More humourless religious types:

Jesus1bbc1 The government in the Indian state of Meghalaya has confiscated textbooks showing pictures of Jesus Christ holding a cigarette and a can of beer.

The book has been used for primary classes and has caused a furore in the north-eastern state, where more than 70% of the population are Christians.

State Education Minister Ampareen Lyngdoh said legal action against the publishers was being contemplated….

"We are deeply hurt by the insensitivity of the publisher. How can one show such total disrespect for a religion?" asked Dominic Jala, the Archbishop of Shillong.

"Just think how this would impact on students at such a tender age."

The Catholic Church in India has banned all textbooks by Skyline Publications from all its schools.

"We have told all our member schools across the country to ban this publisher," said Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) spokesman Babu Joseph.

The Church has also asked the government to take strict action against the publisher and to ban any such "objectionable publications" from all schools in future, he said.

"Jesus Christ is central to Christian faith and Christian life. The attempt to tarnish his image is highly objectionable and goes against the spirit of religious tolerance in India," Mr Joseph said.

Because tolerance, of course, means never being offended – and demanding that the government take "strict action against the publisher", and ban any future publications they deem objectionable.

Let's not even think what might've happened if it'd been Mohammed.

Posted in

5 responses to “Deeply Hurt”

  1. tolkein Avatar
    tolkein

    I’m sorry, but I do object to Jesus being used as a prop in an advertising campaign. I don’t think the advertising should be banned but I see nothing wrong in Christians calling to boycott the publishers of such stuff. They’re only interested in money and I don’t see that it’s wrong to say that they can get their money elsewhere. The publishers should face the commercial consequences of their actions.
    And why should schools permit advertising in textbooks? And advertising that is false? Jesus drank wine, not beer, as far as we know, so the textbooks were (a) wrong, and (b) carrying commercial advertising.
    So what’s wrong with the State’s actions, again?

    Like

  2. Abandon Ship! Avatar
    Abandon Ship!

    Free to offend and all that, but this is spectacularly bad taste for a school textbook. What can the publishers have been thinking? Christians in India can be the subject of persecution, from Hindus and Muslims, so this sort of thing doesn’t really help. I guess I must be a humourless religious type!

    Like

  3. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    It’s not the boycotting so much as the attempt to get the publisher prosecuted. Plus this whole thing of believing that tolerance means the same as never being offended.
    It’s never made clear in the article what the context is in which the image appears…but would they have adverts in a primary school textbook? If it is an advert, yes, it’s certainly tacky, but I think we’re seeing something of an over-reaction here.

    Like

  4. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    Quite right, Tolkien. The School Board needs to be a tich more discriminating from whence they acquire their texts, eh? Nothing like getting stuck with a run of a couple thousand books to get the attention of the corporate beancounters; no need to get all lawyerly over it.

    Like

  5. Jose Avatar
    Jose

    Mick H – You find it tacky for Jesus picture to appear in such a manner. I am sure you are an Atheist otherwise you would not remark that way. I am not very religious but i believe that people of different religions should live in Harmony. Before Prophet Mohammed pictures were printed in Denmark in the name of humour and free press. Semi-nude Hindu deity painted by M. F. Hussain in the name of Art. And now Jesus picture in the name of Advertisement. How far people can go to harm others or gain publicity. Don’t they have anything else to do other than to subject themselves to this cheap publicity.

    Like

Leave a comment