It’s not something that we didn’t know already, but it’s good to see some kind of official confirmation:

The UK’s treatment of asylum seekers falls “seriously below” the standards of a civilised society, a report says.

The Independent Asylum Commission, led by an ex-senior judge, said the system denied sanctuary to some in need and failed to remove others who should go.

It said the treatment of some asylum seekers was a shameful blemish on the UK’s international reputation.

But the Border and Immigration Agency has rejected the report, claiming it operates a “firm but humane” system.

The Commission spent a year researching the report and spoke to former home secretaries, policy makers and asylum seekers. […]

Figures show there were 23,430 asylum applications in 2007 – the lowest for 14 years – and a quarter of the record set in 2002.

Some asylum seekers tell their stories.

Posted in

One response to “A Shameful Blemish”

  1. Richard Avatar
    Richard

    A few years ago I did a Google search (‘UK asylum figured 1993-2002’) about UK Asylum figures. There have been about 1.2 million, which is rather a lot. It is difficult to get a truly accurate figure because dependents, and children born here after the initial application are not included.
    Oh and about 3/4 of applicants are men. I think that this gender imbalance is also reflected in the totally illegal immigrants (500 thousand?) and amongst the East-Europeans, although it is not quite as dramatic in their case.

    Like

Leave a comment