Nick Cohen has a piece today about Lockerbie, and the need for the government's secret papers to be published so that we, and more importantly the relatives of the victims, can finally get to see all the evidence.

As anyone who's studied the case will know, the crucial witness against the convicted Libyan, Megrahi, was the Maltese shop-owner who claimed to identify him as the man who bought the clothes later found in the suitcase which contained the bomb. Nick, who reported on the affair at the time and visited the Malta boutique, believes this evidence to be sound. While dismissing the conspiracy theories, though, he rather oddly drops this:

…we may have to wait for a revolution in Libya and the opening of the secret police's archives – or maybe and more probably in Iran, which could also have had a hand in the crime.

Which suggests he may not be quite so convinced by the official explanation after all. Iranian involvement is, of course, the most popular alternative scenario championed by many, including, most effectively, the late Paul Foot in Private Eye (the man who, ahem, campaigned so vociferously for James Hanratty's innocence – nevermind the whole MMR fiasco). 

In the Sunday Times, meanwhile:

American intelligence documents blaming Iran for the Lockerbie bombing would have been produced in court if the Libyan convicted of Britain’s worst terrorist attack had not dropped his appeal.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, a former Libyan intelligence officer expected to be freed this week, had instructed his lawyers to produce internal US intelligence communications unavailable to his defence team at his trial in 2000.

The cables, from the American Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), suggest that Iran was behind the attack on Pan Am flight 103, which killed 270 people in 1988, in response to the shooting down of an Iranian commercial airliner by the USS Vincennes, an American warship, five months earlier.

One document that the defence team had planned to produce was a memo from the DIA dated September 24, 1989. It states: “The bombing of the Pan Am flight was conceived, authorised and financed by Ali-Akbar (Mohtashemi-Pur), the former Iranian minister of interior.

“The execution of the operation was contracted to Ahmad (Jabril), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command (PFLP-GC) leader, for a sum of 1,000,000 US dollars.

“One hundred thousand dollars of this money was given to Jabril up front in Damascus by the Iranian ambassador to Sy [ie Syria], Muhammad Hussan (Akhari) for initial expenses. The remainder of the money was to be paid after successful completion of the mission.”

The document is included in an unpublished report by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, a public body that considers miscarriage of justice claims and which had cast doubt in 2007 on the safety of Megrahi’s conviction.

The report also cites a DIA briefing in December 1989 entitled Pan Am 103, Deadly Co-operation, which named Iran as the probable state sponsor of the bombing.

Robert Baer, a retired senior CIA agent who claims that Iran was behind the attack, has alleged that the Americans were wary of pursuing the country in case it disrupted oil supplies and damaged the economy.

There's lots more mileage in this case, for sure.

Posted in

Leave a comment