Streeting responds to the Sullivan Review on the erasure of biological sex by UK bodies like the NHS and the Civil Service.
The Sullivan Review underlines the importance of recording biological sex – not just for research and insight, but also patient safety.
Doing so does not prevent us from recording, recognising and respecting people’s gender identity where these differ.
We’ll act on findings.
— Wes Streeting (@wesstreeting) March 20, 2025
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Which is very good news of course – but where is this gender identity of which you speak, Wes? Do doctors need special training to locate it? How do I get to know my gender identity? Or is it just a feely thing taken up and pushed by gender cultists who purposefully play on the ambiguity of the sex/gender distinction to pretend that any male who doesn't conform to male stereotypes has a female gender identity, and any female who doesn't conform to female stereotypes has a male gender identity. The main beneficiaries of this – the main pushers – would appear to be autogynephilic men who get a sexual thrill out of pretending to be women, and can now present themselves as brave pioneers of the trans revolution. The main victims are women, and especially troubled young girls who are sucked into this social contagion and persuaded to ruin their lives in the nonsensical belief that somehow they were born into the wrong body.
It's regressive nonsense.
Mick Hartley 
Leave a comment