of women who did not follow the obligatory hijab. In 2007, he ordered the police to arrest "boys" with what he called "perverted hairstyle", and during the 2009 uprising, his forces demonstrated a new level of brutality by killing protestors. In 2011, he banned the physicians and specialists practising in private health centres from putting on ties….

    Radan is the police commander to whom, in a 2008 live TV program, the presenter said, "There is no one who sees you and is not scared of you".

    Wikipedia:

    In October 2010, the United States Treasury Department sanctioned Radan for human rights violations. According to their statement, Radan, while serving as deputy commander of the police force, was responsible for the beatings, murders, and detentions of protesters during the protests following the 2009 Iranian presidential election.

    On 13 April 2011, Radan was sanctioned by the European Union for widespread and severe violations of the rights of Iranian citizens, and for a series of murders. According to the EU statement, he, as deputy commander of the police force, was involved in "beatings", "murders", "arbitrary detentions," and "arrests of protesters" by the police during the 2009 post-election protests.

    On 18 September 2024, the Canadian government sanctioned Radan, in addition to four other officials of the Islamic Republic who are directly responsible for implementing oppressive and discriminatory policies against women, girls, and minorities. The sanctions regulations prohibit transactions with the listed individuals, freeze their assets in Canada, and make any immigration to Canada of these individuals prohibited and inadmissible under Canadian immigration law.

    Radan claimed that being sanctioned by the US and EU was an honor for himself and all military commanders. He stated that "becoming a martyr and being sanctioned are equally enjoyable" to him. Radan views these sanctions as a "badge of honor", comparing them to an honorary medal for serving the Islamic Republic.

    At last his dream of martyrdom has been realised.


  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    Recognizing gay rights did not involve taking away anyone's rights. Yes, there were people who were offended by the acceptance of homosexuality, but in a liberal pluralistic society, there is no right not to be offended as long as one is not actually harmed in some way beyond being offended.

    To the extent that trans rights go beyond the right not to suffer discrimination in the distribution of social goods (housing, education, employment, etc.) and recognize, for example, the right of trans-identified males to access women's private spaces or play on women’s sports teams, or require that people speak as if they accept, for example, that trans-identified males are women, then rights are being taken away from women (the right to exist as a sex class, the right to private spaces/sports) and, as a general matter, from all of us because we lose our right of free speech, which includes the right not to be compelled to speak.

    That old "trans rights are human rights" slogan seen at every demo – when no one would actually spell out what human rights trans people are supposed to be lacking…they want you to understand that trans people are somehow being denied basic rights, suffering "discrimination in the distribution of social goods (housing, education, employment, etc.)", when in fact what they want is for trans people – trans-identified males – "to access women's private spaces or play on women’s sports teams, or require that people speak as if they accept, for example, that trans-identified males are women". That's why they never spell it out. It sounds good, but it's a con. 

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Not just academics. The UN's 'Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories', Francesca Albanese, expressed her support in a now-deleted tweet – "I stand with Justice, against racism, against Apartheid, and WITH Professor Miller."

    Added: 2021 letter from academics "in support of Professor Miller".

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    I’ve received thousands of messages from inside Iran showing young women dancing in the streets, or families cheering in their kitchens. They remember these commanders as the ones who gave the orders to shoot protesters in the eyes, jail teenage girls, and lie to the world while building bombs in secret.

    One mother in Tehran who was imprisoned for protesting the 2019 murder of her child wrote to me that “waking up to the news of Salami’s death, I started to scream out of joy that I’m seeing justice.” She told me that “soon you’ll be back to Iran and we’ll dance on the graves of these killers.”