Mick Hartley

Good news and bad news. Yes, the use of puberty blockers in the NHS for children with "gender dysphoria" will be limited, with the emphasis on psychological support and therapy. But then a dedicated "gender service" institutionalises the whole idea of changing gender, helping to reinforce the idea that "being born in the wrong body" is a genuine issue for some children.

From the Telegraph:

Children as young as seven will get transgender treatment on the NHS, according to plans seen by The Telegraph. In details of the new service to replace the controversial Tavistock clinic, NHS England has set out how it will limit the use of puberty blockers and ban activists and teachers from referring children for treatment.

For the first time, it has set a minimum age of seven for referral to the gender identity clinics.

These children will be offered psychological support and therapy that will focus on issues that may have led to their feelings about their gender.

However, experts have warned that the age restriction could still put young children with mental health problems on a “pathway to medical transition”.

Campaigners welcomed the “move toward an evidence-based approach”, but said there was still work to be done to ensure children are kept safe.

The NHS announced last year that it would be closing the Tavistock transgender clinic after a review by Dr Hilary Cass found it was “not safe”.

It was the only NHS transgender clinic treating children and concerns were raised that young people were being rushed down a medical pathway.

The clinic is being replaced by a set of regional centres that will be led by medical doctors, rather than therapists, and consider the impact of other conditions such as autism and mental health issues.

The move came amid growing concern about the impact of gender ideology on children, including in schools where some were being socially transitioned without their parents’ consent.

NHS England said that a new service was needed because there was “scarce and inconclusive evidence to support clinical decision-making” at the Tavistock clinic.

As part of the new approach, medics have been reminded that for “most” young people, the feeling of being in the wrong body is just a “phase” and does not persist into adulthood.

Officials have now set out their plan for how children will be able to access the service, which has been sent to experts for their input. The plans have been seen by The Telegraph.

The plans state: “Children under seven years of age may not be expected to have sufficiently developed their intellectual understanding of, and comprehension of, sex and gender to be able to understand the reasons for, and potential consequences of, a referral to a specialist gender incongruence service.”

By seven, children will “be more established within school, and education professionals and school nurses will be able to contribute to a general observational view as to the appropriateness of a referral”.

Previously, there was no minimum age for referral and children as young as three were treated by the Tavistock. On average, three children aged under seven were being referred every month.

Dr David Bell, a consultant psychiatrist and former governor at the Tavistock before he became a whistleblower about the clinic’s work, said: “For me, there is a structural problem which needs particular caution: referring a child to a gender service, even if they are seen in the context of a multidisciplinary team, in that the mere fact of referral is consequential.

“It risks the child’s difficulties being viewed by themselves and their family as primarily to do with gender. Labelling the problem as a gender problem can easily be the first step on a pathway to medical transition.

“My view is that certainly for the younger ages, children should be managed within the context of the ordinary Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).

“Their difficulties should not be designated as a gender problem, it is much more appropriate that they be seen as individuals who are distressed and this is one way in which that distress is expressed.”

Dr Bell also described the definition of gender incongruence in childhood included in the specification as “dangerous”. It says it is characterised by “make-believe or fantasy play, toys, games, or activities and playmates that are typical of the experienced gender rather than the assigned sex”.

The definition, which comes from the World Health Organisation, is “completely the wrong way of looking at it”, said Dr Bell. He added: “We are corrupting a child’s capacity to have an imagination and imposing a gender stereotype on them.”

Exactly.

Gender dysphoria used to be exceptionally rare. It's recent explosion – now Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria – is clearly due to social contagion rather than our increased ability to observe this strange condition. We shouldn't be encouraging it. And yet – it's here…and something needs to be done.

From the Times coverage:

The number of teenage girls with gender dysphoria, a state of profound discomfort with their biological sex, had risen by 5,000 per cent in seven years.

Anastassis Spiliadis, a psychotherapist, published a paper, Taking the Lid Off the Box, on a study of 128 young people, two thirds of them female, who arrived at Gids adamant that they wanted hormone blockers but after extended psychotherapy changed their minds about medication.

During therapy, common problems emerged: a sense of isolation from peers, ruptured parental relationships, female autism and homophobic bullying.