The Times' science editor Mark Henderson reports:

Astronomers have confirmed that a planet orbiting a distant star has a rocky structure similar to that of Earth, a find that shortens the odds on extraterrestrial life being discovered.

New observations of a planet named Corot-7b, which circles a star 500 light years away in the constellation Monoceros, or the Unicorn, have shown that its density is similar to the Earth’s, indicating that it is also a solid, rocky world.

The discovery is important for the prospects of discovering life elsewhere because Corot-7b is the first exoplanet — a planet beyond our solar system — orbiting another star that has been found to have the sort of solid structure that might harbour living things.

Although it is unlikely that the planet itself could be home to living organisms because it is so hot — it is so close to its parent star that scientists have likened it to Dante’s Inferno — the new research suggests that other rocky worlds are probably common.  […]

“Theoretical models suggest that the planet may have lava or boiling oceans on its surface. With such extreme conditions, this planet is definitively not a place for life to develop.”

The confirmed existence of a planet with a rocky structure and a density like the Earth’s, however, increases the chances that similar worlds with more favourable conditions for life will be found.

The Corot probe and the Nasa Kepler planet-hunting observatory are currently in orbit looking for such planets.

Alan Boss, of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, who works on the Kepler project, said: “The evidence is becoming overwhelming that we live in a crowded Universe.”

Eh? It's an interesting find, no doubt, but to suggest from this that "the evidence is becoming overwhelming that we live in a crowded Universe" is simply absurd. It does rather highlight, though, how desperately some people want to believe that we're not alone: not a good sign for a genuine scientific enquiry.
Posted in

7 responses to “Alone Again”

  1. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    ….? Surely you’re not suggesting that the current evidence favours a lifeless universe, other than us? I can’t even prove unequivocally that YOU exist; I mean what evidence do I have other than the images on my screen?
    Granted, the probability of it existing on Corot-7b is minimal, but that wasn’t what the implication was; the writer just got carried away.
    The real news is that technology has advanced to the point of being able to detect planets and their consistency from 500 light years distance.

    Like

  2. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    I’m certainly on the sceptical side when it comes to other intelligent life out there. It’s just a long long long way from finding a vaguely rock-like planet, to assuming that some kind of intelligent life is going to evolve there.

    Like

  3. tolkein Avatar
    tolkein

    As Fermi is reported to have said “Where are they?” If the universe was bursting with intelligent life, where is it?
    That’s not to say there isn’t any, but the conditions for Earth type life are tough – not too far from the right type of Sun (too close, you get Venus, too far you get Mars), a nice gas giant or two to protect you from wandering comets/asteroids (see recent collisions on Jupiter for why this is a good idea), a handy planetoid sized Moon to provide tides (ours seems to have taken chunks of the original planet off, leaving us with nice big oceans and big landmasses), away from lots of other nasty stars (being close to the centre of the galaxy can’t be fun), avoid being a civilization when dinosaur busters arrive, or when the planet freezes over – we’ve had a couple of those. I wonder how we’d have coped? The odds for lots of intelligent life doesn’t look so good.
    And if there was life and it found us, what then? Ask Native Americans, Aborigines, Africans etc what it was like when technologically advanced people found them. Or Jews when the Nazis took power. Or kulaks (aka peasants Stalin distrusted ) or Ukrainians, when Stalin ruled. Do you really want to find intelligent life elsewhere?

    Like

  4. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    You guys have made a giant leap from “life” to “intelligent life”. Please reread Henderson’s article; no mention of intelligence there.
    That’s not to say there isn’t but rather let’s start with the most basic. It’s only been 40 years since the Archaea were discovered, throwing a serious wrench into our understanding of ‘life’… 100deg. C. …man that is hot!
    http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/archaea/archaea.html
    My understanding is that the volume of lifeforms below the Earth’s crust exceeds that above it.

    Like

  5. Mick H Avatar
    Mick H

    You have a point there. “Crowded” kind of implies intelligent, but it needn’t.

    Like

  6. Anthony Avatar

    Well we know that from our own planet.

    Like

  7. DaninVan Avatar
    DaninVan

    Zing! …good one, Anthony 🙂

    Like

Leave a comment