• More on Saturday's London "trans rights" parade – a misogynistic hate march – from Jo Bartosch at UnHerd:

    Trans activism has always attracted bullies. I received my first threat nearly a decade ago — and since then, women’s rights campaigners I know have faced stalking, assault, bomb threats, and legal harassment for trying to organise meetings. Others have been pushed out of jobs or dragged through the courts.

    For years, this behaviour was ignored by politicians, while Stonewall, celebrities and HR departments lent a sheen of legitimacy to demands that were unhinged from the start.

    But the shine has now worn off. Thanks to a resurgent women’s movement and the Supreme Court’s ruling affirming that sex means biology, the trans lobby has been dragged into the daylight. It’s come as a shock to activists who, just a few years ago, were on the brink of rewriting the law.

    And, in the cold light of day, as we wake from the gender nightmare, the rampant misogyny at its heart becomes too obvious to ignore.

    There was no mandate for this movement’s demands. Changes to law and policy were pushed through by stealth, with lobby groups co-opting employers through training sessions and model policies. But when the public caught on, they said no. And for those used to getting their way, “no” is frighteningly unfamiliar.

    The Government should have listened to those who first sounded the alarm. Feminists — many of whom recognise the tactics used by abusers — warned that this was never about kindness. It was always about coercion. Now, with “Arm trans people” as a rallying cry, the direction of travel is obvious. The placards at Trans+ Pride weren’t a glitch. They were a sign of things to come.

    We have been warned.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

  • A clear-headed summary of the Gaza situation from Matti Friedman at The Free Press:

    A few weeks into the Gaza war that began on October 7, 2023, we Israelis learned from every major press outlet in the West that we’d just bombed a hospital and killed hundreds of people. The devastated Al-Ahli hospital was on front pages around the world, with a New York Times headline reporting “at least 500 dead.” Furious protests erupted, and a mob burned a synagogue in Tunisia.

    The story was fake. A misfired Palestinian rocket had landed near the hospital, which was intact.

    Around the same time, we started reading that Israel’s response to the October 7 terror attack—a war that Palestinians started, and which had barely begun at the time—was actually a “genocide,” an ideological slur thrown at Israel by Soviet propagandists, Arab dictators, and the Western left beginning in the 1970s. In the following months, hundreds of Israeli soldiers were killed fighting house-to-house in areas where Palestinian civilians—and combatants—were warned that troops were coming so they could leave.

    Reports of impending hunger engineered by Israel in Gaza have been commonplace not just since the beginning of this war but for at least a decade and a half, since Hamas seized the territory and Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade that supposedly turned Gaza into an “open-air prison.” The famine never materialized. Now we hear claims that this same period of supposedly extreme deprivation was actually a Gazan idyll that Israel has cruelly destroyed in this war.

    Very little of what is reported here, in other words, is what it seems. This is nothing new. Over the years, Israelis have been accused of fake massacres and rapes. The country’s actions are lied about almost daily by people describing themselves as journalists, analysts, and representatives of the United Nations, often using statistics that are themselves untrue.

    Is it different this time, though? Is there really a famine? Well…

    When I asked a friend—until recently a senior government official, with connections at the highest levels here and abroad—if people are starving in Gaza, he answered honestly, “I don’t know.”…

    An experienced Israeli civilian involved in the aid efforts, from an organization that works both with international aid groups and the Israeli military, said on Friday that mass starvation is not yet the reality but could be in the near future. There are already “pockets” of malnutrition and real hunger, he told me. The only way to avert a deterioration, he said, is for Israel to abandon the mistaken idea that withholding aid weakens Hamas, and to urgently flood Gaza with food. It’s the right move morally, he said, but also strategically, because the humanitarian crisis is devastating what’s left of Israel’s international support. He praised efforts by the United Arab Emirates and American-led groups like the World Food Program. Israel needs to work with them, he said, rethink its own policy, and move fast before things go from bad to worse.

    This is already happening. In the meantime, news consumers worldwide were galvanized over the weekend by disturbing photos like those of the Gazan child Muhammad al-Matouq, who appeared on the front page of Britain’s Daily Express and then on that of The New York Times and elsewhere as the symbol of Israel’s cruel starvation of innocents. After the photographs were seen around the world it became clear that the child in fact suffers from cerebral palsy and other conditions unrelated to starvation. The suffering child ended up being less the intended symbol of Israeli evil than of how genuine misery can be put to use by practitioners of narrative war.

    You might have thought that hunger in Gaza would work against Hamas, forcing the group to have mercy on its own civilians and accept the ceasefire desired by Israel and the U.S. and currently under discussion in Qatar. But Hamas knows that the opposite is true: The disaster they’ve engineered in Gaza fuels the global campaign against Israel. That’s presumably why the crescendo of hunger stories coincided on Friday with reports that Hamas has now hardened its positions in the talks, leading to their suspension. (One of Hamas’s top demands, according to an American official cited by The Wall Street Journal, is shutting down the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.)

    One of the terrible facts of this war is that the Palestinians who started the war, and who constructed the twisted battlefield on which it has been fought, won’t act to save their own people. Starvation and death serve the Hamas plan. That means that Israel must decide how far it wants to push—and when to stop.

  • Brendan O'Neill in the Spectator:

    Is the Edinburgh Fringe a Judenfrei zone now? With just a week to go before the Fringe kicks off, Jewish comedians are being unceremoniously cancelled. One venue has allegedly cited ‘safety concerns’ from staff, saying the extra muscle to deal with the threats to Jewish acts made them feel more unsafe. So instead of protecting Jews, you ditch them? What a shameful capitulation to the anti-Semitic mob.

    Numerous Jewish-themed comedy shows have been binned at the Whistlebinkies venue in the city. Rachel Creeger, Britain’s only practising Orthodox Jewish comedian, has been told her show Ultimate Jewish Mother is no longer going ahead. Jew-O-Rama was next for the chop. That’s a comedy night that features a ‘rolling line-up of Jewish and Jew-ish comedians’. It’s been running at the Fringe for nine years. Not anymore. Seems funny Jews aren’t allowed in 2025.

    And now the host of Jew-O-Rama, Philip Simon, says his one-man show ‘Shall I Compare Thee in a Funny Way?’ has been cancelled at the Banshee Labyrinth venue. ‘I am still processing the concept that in 2025 I can be cancelled just for being Jewish’, says Mr Simon. We should all be processing that. We should all be asking how it is possible that at a comedy festival in the 21st century, Jews are being booted off stage.

    The reasons given by the venues for their blitzing of the Jewish acts are ridiculous. They say it is not because the comedians are Jewish – I guess it is entirely coincidental that every one of the gagged comics is a Jew.

    There's a name for that.

    Philip Simon says he was told that his one-man show was scrubbed because his views on ‘the humanitarian crisis in Palestine’ do not align with those of the venue. What are his scandalous views? Well, he calls himself ‘pro-Israel’ and he has pleaded for the release of the Israeli hostages. Wanting Jews to be freed from the violent clutches of a neo-fascist militia is a cancellable offence now, it seems.

    There’s a neo-McCarthyite vibe to these venues’ erasure of Jews who fail to toe the ‘progressive’ line on the Israel-Hamas war.

    Well yes – but it's surely worse than just neo-McCarthyite. Their views, like the safety concerns waffle, are not the real issue here. What matters is that they're Jews. 

    Stephen Pollard, again in the Spectator, has more:

    You don’t have to be a comedian or an expert in decoding sophistry to understand what’s going on here. You just have to have a basic knowledge of history, because it’s what has been going on for millennia. Jews have been banned for being Jews. Here we go again. They can dress it up in any drivel about health and safety they want, but when you translate ‘concerns over staff safety’ into reality it means, ‘Jews are banned unless they manage to sneak in because no one has realised they are Jews’….

    It could hardly be more blatant: two Jews have been cancelled because they are Jewish. The rest is noise. The fact that neither Creeger nor Simon have expressed anything other than a desire for peace and freedom for the hostages is irrelevant, because one of the strongest lessons of Jewish history is that they come for the ‘good’ Jews too. It doesn’t matter if you think you’re behaving as they want you to behave: in their eyes, all that matters is that you’re a Jew.

    Politicians are wont to repeat the phrase, ‘There is no place for antisemitism in [add the name of a city or country]’. In reality, however, in Britain in 2025 there is every place for antisemitism. Always and everywhere.

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    And as long as the Western media put all the blame for the situation in Gaza on Israel – even to the extent of malicious fabrications. A famine in Gaza is just what Hamas want….

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    "Because regardless of slogans, Hamas actually wants a famine in Gaza and needs mass deaths from hunger, which is the group’s final play and last hope for ending the war in a way that is favorable to its goals…."

    Added:

    Also this thread….

    https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    "Hamas is giving Western media sources & their audience exactly what they have an appetite for: a restoration of the supposed truth -which went out of kilter on Oct. 7-that the Israelis are a brutal people with agency & that the Palestinians are helpless victims with no agency

    "This restoration is also a palliative to guilt about worldwide mistreatment of Jews, past and present.

    "For examples the likes of the French and Irish governments need feel no guilt over their shameful WWII roles if the Israelis are the new Nazis, perpetrators of genocide and mass starvation. They *want* these things to be true.

    "In sum: it is a fact that the dominant war narrative outside of Israel and the Jewish press is Palestinian civilian suffering – and this is by calculated design. It is Hamas' great victory."

     

  • https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

    Full text:

    After taking our order, the waiter returned and suddenly asked what language we were speaking. I replied casually, “English and German.” “No, no,” he insisted. “What were you just speaking now?” I answered, “Hebrew, of course.”

    He looked me directly in the eye and said, without hesitation: “In that case, leave. I’m not serving you food.” Just like that.

    The initial shock and humiliation were profound. But what struck us even more deeply was what came next — or rather, what didn’t. The people around us were clearly startled, some offered sympathetic glances… and then, quietly, they went back to their dinners, their conversations, their wine — as though nothing had happened.

    Welcome to Europe, 2025.

    Still shaken, we stepped onto the stage that evening, hearts heavy, and sought refuge in the music we love. Performing Dvořák’s Dumky Trio to a completely sold-out hall offered us a rare kind of healing — a fleeting but powerful moment of grace amid the dissonance…

  • From MEMRI TV

    In a video posted by Abdullah113438 on X on July 26, 2025, a woman in the Gaza Strip lashed out at the Hamas leadership for conducting negotiations with Israel on full stomachs in an air‑conditioned room. She said that they want the people in Gaza to remain steadfast so they can live in luxury, with their “belly sticking 10 meters out.” She added that if they want the people in Gaza to remain steadfast, they should go be steadfast with them and conduct their negotiations while hungry, while their sons are killed, and while they are thirsty and living in blazing‑hot tents.

  • From the Telegraph:

    Trans activists have called for their community to be “armed” after a Supreme Court ruling barred biological men from women-only spaces.

    A protester on the London Trans+ Pride march on Saturday carried placards reading: “DIY or Die. Trans emancipation. Not rainbow capitalism. Arm trans people.”

    Another sign read: “Bitch trolls from hell,” with pictures of JK Rowling and the bosses of For Women Scotland, who won the Supreme Court case against the Scottish Government on gender in April.

    Pride-sign

    Showing their true woman-hating colours. If people don't see the trans movement now for what it is, they surely never will.

    Helen Joyce, the director of advocacy for human rights charity Sex Matters, which campaigns for clarity about biological sex in law and life, said the signs revealed how “central hatred of women is to trans activism”.

    She said: “The reason this movement treats JK Rowling and the grassroots campaigners of For Women Scotland as enemies is simply that they dare to say no to men who want to transgress women’s boundaries.

    “One side in this debate stands up for everyone’s rights to safety, dignity and privacy in single sex spaces.

    “The other calls for violence against women. It shouldn’t be hard for politicians and public figures to decide which side they are on.”